A spatial sampling mechanism for effective background subtraction

VISAPP 2007 - 2nd International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, Proceedings

Volumn IU, Issue MTSV/-, 2007, Pages 403-410

  Cristani, Marco ^a   Murino, Vittorio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Background subtraction; Mixture of Gaussian; Video surveillance

Indexed keywords

BACKGROUND INFORMATION; BACKGROUND SUBTRACTION; MIXTURE OF GAUSSIAN; PIXEL STATISTICS; PIXEL VALUES; REAL TIME; SAMPLING MECHANISMS; SPATIAL SAMPLING; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; STRUCTURED BACKGROUND; VIDEO SURVEILLANCE;

COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LABELS; MIXTURES; MONITORING; PIXELS; SAMPLING; VIDEO AMPLIFIERS;

SECURITY SYSTEMS;

EID: 67650257970     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. H. Wang, D. S. (2005). A re-evaluation of mixture of gaus-sian background modeling. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005 (ICASSP '05), volume 2, pages ii/1017-ii/1020.
2. Heikkila, M. and M.Pietikainen (2006). A texture-based method for modeling the background and detecting moving objects. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Much. In-tell.,28(4):657-662.
3. Isard, M. and Blake, A. (1998). CONDENSATION: Conditional density propagation for visual tracking. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 29(l):5-28.
4. Kottow, D., Koppen, M., and del Solar, J. (2004). A background maintenance model in the spatial-range domain. In ECCV Workshop SMVP, pages 141-152.
5. Mittal, A. and Paragios, N. (2004). Motion-based background subtraction using adaptive kernel density estimation. In CVPR '04: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 302-309. IEEE Computer Society.
6. Nakai, H. (1995). Non-parameterized bayes decision method for moving object detection. In Proc. Second Asian Conf. Computer Vision, pages 447-451.
7. Noriega, P. and Bernier, O. (2006). Real time illumination invariant background subtraction using local kernel histograms. In Proc. of the British Machine Vision Conference.
8. Ohta, N. (2001). A statistical approach to background subtraction for surveillance systems. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 481-1-86.
9. Stauffer, C. and Grimson, W. (1999). Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '99), volume 2, pages 246-252.
10. Stenger, B., nad N. Paragios, V. R., F.Coetzee, and Buh-mann, J. M. (2001). Topology free hidden Markov models: Application to background modeling. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision, volume 1, pages 294-301.
11. Toyama, K., Krumm, J., Brumitt, B., and Meyers, B. (1999). Wallflower: Principles and practice of background maintenance. In Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pages 255-261.
12. Wang, H. and Suter, D. (2006). Background subtraction based on a robust consensus method. In ICPR '06: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06), pages 223-226, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
13. Wren, C, Azarbayejani, A., Darrell, T, and Pentland, A. (1997). Pfinder: Real-time tracking of the human body. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7):780-785.