Statistical models for automatic performance tuning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2073, Issue , 2001, Pages 117-126

  Vuduc, Richard ^a   Demmel, James W ^a   Bilmes, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

AUTOMATIC PERFORMANCE TUNING; AUTOMATIC TUNING; FAST IMPLEMENTATION; HARDWARE PLATFORM; MATRIX MULTIPLY; PEAK PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE DATA; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 67650257712     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45545-0_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. J. Bilmes, K. Asanović, C. Chin, and J. Demmel. Optimizing matrix multiply using PHiPAC: a Portable, High-Performance, ANSI C coding methodology. In Proc. of the Int’l Conf. on Supercomputing, Vienna, Austria, July 1997.
2. J. Bilmes, K. Asanović, J. Demmel, D. Lam, and C. Chin. The PHiPAC v1.0 matrix-multiply distribution. Technical Report UCB/CSD-98-1020, University of California, Berkeley, October 1998.
3. Z. W. Birnbaum. Numerical tabulation of the distribution of Kolmogorov’s statistic for finite sample size. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 47:425–441, September 1952.
4. E. Brewer. High-level optimization via automated statistical modeling. In Sym. Par. Alg. Arch., Santa Barbara, California, July 1995.
5. J. Dongarra, J. D. Croz, I. Duff, and S. Hammarling. A set of level 3 basic linear algebra subprograms. ACM Trans. Math. Soft., 16(1):1–17, March 1990.
6. M. Frigo and S. Johnson. FFTW: An adaptive software architecture for the FFT. In Proc. of the Int’l Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 1998.
7. G. Haentjens. An investigation of recursive FFT implementations. Master’s thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000.
8. E.-J. Im and K. Yelick. Optimizing sparse matrix vector multiplication on SMPs. In Proc. of the 9th SIAM Conf. on Parallel Processing for Sci. Comp., March 1999.
9. M. I. Jordan. Why the logistic function? Technical Report 9503, MIT, 1995.
10. T. Kisuki, P. M. Knijnenburg, M. F. O’Boyle, and H. Wijshoff. Iterative compilation in program optimization. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Compilers for Parallel Computers, pages 35–44, 2000.
11. C. Lawson, R. Hanson, D. Kincaid, and F. Krogh. Basic linear algebra subprograms for Fortran usage. ACM Trans. Math. Soft., 5:308–323, 1979.
12. D. A. Schwartz, R. R. Judd, W. J. Harrod, and D. P. Manley. VSIPL 1.0 API, March 2000. www.vsipl.org.
13. B. Singer and M. Veloso. Learning to predict performance from formula modeling and training data. In Proc. of the 17th Int’l Conf. on Mach. Learn., 2000.
14. S. S. Vadhiyar, G. E. Fagg, and J. Dongarra. Automatically tuned collective operations. In Proceedings of Supercomputing 2000, November 2000.
15. V. N. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1998.
16. R. Vuduc, J. Demmel, and J. Bilmes. Statistical modeling of feedback data in an automatic tuning system. In MICRO-33: Third ACM Workshop on Feedback- Directed Dynamic Optimization, December 2000.
17. C. Whaley and J. Dongarra. Automatically tuned linear algebra software. In Proc. of Supercomp., 1998.