A multi-agent architecture for environmental impact assessment: Information fusion, data mining and decision making

ICEIS 2007 - 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Proceedings

Volumn AIDSS, Issue , 2007, Pages 219-224

  Sokolova, Marina V ^a,b   Fernández Caballero, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b SOUTHWEST STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Conceptual hierarchy; Data fusion; Data handling; Decision support system; Environmental impact; Multi agent system

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL HIERARCHY; DECISION SUPPORTS; EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT; HETEROGENEOUS DATA; HUMAN HEALTH; INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES; MULTIAGENT ARCHITECTURE; PATTERN DISCOVERY; REAL-TIME DECISION MAKING; STATE GOVERNMENTS; THREE-LAYER;

DATA FUSION; DATA HANDLING; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; INFORMATION FUSION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MINING; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SUN; WATER POLLUTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

EID: 67649982739     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Agent UML: http://www.auml.org/
2. Athanasiadis, I.N., Mitkas, P.A. (2004). An agent-based intelligent environmental monitoring system. In: Management of Environmental Quality, 15, 238-249.
3. Artemenko, M., Hudec, O., Lapina, T. and Sokolova, M.V, (2004). The information-analytical program tool for regional decision making in social sphere. In: Telecommunications, 9, 42-44.
4. Bradshaw, J.M. (1997). Software Agents. The MIT Press.
5. Carrillo González, R., and González-Chávez, M.C.A. (2006). Metal accumulation in wild plants surrounding mining wastes. Environmental Pollution, 144, 84-92.
6. Chang, C.L. (2006). A study of applying data mining to early intervention for developmentally-delayed children. Expert Systems with Applications. In press.
7. Chen, H., Bell, M. (2002). Instrumented city database analysts using multi-agents. Transportation Research, PartC, 10,419-432.
8. DeLoach, S.A., Wood, M.F., and Sparkman, C.H. (2001). Multiagent systems engineering. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 11,231-258
9. Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J., and Perini, A. (2002). The Tropos software development methodology: Processes, models and diagrams. In: Third International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, Juna.
10. Gómez-Sanz, J., and Pavon, J. (2003). Agent oriented software engineering with INGENIAS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2691 394-403.
11. Gorodetsky, V., Karsaeyv, O., Samoilov, V. (2005). Multi-agent and data mining technologies for situation assessment in security-related applications. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Jankovski, A., Skowron, A., and Szczuka, M. (eds.), Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multi-agent Systems, 411-422.
12. International Classification of Diseases (ICD): http://www.who.int/ classifications/icd/en/
13. López-Jaquero, V., Montero, F., González, P., and Fernández-Caballero, A. (2005). A multi-agent system architecture for the adaptation of user interfaces. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3690, 583-586.
14. Padgham, L. and Winikoff, M. (2002). Prometheus: A pragmatic methodology for engineering intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the OOPSLA 2002 Workshop on Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Seattle.
15. Protégé: http://protege.stanford.edu/
16. Sokolova, M.V., Rashad J. Rasras, and Skopin, D. (2006). The artificial neural network based approach for mortality structure analysis. In: American Journal of Applied Science, 3, 1698-1702.
17. Tumnen, M., and Latola, K. (2005). UV-B radiation and acclimation in timberline plants. Environmental Pollution, 137, 390-403.
18. Wooldridge, M. (2002). An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D. (2000). The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3, 285-312.