Shaping a novel security approach in chemical industrial clusters to prevent large-scale domino events

Security Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 119-142

  Reniers, Genserik L L ^a   Dullaert, Wout ^a   Soudan, Karel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Chemical cluster security; Industrial area security; Security manning levels; Security staffi ng arrangesments; Security vulnerability analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650237395     PISSN: 09551662     EISSN: 17434645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.sj.8350075     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Chemistry Council (2001) Site Security Guidelines for the U.S. Chemical Industry, Arlington: ACC, American Chemistry Council.
2. American Chemistry Council (2006) Responsible Care ® Security Code of Management Practices, Arlington: ACC, American Chemistry Council.
3. Arendt, J. S. and Lorenzo, D. K. (2000) Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), American Institute for Chemical Engineers.
4. ASIS International (2003) General Security Risk Assessment Guideline. Alexandria, VA: ASIS International.
5. ASIS International (2004a) Chief Security Officer Guideline. Alexandria, VA: ASIS International.
6. ASIS International (2004b) Private Security Officer Selection and Training Guideline. Alexandria, VA: ASIS International.
7. ASIS International (2005) Business Continuity Guideline. Alexandria, VA: ASIS International.
8. Brabazon, P. and Conlin, H. (2001) Assessing the Safety of Staffing Arrangements for Process Operations in the Chemical and Allied Industries. London: Health and Safety Executive, HMSO.
9. CCPS, Center for Chemical Process Safety (2003) Guidelines for Analyzing and Managing the Security Vulnerabilities of Fixed Chemical Sites. New York: CCPS, Center for Chemical Process Safety.
10. Child, J., Faulkner, D. and Tallman, S. (2005) Cooperative Strategy: Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Delvosalle, C. (1996) Domino effects phenomena: Definition, Overview and Classification. In Proceedings of the European Seminar on Domino effects. Brussels: FOD WASO, Direction Chemical Risks.
12. Fortis, M. and Maggioni, M. A. (2002) Competitive and Synergic Behaviours in the Development of Industrial Clusters: Ecological Modelling and Empirical Evidence. In Curzio A.Q. and Fortis M. (eds) Complexity and Industrial Clusters, Dynamics and Models in Theory and Practice. Wurzburg: Physica-Verlag.
13. Kieser, A. and Kubicek, H. (1992) Organisation. Berlin: de Gruyter.
14. Kirchsteiger, C. (1998) Absolute and Relative Ranking Approaches for Comparing and Communicating Industrial Accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 59, No. 1, pp 31 - 54.
15. Kirchsteiger, C. (2003) Industrial Risk Management and International Agreements. International Journal of Emergency Management. Vol. 1, No. 3, pp 247 - 267.
16. Reniers, G. L. L. (2006) Shaping an Integrated Cluster Safety Culture in the Chemical Process Industry. Doctoral Dissertation, Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen, 415pp.
17. Reniers, G. L. L., Dullaert, W., Ale, B. J. M. and Soudan, K. (2005a) The Use of Current Risk Analysis Tools Evaluated Towards Preventing External Domino Accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Vol. 18, No. 3, pp 119 - 126.
18. Reniers, G. L. L., Dullaert, W., Ale, B. J. M. and Soudan, K. (2005b) Developing an External Domino Accident Prevention Framework: Hazwim. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Vol. 18, No. 3, pp 127 - 138.