Radiographic absorptiometry as a screening tool in male osteoporosis: Results from the odense androgen study

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 658-663

  Hansen, S J ^a   Nielsen, M M F ^a   Ryg, J ^a   Wraae, K ^a   Andersen, M ^a   Brixen, K ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Men; Osteoporosis; Phalangeal; Radiographic absorptiometry; Reference values; Screening; Skeletal appendicular; Skeletal axial

Indexed keywords

BONE MINERAL DENSITY; MEN; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHALANGEAL; RADIOGRAPHIC ABSORPTIOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUES; SKELETAL APPENDICULAR; SKELETAL AXIAL;

BONE; LIGHT ABSORPTION; MINERALS; MINING; SILICATE MINERALS;

DIAGNOSIS;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENMARK; EVALUATION; FINGER PHALANX; HIP; HUMAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; BONE DENSITY; COHORT STUDIES; DENMARK; FINGER PHALANGES; HIP; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67650136693     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850902912036     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, Johansson H, Johnell O, Jonsson B, et al. Assessment offracture risk. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:581-9.
2. Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torger-son D. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:390-406.
3. Boonen S, Nijs J, Borghs H, Peeters H, Vanderschueren D, Luyten FP. Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:93-100.
4. Blake GM, Chinn DJ, Steel SA, Patel R, Panayiotou E, Thorpe J, et al. A list ofdevice-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation ofperipheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:2149-56.
5. Assessment offracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994;843:1-129.
6. Hoiberg M, Nielsen TL, Wraae K, Abrahamsen B, Hagen C, Andersen M, et al. Population-based reference values for bone mineral density in young men. Osteoporos Int 2007;18:1507-14.
7. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use ofthe area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
8. Wilder FV, Barrett JP, Farina EJ. Joint-specific prevalence ofosteoarthritis ofthe hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006;14:953-7.
9. Ahmed AI, Blake GM, Rymer JM, Fogelman I. Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis? Osteoporos Int 1997;7:432-8.
10. Kudlacek S, Schneider B, Peterlik M, Leb G, Klaush-ofer K, Weber K, et al. Normative data of bone mineral density in an unselected adult Austrian population. Eur J Clin Invest 2003;33:332-9.
11. Roig-Vilaseca D, Nolla JM, Roig-Escofet D. Suitability ofthe T-score for establishing bone mineral density categories. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:408-10.
12. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, De Laet C, Mellstrom D. Epidemiology ofosteoporosis and fracture in men. CalcifTissue Int 2004;75:90-9.
13. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Dawson-Hughes B, Tucker KL, Cupples LA, Wilson PW, et al. Risk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:710-20.
14. Rud B, Hilden J, Hyldstrup L, Hrobjartsson A. The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review ofaccuracy. Osteoporos Int 2008;[Epub ahead of print].
15. Goemaere S, Zmierczak H, Van Pottelbergh I, Kaufman JM. Ability ofperipheral bone assessments to predict areal bone mineral density at hip in community-dwelling elderly men. J Clin Densitom 2002;5:219-28.
16. Montagnani A, Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Mangeri M, Monaco R, Gennari L, et al. Usefulness of bone quantitative ultrasound in management ofosteoporosis in men. J Clin Densitom 2001;4:231-7.
17. Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Gennari L, Montagnani A, Caffarelli C, Merlotti D, et al. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men. Osteoporos Int 2005;16: 963-8.
18. Jorgensen JT, Andersen PB, Rosholm A, Bjarnason NH. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a new appendicular bone densitometric method with high precision. Clin Physiol 2000;20:330-5.
19. Ward KA, Cotton J, Adams JE. A technical and clinical evaluation ofdigital X-ray radiogrammetry. Osteoporos Int 2003;14:389-95.
20. Black DM, Palermo L, Sorensen T, Jorgensen JT, Lewis C, Tylavsky F, et al. A normative reference database study for Pronosco X-posure System. J Clin Densitom 2001;4:5-12.
21. Bauer DC, Ewing SK, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Cum-mings SR, Orwoll ES. Quantitative ultrasound predicts hip and non-spine fracture in men: the MrOS study. Osteoporos Int 2007;18:771-7.
22. Maggi S, Noale M, Giannini S, Adami S, Defeo D, Isaia G, et al. Quantitative heel ultrasound in a population-based study in Italy and its relationship with fracture history: the ESOPO study. Osteoporos Int 2006;17: 237-44.
23. Bach-Mortensen P, Hyldstrup L, Appleyard M, Hindso K, Gebuhr P, Sonne-Holm S. Digital x-ray radiogrammetry identifies women at risk ofosteoporotic fracture: results from a prospective study. Calcif Tissue Int 2006; 79:1-6.