Multiple captures of adult prairie voles are correlated with residency status and genetic parentage

Journal of Mammalogy

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 696-703

  Ganev, Iordan V ^a   Solomon, Nancy G ^a   Lucia, Kristen E ^a   Keane, Brian ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Livetrapping; Microsatellite loci; Microtus ochrogaster; Monogamy; Parentage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CAPTURE METHOD; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HABITAT USE; MONOGAMY; PAIR BOND; PARENTAGE; RODENT; TRAPPING;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; MICROTUS OCHROGASTER; MURIDAE;

EID: 67649963345     PISSN: 00222372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-198R1.1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BERTEAUX, D., F. MASSEBOEUF, J. BONZOM, J. BERGERON, D. W. THOMAS, AND H. LAPIERRE. 1996. Effect of carrying a radiocollar on expenditure of energy by meadow voles. Journal of Mammalogy 77:359-363.
2. BLAUSTEIN, A. R., AND S. I. ROTHSTEIN. 1978. Multiple captures of Reithrodontomys megatons: social bonding in a mouse? American Midland Naturalist 100:376-383.
3. BURT, W. H. 1940. Territorial behavior and populations of some small mammals in southern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 45:1-58.
4. CARTER, C. S., A. C. DEVRIES, AND L. L. GETZ. 1995. Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: the prairie vole model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 19:303-314.
5. CARTER, C. S., AND L. L. GETZ. 1993. Monogamy and the prairie vole. Scientific American 268:100-106.
6. CARTER, C. S., J. R. WILLIAMS, AND D. M. WITT. 1990. The biology of social bonding in a monogamous mammal. Pp. 154-164 in Hormones, brain and behavior (J. Balthazart, ed.). Karger, Basel, Switzerland.
7. CHRISTOPHER, C. C, AND G. W. BARRETT. 2007. Double captures of Peromyscus leucopus (white-footed mouse) and Ochrotomys nuttalli (golden mouse). Southeastern Naturalist 6:407-412.
8. COCHRAN, G. R., AND N. G. SOLOMON. 2000. Effects of food supplementation on the social organization of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Journal of Mammalogy 81:746-757.
9. DESY, E. A., AND G. O. BATZLI. 1989. Effects of food availability and predation on prairie vole demography: a field experiment. Ecology 70:411-421.
10. DESY, E. A., G. O. BATZLI, AND J. Liu. 1990. Effects of food and predation on behavior of prairie voles: a field experiment. Oikos 58:159-168.
11. DRICKAMER, L. C, D. M. WAGNER, AND A. S. ROBINSON. 2003. Double captures of house mice (Mus musculus) with information on genetic relatedness. American Midland Naturalist 150:308-320.
12. GANNON, W. L., R. S. SIKES, AND THE ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MAMMALOGISTS. 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88:809-823.
13. GETZ, L. L. 1972. Social structure and aggressive behavior in a population of Microtus pennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy 53:310-317.
14. GETZ, L. L., C S. CARTER, AND L. GAVISH. 1981. The mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster: field and laboratory evidence for pair-bonding. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 8:189-194.
15. GETZ, L. L., F. R. COLE, AND L. VERNER. 1986. Effectiveness of multiple-capture live traps for field behavioral studies of microtine rodents. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24:72-74.
16. GETZ, L. L., J. E. HOFMANN, B. MCGUIRE, AND T. W. DOLAN III. 2001. Twenty-five years of population fluctuations of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus in three habitats in east-central Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy 82:22-34.
17. GETZ, L. L., B. MCGUIRE, AND C S. CARTER. 2003. Social behavior, reproduction and demography of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 15:105-118.
18. GETZ, L. L., B. MCGUIRE, J. HOFMANN, T. PIZZUTO, AND B. FRASE. 1993. Social organization of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy 74:44-58.
19. GETZ, L. L., L. VERNER, F. R. COLE, J. E. HOFMANN, AND D. E. AVALOS. 1979. Comparisons of population demography of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus. Acta Theriologica 24:319- 349.
20. INSEL, T. R. 1997. A neurobiological basis of social attachment. American Journal of Psychiatry 154:726-735.
21. KALINOWSKI, S. T., M. L. TAPER, AND T. C. MARSHALL. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16:1099-1106.
22. KEANE, B., ET AL. 2007. Effect of body condition at weaning on survival and reproduction in prairie voles. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:718-727.
23. KING, J. A. 1955. Social behavior, social organization, and population dynamics in a black-tailed prairiedog town in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Contributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan 67:1-123.
24. LEMEN, C. A., AND P. W. FREEMAN. 1985. Tracking mammals with florescent pigments: a new technique. Journal of Mammalogy 66:134-136.
25. LEPRI, J. J., M. THEODORIDES, AND C. J. WYSOCKI. 1988. Ultrasonic vocalizations by adult prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Experientia 44:271-273.
26. MARSHALL, T. C, J. SLATE, L. E. B. KRUUK, AND J. M. PEMBERTON. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7:639-655.
27. MCGUIRE, B., AND L. GETZ. 1998. The nature and frequency of social interactions among free-living prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:271-279.
28. MCGUIRE, B., T. PIZZUTO, AND L. L. GETZ. 1990a. Potential for social interaction in a natural population of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:391-398.
29. MCGUIRE, B., T. PIZZUTO, AND L. L. GETZ. 1990b. Patterns of visitation in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) reveal a role for males in population regulation. Pp. 89-100 in Social systems and population cycles in voles (R. H. Tamarin, R. S. Ostfeld, S. R. Pugh, and G. Bujalska, eds.). Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
30. NEWMAN, K. S., AND Z. T. HALPIN. 1988. Individual odors and mate recognition in the prairie vole Microtus ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour 36:1779-1787.
31. SLADE, N. A. 1976. Analysis of social structure from multiple capture data. Journal of Mammalogy 57:790-795.
32. SOLOMON, N. G. 1991. Age of pairing affects reproduction in prairie voles. Laboratory Animals 25:232-235.
33. SOLOMON, N. G., AND J. J. JACQUOT. 2002. Characteristics of resident and wandering prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:951-955.
34. SPENCER, S. R., G. N. CAMERON, AND W. B. KINCAID. 1982. Multiple captures of the fulvous harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys fulves- cens). American Midland Naturalist 107:384-385.
35. TENAGLIA, K. M., J. L. VAN ZANT, AND M. C. WOOTEN. 2007. Genetic relatedness and spatial associations of jointly captured Alabama beach mice (Peromyscus polionotus ammohates). Journal of Mammalogy 88:580-588.
36. THOMAS, J. A., AND E. C. BIRNEY. 1979. Parental care and mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5:171-186.
37. YOUNG, L. J., AND Z. WANG. 2004. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience 7:1048-1054.