Uncertainties in the anti-neutrino production at nuclear reactors

Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Djurcic, Z ^a   Detwiler, J A ^b   Piepke, A ^c   Foster, V R ^d   Miller, L ^e,f   Gratta, G ^e  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^d PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Sierra Nevada Corp   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650243235     PISSN: 09543899     EISSN: 13616471     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/36/4/045002     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Bemporad C, Gratta G and Vogel P 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 297
2. McKeown R D and Vogel P 2004 Phys. Rep. 394 315
3. Fogli G L et al 2006 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57 742
4. Gonzalez-Garcia M C and Maltoni M 2008 Phys. Rep. 460 1
5. Eguchi K et al 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 021802
6. Eguchi K et al 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 081801
7. Abe S et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 221803
8. Wolfenstein L 1978 Phys. Rev. D 17 2369
9. Mikheyev S P and Smirnov A Y 1985 Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42 13
10. Apollonio M et al 2003 Eur. Phys. J. C 27 331
11. Boehm F et al 2001 Phys. Rev. D 64 112001
12. Anderson K et al 2004 arXiv:hep-ex/0402041v1
13. Ardellier F et al 2006 arXiv:hep-ex/0606025v4
14. Guo X et al 2007 arXiv:hep-ex/0701029v1
15. Anjos J C et al 2006 Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 155 231
16. Kim S B 2008 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 120 052025
17. Barbeau P S, Collar J I and Tench O 2007 J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP09(2007)009
18. Bernstein A et al 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 91 4672
19. Bernstein A et al 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 074905
20. Kopeikin V I et al 2001 Phys. Atom. Nucl. 64 849
21. Miller L 2001 PhD Thesis Stanford University
22. Schreckenbach K et al 1985 Phys. Lett. B 160 325
23. Hahn A A et al 1989 Phys. Lett. B 218 365
24. Vogel P 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 025504
25. Vogel P, Schenter G K, Mann F M and Schenter R E 1981 Phys. Rev. C 24 1543
26. Declais Y et al 1994 Phys. Lett. B 338 383
27. Nakajima K et al 2006 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 569 837
28. Djurcic Z 2004 PhD Thesis University of Alabama
29. Shultis J K and Faw R E 2002 Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)
30. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2004 Non-proprietary Version of the Final Report of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter Allegation Task Group regarding the Westinghouse/AMAG Crossflow Ultrasonic Flow Meter
31. Diablo Canyon Power Plant 1985 Unit NOs 1 and 2 High Accuracy Heat Balance internal document
32. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1986 NRC Inspection Manual Inspection Procedure 61706: Core Thermal Power Evaluation
33. Parry W T et al 2000 ASME International Steam Tables for Industrial Use (New York: ASME Press)
34. IAPWS 2007 Revised release on the IAPWS industrial formulation 1997 for the thermodynamic properties of water and steam, available at http://www.iapws.org/release.htm (accessed March 1, 2009)
35. Caldon Inc. 2000 Calibration for Beaver valley unit 2 LEFM CheckPlus system ML129 (Conneticut: Caldon Inc.)
36. Takamoto M and Andersson A 2007 What is the volume of one liter? IAEA Technical Meeting on Increasing Power Output and Performance of Nuclear Power Plants by Improved Instrumentation and Control Systems Prague, Czech Republic)
37. Foster V R (Jr) 2001 Flow Control: The Magazine of Fluid Handling Systems vol VII 8
38. Lynnworth L C 1989 Ultrasonic Measurements For Process Control: Theory, Techniques, Applications (San Diego: Academic)
39. General Electric Co. 1977 General electric BWR thermal analysis basis (GETAB): data, correlation and design application NEDO-10958-A (Kanagawa: NEDO)
40. Caldon Inc. 2002 Caldon experience in nuclear feedwater flow measurements ML162 Rev. 1 (Conneticut: Caldon Inc.)
41. Estrada H 1996 An assessment of the integrity and accuracy of feedwater flow and temperature measurements TP11 Rev. 2 (Conneticut: Caldon Inc.)
