Interaction beliefs : A way to understand emergent organizational behaviour

ICEIS 2007 - 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Proceedings

Volumn SAIC, Issue , 2007, Pages 241-248

  Stuit, Marco ^a   Szirbik, Nick B ^a   De Snoo, Cees ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agent beliefs; Agents; Business process interactions; Protocols

Indexed keywords

AGENT-ORIENTED MODELLING; BUSINESS INTERACTIONS; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS INTERACTIONS; COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; NEW CONCEPT; PROTOCOLS; RESEARCH TOPICS; WORKFLOW MODELLING;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 67650237143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Adams, M., Edmond, D., & Ter Hofstede, A.H.M., 2003. The application of Activity Theory to Dynamic Workflow Adaptation Issues. Proceedings PACIS-03, 1836-1852.
2. Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., and Mylopoulos, J., 2004. An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 8 (3), 203-236.
3. Brockmans, S., Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A., and Studer, R., 2006. Proceedings ICEIS 2006, 191-196.
4. Eurescom, 2000. Message: Methodology for Engineering Systems of Software Agents, Deliverable 1, Initial Methodology.Project P907-GI.
5. Ekdahl, B., 2000. Agents as Anticipatory Systems. Proceedings SCI2000 andISAS 2000, 133-137.
6. Klein, M., Dellarocas, C, & Bernstein, A., 2000. Introduction to the special issue on adaptive workflow systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9 (3-4), 265-267.
7. Köhler, M., Moldt, D., & Rölke, H., 2001. Modelling the Structure and Behaviour of Petri Net Agents. LNCS, 2075, 224-241.
8. Lee, R.M., 1999. Distributed Electronic Trade Scenarios: Representation, Design, and Prototyping. Electronic Commerce, 3, 105-136.
9. Meyer, G.G., & Szirbik, N.B., 2006. Behaviour Alignment as a Mechanism for Anticipatory Agent Interaction. Proceedings ABiALS 2006. Available from: http://www.rug.nl/staff/g.g.meyer/p4.pdf?as=pdf
10. Padgham, L., & Winikoff, M., 2003. Prometheus: A Methodology for Developing Intelligent Agents. LNCS, 2585, 174-185.
11. Reijers, H.A., Rigter, J.H.M., & Van der Aalst, W.M.P., 2003. The Case Handling Case. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 12 (3), 365-391.
12. Roest, G.B., & Szirbik, N.B., 2006. Intervention and Escape Mode: Involving Stake-holders in the Agent Development Process. Proceedings AOSE-06, 109-120.Available from: http://www.rug.nl/staff/g.b.roest/ GijsBRoest&NickBSzirbik-Escape-Intervention.pdf?as=pdf
13. Stuit, M., & Szirbik, N.B., 2006. Embodied Interactions: a Way to Model and Execute Complex and Changing Business Processes with Agents. Proceedings ESAW06, 169-184. Available from: http://www.rug.nl/staff/m. stuit/p3.pdf?as=pdf
14. Van der Aalst, W.M.P, 2000a. Loosely coupled interorganizational workflows: modeling and analyzing workflows crossing organizational boundaries. Information & Management, 37 (2), 67-75.
15. Van der Aalst, W.M.P., 2000b. Exterminating the Dynamic Change Bug: A Concrete Approach to Support Change. Beta Working paper Series, WP 51, Eindhoven University of Technology.
16. Van der Aalst, W.M.P., 2003. Inheritance of Business Processes: A Journey Visiting Four Notorious Problems. LNCS, 2472, 383-408.
17. Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Ter Hofstede, A.H.M., and Weske, M., 2003b. Business Process Management: A Survey. LNCS, 2678, 1-12.
18. Wagner, G., 2003. The Agent-Object-Relationship metamodel: towards a unified view of state and behavior. Information Systems, 28 (5), 475-504.
19. Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC), 1999. WFMC:Terminology & Glossary. WFMC, Document Number WFMC-TC-1011.
20. Xu, H., & Shatz, S.M., 2001. An Agent-Based Petri Net Model with Application to Seller/Buyer Design in Electronic Commerce. Proceedings ISADS-01, 11-18.
21. Yan, Y., Maamar, Z., & Shen, W., 2001. Integration of Workflow and Agent Technology for Business Process Management. Proceedings CSCWD-01, 420-426.