Benefits and challenges of evaluating ubiquitous technology in field settings

Proceedings - The 2nd International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, UBICOMM 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 30-37

  Isomursu, Minna ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKERS; IN-FIELD; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY; UBIQUITOUS TECHNOLOGY;

TECHNOLOGY;

UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

EID: 67650046645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/UBICOMM.2008.40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Heisenberg,W. Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, Zeitschrift für Physik, 43 (1927)
2. Morwitz, V., Johnson, E., Schmittlein, D. Does measuring intent change behavior. Journal of consumer research, 20, 1 (1993), 453-469.
3. Häikiö, J., Isomursu, M., Matinmikko, T., Wallin, A., Ailisto, H., Huomo, T. "Touch-based user interface for elderly users". Proceedings of MobileHCI, Singapore, September 9-12, 2007.
4. Dutton, D., Aron A. Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of personality and social psychology, 30 (1974).
5. Isomursu, M., Tähti, M., Väinämö, S. and Kuutti, K. "Experimental Evaluation of Five Methods for Collecting Emotions in Field Settings with Mobile Applications" Int. Journal of Human Computer Studies. Elsevier. Volume 65 (Issue 4), 2007, pp. 404 - 418 .
6. Knox, R., Inkster, J. Postdecision dissonance at post time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, (1968).
7. Frenkel, O., Doob, A. Post-decision dissonance at the polling booth. Canadian journal of behavioural science, 8, (1976).
8. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford university press, Stanford, CA, USA, 1957.
9. Wilson, T., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J., Gilbert, D., Axsom, D. Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of personality and social psychology, 28 (2000)
10. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., Stone, A. 2004. A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, Vol. 306. no. 5702, pp. 1776 - 1780
11. Berdichevsky. D., Neunschwander, E. Towards an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 42, No 5. (1999)
12. Schultz, R., Hanusa, B. Long-term effects of control and predictability-enhancing interventions: Findings and ethical issues. Journal of personality and social psychology, 36 (1978).
13. Schooler, J. Engstler-Schooler, T. Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive psychology, 22, (1990)
14. Pirlich, M., Lochs, H. Nutrition in the elderly. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. Vol 15 No 6, pp 869-884, (2001).
15. Ailisto, H., Pohjanheimo, L., Välkkynen, P., Strömmer, E., Tuomisto, T., Korhonen, I. Bridging the physical and virtual worlds by local connectivity-based physical selection. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10, (2006), 333-344.
16. Forlizzi, J., Ford, S., 2000. The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers. In: Proceedings of the DIS 2000 Seminar, Communications of the ACM, New York, pp. 419-423.
17. Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Smith, I., Chen, M., Everitt, K., Froehlich, J., Landay, J. Conducting In Situ Evaluations for and With Ubiquitous Computing Technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 22(1&2), 103-118.
18. Schiano, D., Ehrlich, S., Sheridan, K., 2004. Categorical imperative NOT: facial affect is perceived continuously. In: Proceedings of CHI04, ACM Press, pp. 49-56.
19. Larson, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M., 1983. The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 41-56.
20. Intille, S., Rongoni, J., Kukla, C., Iacono, I., Bao. L., 2003 Context-aware experience sampling tool. Proceedings of CHI. ACM.
21. Froehlich, J., Chen, M., Consolvo, M., Harrison, B., Landay, J. MyExperience: A System for In situ Tracing and Capturing of User Feedback on Mobile Phones. Proceedings of MobiSys, ACM. pp.57-70.
22. Aronson, E. 2004. The Social Animal. Worth Publishers. Ninth edition.
23. Mandryk R., Inkpen, K., Calvert, T. (2006) Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 141-158.
24. Kjeldskov, J., Graham, C., Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Howards, S., Balbo, S., Davies, J. 2005. Evaluating the usability of a mobile guide: in influence of location, participants and resources. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 24, No1, pp 51 - 65.
25. Lane, H., Bahan, B. 1998. Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children: a review and reply from a Deaf-World perspective. 1: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. ;119 (4), pp. 297-313.
26. Isomursu, M. "Evaluating user experience in technology pilots". Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction Symposium, IFIP, Milan, September, 2008.
27. T.C. Liu, H.Y. Wang, J.K. Liang, T.W. Chan, H.W. Ko, J.C. Yang Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (3) , 2003. pp. 371-382
28. S. Lee, A. Cheok, T. James, G. Debra, C. Jie, W. Chuang, F. Farbiz, A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human-poultry interaction through the internet Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 301-317. Aug. 2006.