42. IAEA 2004 Implications of power uprates on safety margins of nuclear power plants TECDOC-1418 (New York: IAEA)
43. US Code of Federal Regulations 2000 Emergency core cooling system evaluation models Title 10, Part 50, Appendix K
44. Hokkaido Electric Power 1986 Tomari Nuclear Power Plant (Units 1, 2) License Application (in Japanese)
45. Foster V R (Jr) 2001 Flow Control: The Magazine of Fluid Handling Systems vol VII No. 6 p 16
46. Caldon Inc. 1998 Improving thermal power accuracy and plant safety while increasing operating power level using the LEFM system ER-80P Rev. 0 (Conneticut: Caldon Inc.)
47. Estrada H 1996 Identifying and bounding the uncertainties in LEFM flow measurements Caldon Inc. TP-13 (Conneticut: Caldon Inc.)
48. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2007 NRC staff position on use of the Westinghouse cross-flow ultrasonic flow meter for power uprate or power recovery 2007-24
49. Spitzer D W 2001 Flow Measurement: The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park
50. EPRI 1999 Nuclear feedwater flow measurement application guide TR-112118 (California: EPRI)
51. Furuichi N 2005 AIST Bulletin of Metrology vol II No. 3 p 569 (in Japanese)
52. Furuichi N et al 2007 A facility with high reynolds number for calibration of a feedwater flowmeter ICONE 15-10209 (Orlando: ICONE)
53. Sanders C E and Gauld I C 2003 Isotopic analysis of high-burnup PWR spent fuel samples from the Takahama-3 reactor ORNL/TM-2001/259 (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
54. Gauld I C 2003 Strategies for application of isotopic uncertainties in burnup credit NUREG/CR-6811, ORNL/TM-2001/257 (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
55. Combustion Engineering Inc. User's Manual for ROCS CE-CES-4-Rev. 3-P (Stamford: Combustion Engineering Inc.)
56. Lee E K et al 1999 Ann. Nucl. Energy 26 983
57. Suyama K et al 2002 J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 39 82
58. Suyama K, Mochizuki H and Kiyosumu T 2002 Nucl. Technol. 138 97
59. Nakahara Y et al 2002 Nucl. Techol. 137 111
60. Guenther R J et al 1991 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report PNL-5109-104 (Richland: PNNL)
61. Burk D E and Thesis M S 2005 Texas A & M University
62. American Society for Testing And Materials 1996 Standard test method for atom percent fission in uranium and plutonium fuel (Neodymium-148 Method) E321 (West Conshohocken: PNNL)
63. Energy Information Administration 2002 Nuclear fuel data Form RW-859 2002 (Washington, DC: EIA) available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/spent- fuel/ussnftab3.html (accessed March 1, 2009)
64. Hermann O W et al 1995 Validation of the SCALE system for PWR spent fuel isotopic composition analysis ORNL/TM-12667 (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
65. Hermann O W and DeHart M D 1998 Validation of SCALE (SAS2H) isotopic predictions for BWR spent fuel ORNL/TM-13315 (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
66. DeHart M D and Hermann O W 1996 An extension of SCALE (SAS2H) isotopic predictions for PWR spent fuel ORNL/TM-13317 (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
67. ORNL 1999 Benchmark of SCALE (SASH2) isotopic predictions of depletion analysis for San Onofre PWR MOX fuel ORNL/TM-1999/326 (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
68. Nakahara Y, Suyama K and Suzuki T 2000 Translation of technical development on burn-up credit for spent LWR fuel (JAERI-Tech 2000-071) ORNL/TR-2001/01, 2001 (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
69. DeHart M D, Brady M C and Parks C V 1996 OECD/NEA burnup credit criticality benchmark phase I-B results (ORNL-6901) (Oak Ridge: ORNL)
70. Nakahara Y et al 1990 Radiochim. Acta 50 141
71. Zacek G et al 1986 Phys. Rev. D 34 2621
72. Declais Y et al 1994 Phys. Lett. B 338 383