A pilot study of the use and perceived utility of a scale to assess clinical dental teaching within a UK dental school restorative department

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 73-79

  Woolley, S ^a   Emanuel, C ^a   Koshy, B ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Clinical dental teaching; Feedback; Scale

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTAL SURGERY; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DENTISTRY, OPERATIVE; EDUCATION, DENTAL; FEEDBACK; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, DENTAL; STUDENTS, DENTAL; TEACHING;

EID: 67650160044     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00538.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. HEFCE. Learning & teaching: the National Student Survey. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/nss/ (accessed 29 October 2007).
2. Fugill M. Teaching and learning in dental student clinical practice. Eur J Dent Educ 2005: 9: 131-136.
3. Widstrom E, Birn H, Haugerjorden O, Martinson T. Dental students' views on their education and study circumstances. Swed Dent J 1990: 14: 123-129.
4. McGrath C, Wai Kit Yeung R, Comfort MB, McMillan AS. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to evaluate clinical dental teachers (ECDT). Br Dent J 2005: 198: 45-48.
5. Evans JR, Massler M. The effective clinical teacher. J Dent Educ 1977: 41: 613-617.
6. Kidd EAM, Millard L, Smeeton NC, Millard AJ. Improving the quality of teaching: staff responses to student views. Br Dent J 1994: 177: 208-212.
7. Carrotte P. Educating the educators - do university lecturers require training in educational practice? Br Dent J 1994: 177: 217-220.
8. Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Skeff KM. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med 1998: 73: 688-695.
9. Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen HA, Gerver WJ, De Grave W, Scherpbier AJ. Providing physicians with feedback on how they supervise students during patient contacts. Med Teach 2004: 26: 409-414.
10. Wilkerson JR, Lang WS. Assessing teacher dispositions: five standards-based steps to valid measurement using the DAATS model. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2007.
11. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education, 6th edn. London: Routledge, 2007.
12. Shaw IF. Qualitative evaluation. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1999.
13. Choi J, Hannafin M. Situated cognition and learning environments: croles, structures, and implications for design. Educ Technol Res Dev 1995: 43: 53-69.
14. Brown G, Manogue M. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Med Teach 2001: 23: 231-244.
15. Harvey L. Student feedback. Quality in Higher Education. 2003: 9: 3-20.