Whose science and whose religion? Reflections on the relations between scientific and religious worldviews

Science and Education

Volumn 18, Issue 6-7, 2009, Pages 797-812

  Glennan, Stuart ^a  

^a BUTLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Faith; Nature of science; Religion; Science education; Theism; Worldviews

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650091265     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-007-9097-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ayer AJ (1952) Language, truth and logic. Dover, New York
2. Barbour IG (1997) Religion and science: historical and contemporary issues, revised edition. Harper Collins, New York
3. Clifford WK (2001.) The ethics of belief. In: Burger AJ (ed) The ethics of belief. Dry Bones Press, Roseville, CA
4. Dawkins R (2006) The God delusion. Houghton Mifflin, New York
5. Dennett D (2006) Breaking the spell: religion as natural, phenomenon. Viking, New York
6. Freud S (1967) Moses and monotheism. Vintage Books, New York
7. Freud S (1965) New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. Norton, New York
8. Gauch H (2007) Science, worldviews and education. Sci & Edu (this issue) doi: 10.1007/sl J 191-006-9059-1.
9. Gopnik A, Meltzoff AN, Kuhl PK (1999) The scientist in the crib: minds, brains, and how children learn. William. Morrow & Co., New York
10. Gould SJ (1997) Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History 106(2):.16-25
11. Hume D (1777) Enquiries concerning human understanding and concerning the principles of morals, thirdedition with text revised and notes by P.H. Nidditch, Clarendon Press, Oxford Jackson F (1982) Ephiphenomenal qualia. Philosophical Quarterly 32:127-136
12. John Paul. II (pope): 1996, 1996-last update, Message to the pontifical, academy of sciences: on evolution: magisterium is concerned with question of evolution for it involves conception of man. Message delivered to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 22 October 1.996 [Homepage of Eternal Word Television Network], [Online]. Available: http://www.ewtn.com/lihrary/PAPAL.DOC/JP961.022. HTM. [Access Date: 2007, 2/21]
13. Kitcher P (2006) Four ways of "biologicizing" ethics. In: Sober E (ed) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 575-586
14. Lacy H (1996) On relations between science and religion. Science & Education 5(2):] 25-141
15. Mahner M, Bunge M (1996) Is religious education compatible with science education? Science & Education 5(2): 101-123
16. Mahner M, Bunge M (1996) The incompatibility of science and religion sustained: a reply to our critics. Science & Education 5(2): 189-199
17. McCauley R (2000) The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalness of science. In: Keil F, Wilson R (eds) Explanation and cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 61-85
18. Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83:435-450
19. Pius XII (pope) (1999) 1999-last update, Humani Generas: (Concerning some false opinions threatening to undermine the foundations of Catholic doctrine). Encyclical promulgated on 12 August .1950 [Homepage of Eternal. Word Television Network], [Online]. Available: http://www.ewtn.com/library/ ENCYC/P12HUMAN.HTM [Access Date: 2007, 2/19]
20. Polkinghorne J (1986) One world: the interaction of science and theology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
21. Ruse ME, Wilson EO (1986) Moral philosophy as applied science. Philosophy: The Journal, of the Royal Institute of Philosophy 61:173-192
22. Settle T (1996) Applying scientific open mindedness to religion and science education. Science & Education 5(2): 125-141.
23. Tillich P (1957) Dynamics of faith. Perennial Classics, New York
24. Wilson EO (1998) Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Vintage Books, New York