Response to comment on "methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A review"

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 379-381

  Dormann, Carsten F ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649933610     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05907.x     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Augustin, N. H. et al. 1996. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife J. Appl. Ecol. 33 : 339 347. (Pubitemid 126571646)
2. Betts, M. G. et al. 2006. The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence Ecol. Model. 191 : 197 224. (Pubitemid 41735463)
3. Betts, M. G. et al. 2008. Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird Proc. R. Soc. B 275 : 2257 2263.
4. Betts, M. G. et al. 2009. Comment on "Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review" Ecography 32 : 374 378.
5. Bourque, J. Desrochers, A. 2006. Spatial aggregation of forest songbird territories and possible implications for area sensitivity. Avian Conserv. Ecol 3 .
6. Carl, G. Kühn, I. 2007. Analyzing spatial ecological data using linear regression and wavelet analysis Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 22 : 315 324.
7. Carl, G. et al. 2008. A wavelet-based method to remove spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data Web Ecol. 8 : 22 29. (Pubitemid 351736818)
8. Diniz-Filho, J. A. Bini, L. M. 2005. Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 14 : 177 185. (Pubitemid 40355483)
9. Dormann, C. F. 2007a. Assessing the validity of autologistic regression Ecol. Model. 207 : 234 242. (Pubitemid 47362484)
10. Dormann, C. F. 2007b. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16 : 129 138. (Pubitemid 46299364)
11. Dormann, C. F. 2007c. Promising the future? Global change predictions of species distributions Basic Appl. Ecol. 8 : 387 397. (Pubitemid 47188062)
12. Dormann, C. F. et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review Ecography 30 : 609 628.
13. Griffith, D. A. Peres-Neto, P. R. 2006. Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses in exploiting relative location information Ecology 87 : 2603 2613.
14. Haining, R. 2003. Spatial data analysis - theory and practice. Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Hastie, T. et al. 2001. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer.
16. Hoeting, J. A. et al. 2000. An improved model for spatially correlated binary responses J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 5 : 102 114.
17. Hooten, M. B. et al. 2003. Predicting the spatial distribution of ground flora on large domains using a hierarchical Bayesian model Landscape Ecol. 18 : 487 502. (Pubitemid 37417818)
18. Huffer, F. W. Wu, H. L. 1998. Markov chain Monte Carlo for autologistic regression models with application to the distribution of plant species Biometrics 54 : 509 524. (Pubitemid 28262474)
19. McNyset, K. M. Blackburn, J. K. 2006. Does GARP really fail miserably? A response to Stockman et al. (2006) Divers. Distrib. 12 : 782 786. (Pubitemid 44657204)
20. van Teeffelen, A. J. A. Ovaskainen, O. 2007. Can the cause of aggregation be inferred from species distributions? Oikos 116 : 4 16. (Pubitemid 46103011)
21. Wintle, B. A. Bardos, D. C. 2006. Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data Ecol. Appl. 16 : 1945 1958. (Pubitemid 44536939)
22. Wu, H. L. Huffer, F. W. 1997. Modelling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model Environ. Ecol. Stat. 4 : 49 64. (Pubitemid 127509019)