On ion and molecular polarization of halides in water

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1449-1453

  Guàrdia, Elvira ^a   Skarmoutsos, Ioannis ^a   Masia, Marco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650090434     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct900096n     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. J. Chem. Theory Comput. has recently devoted a special issue (2007, vol. 3 p 1877) on polarization highlighting that new and sophisticated polarizable force fields are required to provide more quantitative and converged results.
2. Mallik, B. S.; Semparithi, A.; Chandra, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 194512.
3. Laage, D.; Hynes, J. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U. S. A. 2007, 104, 11167.
4. Smith, J. D.; Saykally, R. J.; Geissler, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13847.
5. Omta, A. W.; Kropman, M. F.; Woutersen, S.; Bakker, H. J. Science 2003, 301, 347.
6. Mancinelli, R.; Botti, A.; Bruni, F.; Ricci, M. A.; Soper, A. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 13570.
7. Lo Nostro, P.; Ninham, B. W.; Milani, S.; Lo Nostro, A.; Pesavento, G.; Baglioni, P. Rionhys. Chem. 2006, 124, 208.
8. Jungwirth, P.; Tobias, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1259.
9. Kuo, I-F. W.; Mundy, C. J. Science 2004, 303, 658.
10. Cacace, M. G.; Landau, E. M.; Ramsden, J. J. Rev. Biophys. 1997, 30, 241.
11. Coudert, F.-X.; Vuilleumier, R.; Boutin, A. ChemPhysChem 2006, 7, 2464.
12. Craig, V. S. J.; Ninham, B. W.; Pashley, R. M. Nature 1993, 364, 317.
13. Lugli, F.; Zerbetto, F. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 47.
14. Masia, M.; Probst, M.; Rey, R. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123,164505.
15. Masia, M.; Probst, M.; Rey, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 420,267.
16. Masia, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 184107.
17. Kaminski, G. A.; Stern, H. A.; Berne, B. J.; Friesner, R. A. J.Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 621.
18. Giese, T. J.; York, D. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 164108.
19. Piquemal, J.-P.; Chelli, R.; Procacci, P.; Gresh, N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 8170.
20. Söderhjelm, P.; Öhrn, A.; Ryde, U.; Karlström, G. J. Chem. Phys.2008, 128, 014102.
21. It is still debated if DFT methods should be considered ab initio, considering that the development of functionals requires the use of parameters. Since the number of parameters is low (compared to other semiempirical methods), and since the quality of results is comparable to wavefunction based methods, we prefer to classify DFT as an ab initio technique.
22. Raugei, S.; Klein, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 196.
23. Heuft, J. M.; Meijer, E. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 119, 11788.
24. Heuft, J. M.; Meijer, E. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 094501.
25. Heuft, J. M.; Meijer, E. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 094506.
26. Öhrn, A.; Karlström, G. J. Phys. Chem. R 2004, 108, 8452.
27. Petit, L.; Vuilleumier, R.; Maldivi, P.; Adamo, C. J. Chem. Theory Comnut. 2008, 4, 1040.
28. Tuñon, I.; Martins-Costa, M. T. C.; Millot, C.; Ruiz-López, M. F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 241, 450.
29. Krekeler, C.; Hess, B.; Delle Site, L. J. Chem. Phys. 2006,125,054305.
30. Car, R.; Parrinello, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 2471.
31. CPMD version 3.11, Copyright IBM Corp. 1990-2006, MPI für Festköorperforschung Stuttgart 1997-2001. For downloads see http://www.cpmd.org (accessed Apr 1, 2009).
32. von Lilienfeld, O. A.; Tavernelli, I.; Rothlisberger, U.; Sebastiani, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 153004.
33. Lin, I.-C.; Seitsonen, A. P.; Coutinho-Neto, M. D.; Tavernelli, I.; Rothlisberger, U. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 13, 1127.
34. Dr. I.-Chun Lin, private communication.
35. Troullier, N.; Martins, J. L. Phys. Rev.B 1991, 43, 1993.
36. Goedecker, S.; Teter, M.; Hutter, J. Phys. Rev.B 1996, 54, 1703.
37. Hartwigsen, C.; Goedecker, S.; Hutter, J. Phys. Rev.B 1998, 58, 3641.
38. Krack, M. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2005, 114, 145.
39. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev.A1988, 38, 3098.
40. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev.B1988, 37, 785.
41. Marzari, N.; Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev.B 1997, 56, 12847.
42. Silvestrelli, P. L.; Parrinello, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 3308. erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 5415.
43. r; for the most recent estimates of their value, check ref 50.
44. Frenkel, D.; Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulations: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, USA, 2002.
45. This value is also in good agreement with recent accurate experimental results (see ref 46) according to which uμ = 2.9 ± 0.6 D. Though, on the one hand it should be noted that a direct measurement of the dipole moment of liquid water does not exist, the best estimate being based on the analysis of the X-ray structure; on the other hand, the method employed here allows to compute the static dipole moment neglecting the dynamical contributions. For a thorough explanation of this issue we refer to ref 47.
46. Badyal, Y. S.; Saboungi, M.-L.; Price, D. L.; Shastri, S. D.; Haeffner, D. R.; Soper, A. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 9206.
47. Pasquarello, A.; Resta, R. Phys. Rev.B 2003, 68, 174302.
48. Bucher, D.; Kuyucak, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 10786.
49. Wick, C. D.; Xantheas, S. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 41414146.
50. Hättig, C.; Hess, B. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 3863.
51. Coher, J. J. Phys. Chem, 1976, 80, 2078.
52. Salanne, M.; Vuilleumier, R.; Madden, P. A.; Simon, C.; Turq, P.; Guillot, B. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 494207.