-
1
-
-
34547361024
-
-
10.1103/RevModPhys.20.367
-
R. P. Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367 (1948). 10.1103/RevModPhys.20.367
-
(1948)
Rev. Mod. Phys.
, vol.20
, pp. 367
-
-
Feynman, R.P.1
-
4
-
-
4243754128
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690
-
C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78. 2690
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.78
, pp. 2690
-
-
Jarzynski, C.1
-
5
-
-
4244116139
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5018
-
C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5018 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5018
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. e
, vol.56
, pp. 5018
-
-
Jarzynski, C.1
-
6
-
-
67650173779
-
-
Lebowitz and Spohn have used the Feynman-Kac and Cameron-Martin-Girsanov formula earlier in proving fluctuation theorem in their important work (p.
-
Lebowitz and Spohn have used the Feynman-Kac and Cameron-Martin-Girsanov formula earlier in proving fluctuation theorem in their important work (p. 350).
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
33746675190
-
-
10.1088/0953-8984/18/32/R01
-
F. Ritort, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, R 531 (2006). 10.1088/0953-8984/18/32/R01
-
(2006)
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
, vol.18
, pp. 531
-
-
Ritort, F.1
-
8
-
-
23844508956
-
-
10.1063/1.2012462
-
C. Bustamante, J. Liphardt, and F. Ritort, Phys. Today 58 (7), 43 (2005). 10.1063/1.2012462
-
(2005)
Phys. Today
, vol.58
, Issue.7
, pp. 43
-
-
Bustamante, C.1
Liphardt, J.2
Ritort, F.3
-
9
-
-
41849094402
-
-
10.1007/s10955-008-9520-4
-
H. Ge and D. Q. Jiang, J. Stat. Phys. 131, 675 (2008). 10.1007/s10955-008-9520-4
-
(2008)
J. Stat. Phys.
, vol.131
, pp. 675
-
-
Ge, H.1
Jiang, D.Q.2
-
12
-
-
0000765761
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721
-
G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2721 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. e
, vol.60
, pp. 2721
-
-
Crooks, G.E.1
-
13
-
-
0000186593
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevE.61.2361
-
G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2361 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.2361
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. e
, vol.61
, pp. 2361
-
-
Crooks, G.E.1
-
14
-
-
18344406027
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3463
-
T. Hatano and S. I. Sasa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3463 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3463
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.86
, pp. 3463
-
-
Hatano, T.1
Sasa, S.I.2
-
16
-
-
27144483816
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.040602
-
U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040602 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95. 040602
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.95
, pp. 040602
-
-
Seifert, U.1
-
17
-
-
23844443839
-
-
10.1088/0305-4470/38/34/L03
-
T. Speck and U. Seifert, J. Phys. A 38, L581 (2005). 10.1088/0305-4470/ 38/34/L03
-
(2005)
J. Phys. A
, vol.38
, pp. 581
-
-
Speck, T.1
Seifert, U.2
-
21
-
-
0040120726
-
-
10.1088/0305-4470/31/16/003
-
J. Kurchan, J. Phys. A 31, 3719 (1998). 10.1088/0305-4470/31/16/003
-
(1998)
J. Phys. A
, vol.31
, pp. 3719
-
-
Kurchan, J.1
-
26
-
-
67650160300
-
-
This normalization requirement of these functions is inessential for our discussion.
-
This normalization requirement of these functions is inessential for our discussion.
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
51349120674
-
-
We noticed that, if the last two terms of Eq. 5 was absent and - L+ was replaced by L, the equation would be analogous to Eq. (59) derived by 10.1088/0253-6102/49/5/01
-
We noticed that, if the last two terms of Eq. 5 was absent and - L+ was replaced by L, the equation would be analogous to Eq. (59) derived by P. Ao [Commun. Theor. Phys. 49, 1073 (2008)]. But his result has the same flaw as HS's. 10.1088/0253-6102/49/5/01
-
(2008)
Commun. Theor. Phys.
, vol.49
, pp. 1073
-
-
Ao, P.1
-
28
-
-
67650173778
-
-
It may be intriguing to investigate whether the solution of Eq. 5 with Eq. 18 has a stochastic representation on the original stochastic system 2.
-
It may be intriguing to investigate whether the solution of Eq. 5 with Eq. 18 has a stochastic representation on the original stochastic system 2.
-
-
-
|