Examining Instructional Practices of Elementary Science Teachers for Mathematics and Literacy Integration

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 103, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 388-396

  Douville, Patricia ^a   Pugalee, David K ^a   Wallace, Josephine D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650162502     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18124.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dickinson, V. L., & Young, T. A. (1998). Elementary science and language arts: Should we blur the boundaries School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 334-339.
2. Drake, S.M. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
3. Guthrie, J.T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. The Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 344-366.
4. Hand, B., & Yore, L.D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035.
5. International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English and the language arts. Newark, DE: Author.
6. Jacobs, H.H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 191-203.
8. Kain, D. L. (1993). Cabbages and kings: Research directions in integrated/interdisciplinary curriculum. The Journal of Educational Thought, 27(3), 312-331.
9. Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1998). 5 apples + 4 oranges = School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 281-284.
10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. McBride, J. W., & Silverman, F. L. (1991). Integrating elementary/middle school science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 285-292.
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
13. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (1999). North Carolina science education leadership institute. Raleigh, NC: UNC Mathematics and Science Education Network, North Carolina Business Committee for Education, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.
15. Nuthall, G. (1999). The ways students learn: Acquiring knowledge from an integrated science and social studies unit. The Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 303-341.
16. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Post, T. R., Ellis, A. K., Humphreys, A. H., & Buggey, L. J. (1997). Interdisciplinary approaches to the curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
18. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Shoemaker, B. J. E. (1989). Integrative education: A curriculum for the twenty-first century. OSSC Bulletin Series. Eugene, OR: Oregon School Study Council.
20. Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
21. Wersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
22. Wood, K.E. (1997). Interdisciplinary instruction: A practical guide for elementary and middle school teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.