DECtalk™ and VeriVox™: Intelligibility, likeability, and rate preference differences for four listener groups

AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-18

  Von Berg, Shelley ^a   Panorska, Anna ^b   Uken, Dennis ^b   Qeadan, Fares ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Intelligibility; Speech Presentation Rate; Synthesized Speech

Indexed keywords

AGE GROUPS; INTELLIGIBILITY; INTELLIGIBILITY SCORES; LIKEABILITY; OLDER ADULTS; SYNTHESIZED SPEECH; TEXT TO SPEECH;

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CHILD; COMMUNICATION AID; DECISION MAKING; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE; CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; VOICE QUALITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650157379     PISSN: 07434618     EISSN: 14773848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07434610902728531     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical data analysis, Wiley, New York
2. Allen, J., Hunnicutt, S. and Klatt, D. (1987) From text to speech: The MITalk system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
3. American National Standards Institute (2007) Speech material used in audiology: Word lists for intelligibility testing in paediatric audiology, Washington, DC
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) (2004) Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Technical report. ASHA Supplement, 24
5. Beukelman, D. R., Jones, R. S. and Rowan, M. (1989) Frequency of word usage by nondisabled peers in integrated preschool classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, pp. 243-248.
6. Beukelman, D. R. and Mirenda, P. (1998) Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore
7. Blackstone, S. (1990) Populations and practices in AAC. Augmentative Communication News, 3:4, pp. 1-3.
8. Crabtree, M., Mirenda, P. and Beukelman, D. R. (1990) Age and gender preferences for synthetic and natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, pp. 256-261.
9. Drager, K. D. R. and Reichle, J. E. (2001) Effects of age and divided attention on listeners' comprehension of synthesized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, pp. 109-119.
10. Duffy, S. A. and Pisoni, D. B. (1992) Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: A review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Speech, 35, pp. 351-389.
11. Dunn, L. M. and Dunn, L. M. (1997) Peabody picture vocabulary test-third edition, American Guidance Service, Inc, Circle Pines, MN
12. Fairbanks, G. (1960) Voice and articulation drillbook, Harper & Row, New York
13. Fuller-Thompson, E., Minkler, M. and Driver, D. (1997) A profile of grandparents raising grandchildren in the United States. The Gerontologist, 37:3, pp. 406-411.
14. Fucci, D., Reynolds, M. E., Bettagere, R. and Gonzales, M. D. (1995) Synthetic speech intelligibility under several experimental conditions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, pp. 113-117.
15. Greene, B. G., Logan, J. S. and Pisoni, D. B. (1986) Perception of synthetic speech produced automatically by rule: Intelligibility of eight text-to-speech systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18:2, pp. 100-107.
16. Greene, B. G., Manous, L. M. and Pisoni, D. B. (1984) Perceptual evaluation of DECtalk: Final report on version 1.8. Research on Speech Perception Progress. Report No. 10.Indiana University, Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Bloomington
17. Higginbotham, D. J., Drazek, A. L., Kowarsky, K., Scally, C. and Segal, E. (1994) Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation rates. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, pp. 191-202.
18. Higginbotham, D. J., Scally, C. A., Lundy, D. C. and Kowarsky, K. (1995) Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech across three augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) output methods. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, pp. 889-901.
19. Hirdes, J. P., Ellis-Hale, K. and Pearson Hirdes, B. (1993) Prevalence and policy implications of communication disabilities among adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, pp. 273-280.
20. Hoover, J., Reichle, J., Van Tasell, D. and Cole, D. (1987) The intelligibility of synthesized speech: Echo II versus Votrax. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, pp. 425-431.
21. House, A. S., Williams, C. E., Hecker, M. H. L. and Kryter, K. D. (1965) Articulation-testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, pp. 158-166.
22. Humes, L. E., Nelson, K. J., Pisoni, D. B. and Lively, S. E. (1993) Effects of age on serial recall of natural and synthetic speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, pp. 634-639.
23. Hustad, K. C., Kent, R. D. and Beukelman, D. R. (1998) DECtalk and MacinTalk speech synthesizers: Intelligibility differences for three listener groups. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, pp. 744-752.
24. Johnson, R. A. and Wichern, D. W. (2002) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
25. Koul, R. (2003) Synthetic speech perception in individuals with and without disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19:1, pp. 49-58.
26. Koul, R. K. and Allen, G. D. (1993) Segmental intelligibility and speech interference thresholds of high-quality synthetic speech in presence of noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, pp. 790-798.
27. Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, pp. 159-174.
28. Lock, S. and Leong, C. K. (1989) Program library for DECtalk text-to-speech system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, pp. 394-400.
29. Logan, J. S., Pisoni, D. B. and Greene, B. G. (1985) Measuring the segmental intelligibility of speech: Results from eight text-to-speech systems. Research on speech perception progress report no. 11, Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
30. Mirenda, P. and Beukelman, D. R. (1987) A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, pp. 120-128.
31. Mirenda, P. and Beukelman, D. R. (1990) A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, pp. 61-68.
32. Mirenda, P., Eicher, D. and Beukelman, D. R. (1989) Synthetic and natural speech preferences of male and female listeners in four age groups. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, pp. 175-183.
33. Mirenda, P. and Mathy-Laikko, P. (1989) Augmentative and alternative communication applications for persons with severe congenital communication disorders: An introduction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, pp. 3-13.
34. Reynolds, M. E. and Fucci, D. (1998) Synthetic speech comprehension: A comparison of children with normal and impaired language skills. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, pp. 458-466.
35. Reynolds, M. E., Isaacs-Duvall, C. and Haddox, M. L. (2002) A comparison of learning curves in natural and synthesized speech comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, pp. 802-810.
36. Rupprecht, S. L., Beukelman, D. R. and Vrtiska, H. (1995) Comparative intelligibility of five synthesized voices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, pp. 244-247.
37. Schwartz, R., Klovstad, J., Makhoul, J., Klatt, D. and Zue, V. Diphone synthesis for phonetic vocoding. [Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing] IEEE Institute, pp. 891-894.
38. Sutton, B., King, J., Hux, K. and Beukelman, D. R. (1995) Younger and older adults' rate performance when listening to synthetic speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, pp. 147-153.
39. Van Riper, C. (1963) Speech correction: Principles and methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
40. Venkatagiri, H. S. (1996) The quality of digitized and synthesized speech: What clinicians should know. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5:4, pp. 31-42.
41. Venkatagiri, H. S. and Ramabadran, T. V. (1995) Digital speech synthesis: Tutorial. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, pp. 14-25.
42. Wepman, J. M. and Hass, W. (1969) A spoken word count: Children ages 5, 6 and 7, Language Research Associates, Chicago
43. Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G. and Pond, R. E. (2002) Preschool language scale-fourth edition, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX