SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 28-29

Nurses and informed consent, part 2

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; NURSE ATTITUDE; UNITED STATES;

CONSENT FORMS; DOCUMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; KENTUCKY; NURSE'S ROLE; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67649966774 PISSN: 07304625 EISSN: 15388646 Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00003465-200103000-00007 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (2)

References (4)

1
- 77950381528
- Ky. LEXIS, December 18
- Kovacs v. Freeman. 197 Ky. LEXIS 158 (December 18, 1997).
- (1997) Kovacs v. Freeman , vol.197 , pp. 158

2
- 77950382905
- No. 1-97-2422 (Ill. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Sept. 30)
- James v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital. No. 1-97-2422 (Ill. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Sept. 30, 1998).
- (1998) James v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital

3
- 77950386541
- S.2d, (La. App.)
- Hezequ v. Pendleton Methodist Memorial Hospital. 715 S.2d 756 (La. App. 1998).
- (1998) Hezequ v. Pendleton Methodist Memorial Hospital , vol.715 , pp. 756

4
- 77950448211
- Informed consent when patients seem confused
- Johnson L. Informed consent when patients seem confused. Medical Economics 1999;76 (7):170.
- (1999) Medical Economics , vol.76 , Issue.7 , pp. 170
- Johnson, L.¹

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.