Sexual risk-taking among adult dating couples in the United States

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 74-83

  Billy, John O G ^a   Grady, William R ^a   Sill, Morgan E ^b  

^a BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Research Resource Development   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK FACTOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); RISK FACTORS; RISK-TAKING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650224421     PISSN: 15386341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/4107409     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Forste R and Tanfer K, Sexual exclusivity among dating, cohabiting, and married women, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1996, 58 (1 33 47. (Pubitemid 126469212)
2. Blumstein P and Schwartz P, American Couples: Money, Work, Sex, New York : William Morrow, 1983.
3. Harvey SM et al., Relationship power, sexual decision making and condom use among women at risk for HIV/STDs, Women and Health, 2002, 36 (4 69 84. (Pubitemid 36175605)
4. Ochs E and Binik Y, The use of couple data to determine the reliability of self-reported sexual behavior, Journal of Sex Research, 1999, 36 (4 374 384. (Pubitemid 30026973)
5. Harvey SM et al., He said, she said: concordance between sexual partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2004, 31 (3 185 191. (Pubitemid 38252904)
6. Seal D, Interpartner concordance of self-reported sexual behavior among college dating couples, Journal of Sex Research, 1997, 34 (1 39 55. (Pubitemid 27328644)
7. Beckman LJ, Husbands' and wives' relative influence on fertility decisions and outcomes, Population and Environment, 1984, 7 (3 182 197.
8. Greene ME and Biddlecom AE, Absent and problematic men: demographic accounts of male reproductive roles, Population and Development Review, 2000, 26 (1 81 115. (Pubitemid 30309622)
9. Miller WB and Pasta DJ, The relative influence of husbands and wives on the choice and use of oral contraception, diaphragm, and condoms, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1996, 26 (19 1749 1774.
10. Miller WB et al., Tubal ligation or vasectomy: how do married couples make the choice? Fertility and Sterility, 1991, 56 (2 278 284.
11. Severy LJ and Silver SE, Two reasonable people: joint decisionmaking in contraceptive choice and use, in : Severy LJ, ed., Advances in Population: Psychosocial Perspectives, London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1994, pp. 207 227.
12. Sobel ME and Arminger G, Modeling household fertility decisions: a nonlinear simultaneous probit model, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1992, 87 (417 38 47.
13. Thomson E, Dyadic models of contraceptive choice, in : Brinberg D and Jaccard JJ, eds., Dyadic Decision Making, New York : SpringerVerlag, 1989.
14. Thomson E, Fertility desires and fertility: hers, his and theirs, Demography, 1990, 27 (4 579 588.
15. Thomson E, Couple childbearing desires, intentions and births, Demography, 1997, 34 (3 343 354.
16. Katz BP et al., Partner-specific relationship characteristics and condom use among young people with sexually transmitted disease, Journal of Sex Research, 2000, 37 (1 69 75. (Pubitemid 30642958)
17. Ku L et al., The dynamics of young men's condom use during and across relationships, Family Planning Perspectives, 1994, 26 (6 246 251.
18. Amaro H and Raj A, On the margin: power and women's HIV risk reduction strategies, Sex Roles, 2000, 42 (7/8 723 749.
19. Logan T et al., Women, sex, and HIV: social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research, Psychological Bulletin, 2002, 128 (6 851 885.
20. Soler HD et al., Relationship dynamics, ethnicity and condom use among low-income women, Family Planning Perspectives, 2000, 32 (2 82 101.
21. Pulerwitz J et al., Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research, Sex Roles, 2000, 42 (7/8 637 660.
22. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS and Atwood KA, Safer sex and sexually transmitted infections from a relationship perspective, in : Harvey J et al., eds., The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships, Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004, pp. 519 544.
23. Sheeran PC et al., Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: a meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125 (1 90 132.
24. Harris KM, Design features of Add Health, unpublished manuscript, Chapel Hill, NC : Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2005.
25. Christopher F and Sprecher S, Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: a decade review, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 2000, 62 (4 999 1017.
