Expanding electronic transmissions in the practice of medicine and the role of electronic informed consent

Journal of Patient Safety

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 217-220

  Paterick, Timothy J ^a   Paterick, Barbara B ^a   Paterick, Timothy E ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Informed consent; Interactive electronic media; Jurisprudence; Mandatory full disclosure; Medical ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650111995     PISSN: 15498417     EISSN: 15498425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31818f35c2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Tashman v. Gibbs, 556 S.E. 2d 772, 777 (VA 2002).
2. Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F. 2d 772, 784 (DC Cir 1972).
3. King JS, Moulton BW. Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making. Am J Law Med. 2006;32:429-501.
4. Martin v. Richards, 192 Wis. 2d 156, 531 NW 2d 70 (Wi 1995).
5. Schultz MM. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest. Yale Law J. 1985;95:219-299.
6. Harrington MM. The ever-expanding health care conscience clause: the quest for immunity in the struggle between professional duties and moral beliefs. 34 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 2007;779.
7. Boetzkes E, Wauchow WJ. Readings in health care ethics. Peterborough, Ont: Broadview Press; 2000. Reprinted with corrections. 2002;39-117.
8. Johnson v. Kokemoor, 545 N.W.2d495, 199 Wis. 2d 615 (Wi 1996).
9. Arato v. Avedon, 858 P.2d 598 (Cal 1993).
10. Truman v. Thomas, 611 P.2d 902 (Cal 1980).
11. Yuval R, Halon DA, Merdler A, et al. Patient comprehension and reaction to participating in a double-blind randomized clinical trial (ISIS-4) in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160: 1142-1146.
12. Schats R, Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, et al. Informed consent in trials for neurological emergencies: the example of subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:988-991.
13. Lloyd AJ, Hayes PD, London NJ, et al. Patients' ability to recall risk associated with treatment options. Lancet. 1999;353:645. Erratum in: Lancet. 1999;353:2164.
14. Shi L, Singh DA. Delivering health care in America: a systems approach. Gaithersburg, Md: Aspen Publishers; 2001:316.
15. Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 793 P.2d479(Cal 1990).
16. Alfonsi P. Informed consent: what did the doctor say? Lancet. 1999; 354:518.
17. -42 U.S.C. & 1320d-2(a) (2000).
18. Health Insurance Reform: Standards for Electronic Transactions; Announcement of Designated Standard Maintenance Organizations; Final Rule and Notice, 65 C.F.R. 50312 (2000).
19. La. Rev. Stat. Ann. & 3701.75(A) (West 2000).
20. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. & 3701.75(a)(2) (2002).
21. Electronic Records and Signatures in Commerce. Pub. L. No. 106-229, 114 Stat. 464 (June 30, 2000).
22. Miller FH. Health care information technology and informed consent: computers and the doctor-patient relationship. Indiana Law Rev. 1998;31:1019.
23. YourSurgery.com [homepage on the Internet] [cited 2007 Sept]. Available at: http://yoursurgery.com/index.cfm. Accessibility verified September 2007.
24. Andreae M. Confidentiality in medical telecommunication. Lancet. 1996;347:487-188. Erratum in: Lancet. 1996;347:628.
25. Andersen DC. The computerization of health care: can patient privacy survive? J Health Hosp Law. 1993;26:1.
26. Spielberg AR. Online without a net: physician-patient communication by electronic mail. Am J Law Med. 1999;25:267-295.
27. Boulding ME. Self-regulation: who needs it? Health Aff (Millwood). 2000;19:132-139.