Survival benefits in mimicry: A quantitative framework

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 259, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 462-468

  Mikaberidze, Alexey ^a   Haque, Masudul ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

Author keywords

Batesian; Muellerian; Mutualism; Parasitism; Predator behavior

Indexed keywords

MIMICRY; MUTUALISM; PARASITISM; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; PREDATOR; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; SYMBIOSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MEMORY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 67649976637     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barber J.R., and Conner W.E. Acoustic mimicry in a predator-prey interaction. PNAS 104 (2007) 9331-9334
2. Cross M.C., and Hohenberg P.C. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Reviews of Modern Physics 65 (1993) 851-1112
3. Darst C.R. Predator learning, experimental psychology and novel predictions for mimicry dynamics. Animal Behaviour 71 (2006) 743-748
4. Edmunds M. Why are there good and poor mimics?. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 70 (2000) 459-466
5. Ellner S., Sasaki A., Haraguchi Y., and Matsuda H. Speed of invasion in lattice population models: pair-edge approximation. Journal of Mathematical Biology 36 (1998) 469-484
6. Gavrilets S., and Hastings A. Coevolutionary chase in two-species systems with applications to mimicry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 191 (1998) 415-427
7. Huheey J.E. Mathematical models of mimicry. American Naturalist 31 (1988) s22-s41
8. Ihalainen E., Lindström L., and Mappes J. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20 (2007) 780-791
9. Ihalainen E., Lindström I.L., Mappes J., and Puolakkainen S. Butterfly effects in mimicry? Combining signal and taste can twist the relationship of Müllerian co-mimics. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62 (2008) 1267-1276
10. Johnstone R. The evolution of inaccurate mimics. Nature 418 (2002) 524-526
11. Joron M., and Iwasac Y. The evolution of a Müllerian mimic in a spatially distributed community. Journal of Theoretical Biology 237 (2005) 87-103
12. Joron M., and Mallet J.L.B. Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13 (1998) 461-466
13. Kawaguchi I., and Sasaki A. The wave speed of intergradation zone in two-species lattice Müllerian mimicry model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 243 (2006) 594-603
14. Lynn S.K. Learning to avoid aposematic prey. Animal Behaviour 70 (2005) 1221-1226
15. MacDougall A., and Dawkins M.S. Predator discrimination error and the benefits of Müllerian mimicry. Animal Behaviour 55 (1998) 1281-1288
16. Mallet J. Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in Müllerian mimicry. Evolutionary Ecology 13 (1999) 777-806
17. Mallet J. Mimicry: an interface between psychology and evolution. PNAS 98 (2001) 8928-8930
18. Mallet J.L., and Joron M. Evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30 (1999) 201-233
19. Owen R.E., and Owen A.R.G. Mathematical paradigms for mimicry-recurrent sampling. Journal of Theoretical Biology 109 (1984) 217-247
20. Rowland H.M., Ihalainen E., Lindström L., Mappes J., and Speed M.P. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences. Nature 448 (2007) 64-66
21. Sasaki A., Kawaguchi I., and Yoshimori A. Spatial mosaic and interfacial dynamics in a Müllerian mimicry system. Theoretical Population Biology 61 (2002) 49-71
22. Servedio M.R. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration. Evolution 54 (2000) 751-763
23. Sherratt T.N. The evolution of imperfect mimicry. Behavioral Ecology 13 (2002) 821-826
24. Sherratt T.N. Spatial mosaic formation through frequency-dependent selection in Müllerian mimicry complexes. Journal of Theoretical Biology 240 (2006) 165-174
25. Sherratt T.N. The evolution of Müllerian mimicry. Naturwissenschaften 95 (2008) 681-695
26. Skelhorn J., and Rowe C. Prey palatability influences predator learning and memory. Animal Behaviour 71 (2006) 1111-1118
27. Speed M.P. Muellerian mimicry and the psychology of predation. Animal Behaviour 45 (1993) 571-580
28. Speed M.P. Robot predators in virtual ecologies: the importance of memory in mimicry studies. Animal Behaviour 57 (1999) 203-213
29. Speed M.P. Batesian, quasi-Batesian or Müllerian mimicry? Theory and data in mimicry research. Evolutionary Ecology 13 (1999) 755-776
30. Speed M.P., Alderson N.J., Hardman C., and Ruxton G.D. Testing Müllerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267 (2000) 725-731
31. Speed M.P., and Turner J.R.G. Learning and memory in mimicry: II. Do we understand the mimicry spectrum?. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 67 (1999) 281-312
32. Turner J.R.G., Kearney E.P., and Exton L.S. Mimicry and the Monte Carlo predator: the palatability spectrum and the origins of mimicry. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23 (1984) 247-268
33. Turner J.R.G., and Speed M.P. Learning and memory in mimicry. I. Simulations of laboratory experiments. Philosophical Transactions-Biological Sciences 351 (1996) 1157-1170
34. Turner J.R.G., and Speed M.P. How weird can mimicry get?. Evolutionary Ecology 13 (1999) 807-827
35. Vandermeer J.H., and Goldberg D.E. Population Ecology: First Principles (2003), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