In-row and between-row interference by corn modifies annual weed control by preemergence residual herbicide

Weed Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 497-504

  Donald, William W ^a   Johnson, William G ^a,c   Nelson, Kelly A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b Division of Plant Sciences   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMARANTHUS TUBERCULATUS; SETARIA FABERI; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 67650021661     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-040R3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anonymous. 2002. Missouri Crop and Weather Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 37 p.
2. Bedmar, F., P. Manetti, and G. Monterubbianesi. 1999. Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. Brasilia 34:187-193. (Pubitemid 129635650)
3. Donald, W. W. and W. G. Johnson. 2003. Interference effects of weed-infested bands in or between crop rows on field corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 17:755-763.
4. Donald, W. W., N. R. Kitchen, and K. A. Sudduth. 2001. Between-row mowing + banded herbicide to control annual weeds and reduce herbicide use in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:576-584.
5. Fiebig, W. W., D. G. Shilling, and D. A. Knauft. 1991. Peanut genotype response to interference from common cocklebur. Crop Sci. 31:1289-1292.
6. Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 20-30, 241-247, 316-356.
7. Hall, M. R., C. J. Swanton, and G. W. Anderson. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441-447.
8. Helsel, D. R. and R. M. Hirsch. 1992. Statistical Methods in Water Resources. New York: Elsevier. Pp. 157-208, Appendix A.
9. Henry, W. T. and T. T. Bauman. 1989. Interference between soybeans (Glycine max) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) under Indiana field conditions. Weed Sci. 37:753-760.
10. Hoshmand, A. R. 1994. Experimental Research Design and Analysis. A Practical Approach for Agricultural and Natural Sciences. Boca Raton, FL:CRC. Pp. 297-345.
11. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42:568-573.
12. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weiss, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35:207-214. (Pubitemid 26453756)
13. Missouri Agricultural Statistics Service. 2001. 2001 Missouri Farm Facts. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Agriculture/Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. P. 39.
14. Myers, R. H. and D. C. Montgomery. 2002. Response Surface Methodology. Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. 798 p.
15. Ngouajio, M., C. Lemieux, and G. D. Leroux. 1999a. Prediction of corn (zea mays) yield loss from early observations of the relative leaf area and the relative leaf cover of weeds. Weed Sci. 47:297-304. (Pubitemid 29432454)
16. Ngouajio, M., G. D. Leroux, and C. Lemieux. 1999b. Influence of images recording height and crop growth stage on leaf cover estimates and their performance in yield prediction models. Crop Prot. 18:501-508. (Pubitemid 29492372)
17. Ngouajio, M., G. D. Leroux, and C. Lemieux. 1999c. A flexible sigmoidal model relating crop yield to weed relative leaf cover and its comparison with nested models. Weed Res. 39:329-343. (Pubitemid 29442443)
18. Pike, D. R., E. W. Stoller, and L. M. Wax. 1990. Modeling soybean growth and canopy apportionment in weed-soybean (Glycine max) competition. Weed Sci. 38:522-527.
19. Rajcan, I. and C. J. Swanton. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Res. 71:139-150. (Pubitemid 32632020)
20. Rikoon, J. S., D. H. Constance, and S. Galetta. 1996. Factors affecting farmer's use and rejection of banded pesticide applications. J. Soil Water Conserv. 51:322-329. (Pubitemid 27041109)
21. Ruiz, J. A., J. J. Sanchez, and M. M. Goodman. 1998. Base temperature and heat unit requirement of 49 Mexican maize races. Maydica 43:277-282. (Pubitemid 29092187)
22. Schroder, D., J. C. Hatley, and R. M. Finley. 1984. The contribution of herbicides and other technologies to corn production in the corn belt region, 1964 to 1979. N. Cent. J. Agric. Econ. 6:95-104.
23. Stoller, E. W., S. K. Harrison, L. M. Wax, E. E. Regnier, and E. D. Nafziger. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3:155-182.
24. Taylor, K. L. and R. G. Hartzler. 2000. Effect of seed bank augmentation on herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol. 14:261-267. (Pubitemid 33145634)
25. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-Crop Competition, a Review. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. Pp. 46- 49, 84-85.