New noninvasive imaging technologies in coronary artery disease

Current Cardiology Reports

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 252-257

  Gaztanaga, Juan ^a   Garcia, Mario J ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; DOBUTAMINE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; GADOLINIUM;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORING; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DRUG UPTAKE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CALCIUM; CAROTID STENOSIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 67650263685     PISSN: 15233782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-009-0037-5     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Lusis AJ: Atherosclerosis. Nature 2000, 407:233-241.
2. Rumberger JA, Kaufman L: A rosetta stone for coronary calcium risk stratification: Agatston, volume, and mass scores in 11,490 individuals. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 181:743-748.
3. Knez A, Becker C, Becker A, et al.: Determination of coronary calcium with multi-slice spiral computed tomography: A comparative study with electron-beam CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002, 18:295-303.
4. Becker CR, Kleffel T, Crispin A, et al.: Coronary artery calcium measurement: Agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001, 176:1295-1298.
5. Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M, et al.: Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: The St. Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:158-165.
6. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, et al.: Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004, 291:210-215.
7. Lakoski SG, Greenland P, Wong ND, et al.: Coronary artery calcium scores and risk for cardiovascular events in women classified as "low risk" based on Framingham risk score: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch Intern Med 2007, 167:2437-2442.
8. Budoff MJ, Nasir K, McClelland RL, et al.: Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:345-352.
9. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: Comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:431-437.
10. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, et al.: Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: Diagnostic performance. Heart 2008, 94:1132-1137.
11. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: Assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:424-430.
12. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al.: Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1896-1910.
13. Hamon M, MoreDlo R, Riddell JW: Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 6-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography - meta-analysis. Radiology 2007, 245:720-731.
14. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al.: Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:62-70.
15. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, et al.: Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50:1161-1170.
16. Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Schepis T, et al.: Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1162-1173.
17. Ostrom MP, Gopal A, Ahmadi N, et al.: Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1335-1343.
18. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, et al.: Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: A comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1241-1247.
19. Pohle K, Achenbach S, Macneill B, et al.: Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multidetector row CT: comparison to IVUS. Atherosclerosis 2007, 190:174-180.
20. Choi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ, et al.: Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:357-365.
21. Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT, et al.: Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000, 102:506-510.
22. Corti R, Fuster V, Fayad ZA, et al.: Lipid lowering by simvastatin induces regression of human atherosclerotic lesions: Two years' follow-up by high-resolution noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002, 106:2884-2887.
23. Fayad ZA, Fuster V: Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000, 902:173-186.
24. Aletras AH, Tilak GS, Natanzon A, et al.: Retrospective determination of the area at risk for reperfused acute myocardial infarction with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Histopathological and displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) functional validations. Circulation 2006, 113:1865-1870.
25. Larose E, Yeghiazarians Y, Libby P, et al.: Characterization of human atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2005, 112:2324-2331.
26. Kerwin WS, Oikawa M, Yuan C, et al.: MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2008, 59:507-514.
27. Calcagno C, Cornily JC, Hyafil F, et al.: Detection of neovessels in atherosclerotic plaques of rabbits using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008, 28:1311-1317.
28. Kuijpers D, van Dijkman PR, Janssen CH, et al.: Dobutamine stress MRI. Part II. Risk stratification with dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients suspected of myocardial ischemia. Eur Radiol 2004, 14:2046-2052.
29. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al.: Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: Adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007, 115:1769-1776.
30. Pilz G, Jeske A, Klos M, et al.: Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 2008, 101:1408-1412.
31. Stork A, Muellerleile K, Bansmann PM, et al.: Value of T2-weighted, first-pass and delayed enhancement, and cine CMR to differentiate between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:610-617.
32. Deichen JT, Prante O, Gack M, et al.: Uptake of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in human monocyte-macrophages in vitro. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003, 30:267-273.
33. Tatsumi M, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Wahl RL: Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the aortic wall at PET/CT: Possible finding for active atherosclerosis. Radiology 2003, 229:831-837.
34. Yun M, Jang S, Cucchiara A, et al.: 18F FDG uptake in the large arteries: A correlation study with the atherogenic risk factors. Semin Nucl Med 2002, 32:70-76.
35. Bural GG, Torigian DA, Chamroonrat W, et al.: FDG-PET is an effective imaging modality to detect and quantify age-related atherosclerosis in large arteries. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008, 35:562-569.
36. Paulmier B, Duet M, Khayat R, et al.: Arterial wall uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET imaging in stable cancer disease patients indicates higher risk for cardiovascular events. J Nucl Cardiol 2008, 15:209-217.
37. Wykrzykowska J, Lehman S, Williams G, et al.: Imaging of inflamed and vulnerable plaque in coronary arteries with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suppression of myocardial uptake using a low-carbohydrate, high-fat preparation. J Nucl Med 2009, 50:563-568.
38. Lee SJ, On YK, Lee EJ, et al.: Reversal of vascular 18F-FDG uptake with plasma high-density lipoprotein elevation by atherogenic risk reduction. J Nucl Med 2008, 49:1277-1282.
39. Lancelot E, Amirbekian V, Brigger I, et al.: Evaluation of matrix metalloproteinases in atherosclerosis using a novel noninvasive imaging approach. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008, 28:425-432.