Statistical analysis of second-order relations of 3D structures

VISAPP 2007 - 2nd International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, Proceedings

Volumn IU, Issue MTSV/-, 2007, Pages 13-20

  Kalkan, Sinan ^a   Wörgötter, Florentin ^a   Krüger, Norbert ^b  

^a Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience   (Germany)

^b Unv of Southern Denmark   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Indirect depth estimation; Range data statistics

Indexed keywords

3D RECONSTRUCTION; 3D STRUCTURE; COPLANARITY; DEPTH EXTRAPOLATION; HOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURE; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM; IMAGE PATCHES; IMAGE STRUCTURES; INDIRECT DEPTH ESTIMATION; PREDICTION MODEL; RANGE DATA; RANGE DATA STATISTICS; SECOND ORDERS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 67650236883     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bolle, R. M. and Vemuri, B. C. (1991). On three-dimensional surface reconstruction methods. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(1): 1-13.
2. Bruce, V., Green, P. R., and Georgeson, M. A. (2003). Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology.Psychology Press, 4th edition.
3. Brunswik, E. and Kamiya, J. (1953). Ecological cuevalidity of 'proximity' and of other Gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychologie, LXVL:20-32.
4. Elder, H. and Goldberg, R. (2002). Ecological statistics of gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision, 2(4):324-353.
5. Elder, J. H., Krupnik, A., and Johnston, L. A. (2003). Contour grouping with prior models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(25): 1-14.
6. Grimson, W. E. L. (1983). Surface consistency constraints in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 24( 1) :28-51.
7. Hoover, A., Jean-Baptiste, G., Jiang, X., Flynn, P. J., Bunke, H., Goldgof, D. B., Bowyer, K., Eggert, D. W., Fitzgibbon, A., and Fisher, R. B. (1996). An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(7):673-689.
8. Howe, C. Q. and Purves, D. (2002). Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length. PNAS, 99(20):13184-13188.
9. Howe, C. Q. and Purves, D. (2004). Size contrast and assimilation explained by the statistics of natural scene geometry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(1):90-102.
10. Huang, J., Lee, A. B., and Mumford, D. (2000). Statistics of range images. CVPR, 1(1):1324-1331.
11. Kalkan, S., Wörgötter, F, and Kr̈ger, N. (2006). Statistical analysis of local 3d structure in 2d images. CVPR, 1:1114-1121.
12. Knill, D. C. and Richards, W., editors (1996). Perception as bayesian inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kr̈ger, N. (1998). Collinearity and parallelism are statistically significant second order relations of complex cell responses. Neural Processing Letters, 8(2):117-129.
14. Kr̈ger, N., Lappe, M., and Wörgötter, F. (2003). Biologically motivated multi-modal processing of visual primitives. Proc. the AISB 2003 Symposium on Biologically inspired Machine Vision, Theory and Application, Wales, pages 53-59.
15. Kr̈ger, N. and Wörgötter, F. (2004). Statistical and deterministic regularities: Utilisation of motion and grouping in biological and artificial visual systems. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 131:82-147.
16. Kr̈ger, N. and Wörgötter, F. (2005). Multi-modal primitives as functional models of hyper-columns and their use for contextual integration. Proc. 1st Int. Symposium on Brain, Vision and Artificial Intelligence, Naples, Italy, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, LNCS 3704, pages 157-166.
17. Olshausen, B. and Field, D. (1996). Natural image statistics and efficient coding. Network, 7:333-339.
18. Potetz, B. and Lee, T. S. (2003). Statistical correlations between two-dimensional images and three-dimensional structures in natural scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 20(7):1292-1303.
19. Pugeault, N., Krüger, N., and Wörgötter, F. (2004). A nonlocal stereo similarity based on collinear groups. Proceedings of the Fourth International ICSC Symposium on Engineering of Intelligent Systems.
20. Purves, D. and Lotto, B., editors (2002). Why we see what we do: an empirical theory of vision.Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
21. Rao, R. P. N., Olshausen, B. A., and Lewicki, M. S., editors (2002). Probabilistic models of the brain. MA: MIT Press.
22. Shirai, Y. (1987). Three-dimensional computer vision.Springer- Verlag New York, Inc.
23. Yang, Z. and Purves, D. (2003). Image/source statistics of surfaces in natural scenes. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14:371-390.
24. Zhu, S. C. (1999). Embedding gestalt laws in markov random fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21 (11):1170-1187.