26. DeLamater J and Hyde J, Conceptual and theoretical issues in studying sexuality in close relationships, in : Harvey J et al., eds., The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships, Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004, pp. 7 30.
27. Agnew CR, Power over interdependent behavior within the dyad: who decides what a couple does? in : Severy LJ and Miller WB, eds., Advances in Population: Psychosocial Perspectives, Vol. 3, London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1999, pp. 163 188.
28. Becker S, Couples and reproductive health: a review of couple studies, Studies in Family Planning, 1996, 27 (6 291 306.
29. Miller WB, Reproductive decisions: how we make them and how they make us, in : Severy LJ, ed., Advances in Population: Psychosocial Perspectives, Vol. 2, London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1994, pp. 1 27.
30. Vohs K et al., Sex in 'his' versus 'her' relationships, in : Harvey J et al., eds., The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships, Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004, pp. 455 474.
31. Sprecher S and Felmlee D, The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from 'his' and 'her' perspectives, Sex Roles, 1997, 37 (5/6 361 379.
32. Presser HB, Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender, American Sociological Review, 1994, 59 (3 349 364.
33. Ross CE, The division of labor at home, Social Forces, 1987, 65 (3 816 833.
34. Lucke JC, Gender roles and sexual behavior among young women, Sex Roles, 1998, 39 (3/4 273 297. (Pubitemid 128366086)
35. Shearer CL et al., Are traditional gender role attitudes associated with risky sexual behavior and condom-related beliefs? Sex Roles, 2005, 52 (5/6 311 324. (Pubitemid 40579627)
36. Drigotas SM and Rusbult CE, Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment and couple well-being, Personal Relationships, 1999, 6 (3 389 409.
37. Howard JA et al., Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51 (1 102 109.
38. Halperin DT, Heterosexual anal intercourse: prevalence, cultural factors, and HIV infection and other health risks, part I, AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 1999, 13 (12 717 730. (Pubitemid 30016740)
39. Mayer KH and Anderson DJ, Heterosexual HIV transmission, Infectious Agents and Disease, 1995, 4 (4 273 284. (Pubitemid 26002080)
40. Udry JR, The marital happiness/disruption relationship by level of marital alternatives, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1983, 45 (1 221 222.
41. King LA and King DW, Sex Role Egalitarianism Scale, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1997, 21 (1 71 87.
42. Catania JA et al., The assessment of locus of control: situational specificity in the sexual context, Journal of Sex Research, 1984, 20 (3 310 324.
43. Blood RO and Wolfe DM, Husbands and Wives, New York : The Free Press, 1960.
44. Rubin DB, Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York : John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
45. Schafer JL, Multiple Imputation: A Primer, London : Chapman and Hall, 1997.
46. Billy JOG et al., The sexual behavior of men in the United States, Family Planning Perspectives, 1993, 25 (2 52 60. (Pubitemid 23115466)
47. Laumann EO et al., The Social Organization of Sexuality, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1994.
48. Grady WR et al., Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women, Family Planning Perspectives, 1999, 31 (4 168 175. (Pubitemid 29344740)
49. Tanfer K et al., Condom use among U.S. men, 1991, Family Planning Perspectives, 1993, 25 (2 61 66. (Pubitemid 23115467)
50. Kelly J and Kalichman S, Increased attention to human sexuality can improve HIV-AIDS prevention efforts: key research issues and directions, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1995, 63 (6 907 918.
51. El-Bassel N et al., HIV prevention for intimate couples: a relationship-based model, Families, Systems, and Health, 2001, 19 (4 379 395. (Pubitemid 34081481)
52. El-Bassel N et al., The efficacy of a relationship-based HIV/STD prevention program for heterosexual couples, American Journal of Public Health, 2003, 93 (6 963 969. (Pubitemid 38480230)
53. Harvey SM et al., A randomized study of a pregnancy and disease prevention intervention for Hispanic couples, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2004, 36 (4 162 169. (Pubitemid 39089156)
54. Witte SS, Promoting female condom use to heterosexual couples: findings from a randomized clinical trial, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38 (3 148 154. (Pubitemid 44708104)