Representational bias in unsupervised learning of syllable structure

CoNLL 2005 - Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 112-119

  Goldwater, Sharon ^a   Johnson, Mark ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACHINE LEARNING; MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE; UNSUPERVISED LEARNING;

EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION; INITIAL PARAMETER; LOCAL LIKELIHOOD; RULE BASED ALGORITHMS; SUPERVISED TRAININGS; SYLLABLE STRUCTURES; WORD ACCURACIES;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 67650175763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1706543.1706564     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. R. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock, and L. Gulikers. 1995. The CELEX lexical database (release 2) [cd-rom].
2. M. Banko and R. Moore. 2004. A study of unsupervised partof-speech tagging. In Proceedings of COLING '04.
3. J. Blevins. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In J. Goldsmith, editor, the Handbook of Phonological Theory. Blackwell, Oxford.
4. M. Brent. 1999. An efficient, probabilistically sound algorithm for segmentation and word discovery. Machine Learning, 34:71-105.
5. E. Brill. 1995. Unsupervised learning of disambiguation rules for part of speech tagging. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 1-13.
6. G. Carroll and E. Charniak. 1992. Two experiments on learning probabilistic dependency grammars from corpora. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Statistically-Based Natural Language Processing Techniques, San Jose, CA.
7. J. Elman. 2003. Generalization from sparse input. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
8. S. Geman, E. Bienenstock, and R. Doursat. 1992. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4:1-58.
9. G. A. Kiraz and B. Möbius. 1998. Multilingual syllabification using weighted finite-state transducers. In Proceedings of the Third European Speech Communication Association Workshop on Speech Synthesis.
10. D. Klein and C. Manning. 2001. Distributional phrase structure induction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Natural Language Learning, pages 113-120.
11. D. Klein and C. Manning. 2002. A generative constituentcontext model for improved grammar induction. In Proceedings of the ACL.
12. B. Merialdo. 1994. Tagging english text with a probabilistic model. Computational Linguistics, 20(2):155-172.
13. K. Müller. 2001. Automatic detection of syllable boundaries combining the advantages of treebank and bracketed corpora training. In Proceedings of the ACL.
14. K. Müller. 2002. Probabilistic context-free grammars for phonology. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning at ACL.
15. R. Neal and G. Hinton, 1998. A New View of the EM Algorithm That Justifies Incremental and Other Variants, pages 355-368. Kluwer.
16. A. Prince and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report TR-2, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers Univ.
17. A. van den Bosch, T. Weijters, and W. Daelemans. 1998. Modularity in inductively-learned word pronunciation systems. In NewMethods in Language Processing and Computational Language Learning (NeMLaP3/CoNLL98).
18. A. Venkataraman. 2001. A statistical model for word discovery in transcribed speech. Computational Linguistics, 27(3):351-372.