A Linking Test that investigates the feasibility of inverse modelling: Application to a simple rainfall interception model for Mt. Gambier, southeast South Australia

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 2023-2032

  Pollacco, J A P ^a,b   Angulo Jaramillo, R ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b UAE University   (United States)

^c LABORATOIRE DE GLACIOLOGIE ET GÉOPHYSIQUE DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Equifinality classification; Inverse modelling; Linking Test; Net precipitation; Pinus radiata plantation; Rainfall interception; Stemflow; Throughfall; Water balance

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; RAIN; TESTING;

EQUIFINALITY; INVERSE MODELLING; PINUS RADIATA; RAINFALL INTERCEPTION; STEMFLOW; THROUGHFALL; WATER BALANCE;

CLIMATE MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERCEPTION; INVERSE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; PLANTATION; RAINFALL; STEMFLOW; WATER BUDGET;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; MOUNT GAMBIER; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

CONIFEROPHYTA; PINUS RADIATA;

EID: 67650302253     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7329     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Beven KJ. 1993. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Advance in Water Resources 16: 41-51.
2. Beven KJ. 1997. Distributed Modelling in Hydrology Application of the Topmodel concept. Willey: Chichester.
3. Beven KJ, Binley A. 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 6(3): 279-298.
4. Boyle DP, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S. 2000. Towards improved calibration of hydrologic models: combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resources Research 37(11): 2749-2759.
5. Brown JH, Baker AC. 1970. An analysis of throughflow and stemflow in mixed oak stands. Water Resources Research 6: 316-323.
6. Calder IR. 1990. Evaporation in the Uplands. John Wiley & Sons: New York, Chichester.
7. Calder IR, Newson MD. 1979. Land use and upland water resources in Britain-a strategic look. Water Resources Bulletin 16: 1628-1639.
8. Clarke RT. 1994. Statistical Modelling in Hydrology. Wiley: Chichester.
9. Crockford RH, Richardson DP. 1990. Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and pine plantation in southeastern Australia: II. Stemflow and factors affecting stemflow in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest and in a Pinus radiata plantation. Hydrological Processes 4: 145-155.
10. Feller MC. 1981. Water balances in Eucalyptus regnans, E. oblique and Pinus radiata forests in Victoria. Australian Forestry 44: 153-161.
11. Gash JHC, Lloyd CR, Lachaud G. 1995. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. Journal of Hydrology 170: 79-86.
12. Gash JHC, Stewart JB. 1977. The evaporation from Thetford Forest during 1975. Journal of Hydrology 35: 385-396.
13. Herwitz SR. 1987. Raindrop impact and water flow on the vegetative surfaces of trees and the effects on stemflow and throughfall generation. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 12: 425-432.
14. Huber A, Iroume A. 2001. Variability of annual rainfall partitioning for different sites and forest covers in Chile. Journal of Hydrology 248(1): 78-92.
15. Johnson RC. 1990. The interception, throughfall and stemflow in a forest in highland scotland and the comparison with other upland forests in the UK. Journal of Hydrology 118: 281-287.
16. Keim RF, Skaugset AE, Weiler M. 2006. Storage of water on vegetation under simulated rainfall of varying intensities. Advances in Water Resources 29(7): 974-986.
17. Kelliher FM, Whitehead D, Pollock DS. 1992. Rainfall interception by trees and slash in a young Pinus radiata D Don stand. Journal of Hydrology 131(1-4): 187-204.
18. Kimmins JP. 1973. Some statistical aspects of sampling throughfall precipitation in nutrient cycling studies in British Columbian costal forests. Ecology 54: 1008-1019.
19. Kostelnik KM, Lynch JA, Grimm JW, Corbett ES. 1989. Sample size requirements for estimation of throughfall chemistry beneath a mixed hardwood forest. Journal of Environmental Quality 18: 274-280.
20. Langford KJ, O'Shaughnessy PJ. 1978. A study of canopy interception in native forests and conifer plantations. Water Supply Catchment Hydrology Research, Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works.
21. Linsley RK, Kohler MA, Paulhus JL. 1949. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill: New York, 689.
22. Liu S. 1996. A new model for the prediction of rainfall interception in forest canopies. Ecological Modeling 99(2/3): 151-159.
23. Madsen H. 2000. Automatic calibration and uncertainty assessment in Rainfall-Runoff Modelling, 2000 Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, Hyatt Regency Minneapolis, USA, July 30-August 2.
24. Nelder JA, Mead R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 7(4): 308-313.
25. Pollacco JAP, Soria-Ugalde JM, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Braud I, Saugier B. 2008a. A Linking Test to reduce the number of hydraulic parameters necessary to simulate groundwater recharge in unsaturated soils. Advances Water Resources 31(702): 355-369.
26. Pollacco JAP, Braud I, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Saugier B. 2008b. A Linking Test to establish if groundwater recharge can be determined by optimising vegetation parameters against soil moisture. Annals of Forest Science 65(702): 1-14.
27. Pook EW, Moore PHR, Hall T. 1991. Rainfall interception by trees of Pinus radiata and Eucalyptus viminalis in a 1300 mm rainfall area of southeastern New South Wales: I. Gross loses and their variability. Hydrological Processes 5: 127-141.
28. Rutter AJ, Kershaw KA, Robins PC, Morton AJ. 1971. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests, 1. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of Corsican Pine. Agricultural Meteorology 9: 367-384.
29. Smith MK. 1974. Throughfall, stemflow and interception in pine and eucalyt forests. Australian Forestry 36: 190-197.
30. Šraj M, Brilly M, Mikoš M. 2008. Rainfall interception by two deciduous Mediterranean forests of contrasting stature in slovenia. Agriculture Forestry Meteorology 148(1): 121-134.
31. Thiemann M, Trosset M, Gupta H, Sorooshian S. 2001. Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models. Water Resources Research 37(10): 2521-2535.
32. van Dijk AIJM, Keenan RJ. 2007. Planted forests and water in perspective. Forest Ecology and Management 251(1-2): 1-9.
33. van Werkhoven K, Wagener T, Reed P, Tang Y. 2008. Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient. Water Resources Research 44: W01429. DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006271.
34. Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Bastidas LA, Bouten W, Sorooshian S. 2003. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research 39(8): 1214. DOI: 10.1029/ 2002WR001746.
35. Wang E, Cresswell H, Paydar Z, Gallant J. 2008. Opportunities for manipulating catchment water balance by changing vegetation type on a topographic sequence: a simulation study. Hydrological Processes 22(6): 736-749.
36. Wattenbach M, Zebisch M, Hattermann F, Gottschalk P, Goemann H, Kreins P, Badeck F, Lasch P, Suckow F, Wechsung F. 2007. Hydrological impact assessment of afforestation and change in tree-species composition-a regional case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg (Germany). Journal of Hydrology 346(1-2): 15.1-15.17.
37. Whitehead D, Kelliher FM. 1991. A canopy water balance model for a Pinus radiata stand before and after thinning. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 55(1/2): 109-126.
38. Yapo PO, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S. 1998. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. Journal of Hydrology 204: 83-97.