|
Volumn 181, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 637-643
|
Comparison of two automatic evaluation methods on Images of the CDMAM test phantom;Vergleich zweier automatischer Verfahren zur Auswertung von CDMAM-Prüfkörperaufnahmen.
a a a
a
Campus Deutz
(Germany)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
GERMANY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
IMAGE PROCESSING;
IMAGE QUALITY;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
METHODOLOGY;
QUALITY CONTROL;
RADIATION DOSE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
BENCHMARKING;
GERMANY;
HUMANS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
PHANTOMS, IMAGING;
QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;
RADIATION DOSAGE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SOFTWARE;
|
EID: 67650254452
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14389010
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109348 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (0)
|