From reproductive choice to reproductive justice

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 106-109

  Cook, Rebecca J ^a   Dickens, Bernard M ^a  

^a at the University of Toronto Wagner is also a faculty member of the Canadian Medical Associations' Physician Management Institute   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abortion rights; Conscientious objection; Contraception; Developments legal; Reproductive health

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONTRACEPTION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INDUCED ABORTION; INFORMED CONSENT; JUSTICE; LAW; LEGAL LIABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS;

EID: 67650260556     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. "Supplementary Information about the United States, Scheduled for Review during the CERD Committee's 72nd Session" shadow letter by the Center for Reproductive Rights, dated December 19, 2007. Online at: http://www.reproductiverights.org/pdf/CERD%20Shadow%20Letter%20Final_07_08.pdf.
2. AS v. Hungary, CEDAW, Communication No. 4/2004, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 (2006).
3. R. (on the application of Axon) v. Secretary of State for Health, [2006] England and Wales High Court 37. (Admin). Case No. CO/5307/2004.
4. CCC, Sala VI, "Luque, Viviana Beatriz s/nulidad" (causa n°34.953), rta 4/6/2008, Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Criminal y Correccional, Sala VI.
5. Constitutional Court of Chile: Unconstitutionality requirement filed against some provisions of the "National Rules on Fertility Regulation", approved by Supreme Decree N° 48, 2007, of the Health Ministry, File No. 740-07-CDS, April 18, 2008. http://www.tribunalconstitucional.cl.
6. Executive order No. 003 (2003), City of Manila.
7. Linangan ng Kababaihan, ReproCen, Center for Reproductive Rights. Imposing misery: the impact of Manila's contraceptive ban on women and families (2007), L ng K. (Likhaen), Quezon City 16
8. Decision 2002 00251 01, Colombian State Council, Administrative Chamber, First section, June 5, 2008 (Counselor Ostau de Lafont Pianeta).
9. Tummino v. Torti, Memorandum and Order No. 05-CV-366(ERK)(VVP), (US District Court, Eastern District of New York, March 23, 2009).
10. Boland R., and Katzive L. Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007. Int Fam Plann Perspect 34 3 (2008) 110-120
11. Law No. 16/2007.
12. Law No. 2007/005 of January 10, 2007 on Reproductive Health, Article 42.
13. Proclamation No. 414/2004, bringing into force Criminal Code Article 551.
14. Decision C-355 of 2006, Constitutional Court of Colombia.
15. Judgment of August 28, 2008 on the Constitutional Action 146/2007 and its accumulated 147/2007, National Supreme Court of Mexico.
16. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, No. PL. ÚS 12/01-297, 4 December 2007.
17. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Concluding observations on the report of Slovakia, CEDAW/C/SVK/CO4, July 18, 2008.
18. Association pour l'access à l'avortement c. Quebec (Procureur général), [2006] J Q no 8654 (Superior Court of Quebec).
19. Gonzales v. Carhart, 127 Supreme Court Reporter 1610 (2007).
20. Center for Reproductive Rights. Abortion worldwide: twelve years of reform (2007), CRR, New York 5
21. Cook R.J., Erdman J.N., and Dickens B.M. Achieving transparency in implementing abortion laws. Int J Gynecol Obstet 99 2 (2007) 157-161
22. Case 161-02. Paulina del Carmen Ramirez Jacinto v. Mexico. Friendly Settlement. Report No. 21/07 (2007).
23. Bodnar A. Case law concerning the lack of availability of services for termination of pregnancy in Poland. In: Nowicka W. (Ed). Reproductive rights in Poland (2008), Federation of Woman and Family Planning, Warsaw 45-64
24. Decision T-209 of 2008 (Constitutional Court of Colombia).
25. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. Ethical guidelines on conscientious objection. Int J Gynecol Obstet 92 3 (2006) 333-334