Reliable change and practice effects: Outcomes of various indices compared

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 339-352

  Maassen, Gerard H ^a   Bossema, Ercolie ^b   Brand, Nico ^b  

^a Methodology and Statistics   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Practice effects; Regression based index; Reliable change index; Standard error of measurement of the difference; Standard error of prediction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NULL HYPOTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX; SIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMETRICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649933503     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: 1744411X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803390802169059     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barr, W. B., & McCrea, M. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of standardized neurocognitive testing immediately following sports concussion. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 693-702.
2. Bossema, E. R., Brand, N., Moll, F. L., Ackerstaff, R. G. A., & Van Doornen, L. J. P. (2005). Does carotid endarterectomy improve cognitive functioning? Journal of Vascular Surgery, 41, 775-781.
3. Brand, A. N., Jolles, J., & Gispen-De Wied, C. (1992). Recall and recognition memory deficits in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 25, 77-86.
4. Brand, N., Van der Wijk, A., & Hijman, R. (1990). Motor planning in neurological and psychiatric patients. In P. J. Drenth, J. A. Sergeant, & R. J. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 321-334). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
5. Bruggemans, E., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Huysmans, H. A. (1997). Assessment of cognitive deterioration in individual patients following cardiac surgery: Correcting for measurement error and practice effects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 543-559.
6. Chelune, G. J., Naugle, R. I., Lüders, H., Sedlak, J., & Awad, I. A. (1993). Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology, 7, 41-52.
7. Erlanger, D., Feldman, D., Kutner, K., Kaushik, T., Kroger, H., Festa, J., et al. (2003). Development and validation of a web-based neuropsychological test protocol for sports-related return-to-play
8. decision-making. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 293-316.
9. ID. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 693-700.
10. Hageman, W. J. J. M., & Arrindell, W. A. (1999). Establishing clinically significant change: Increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 1169-1193.
11. Hsu, L. M. (1989). Reliable changes in psychotherapy: Taking into account regression toward the mean. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 459-467.
12. Iverson, G. L., Lovell, M. R., & Collins, M. W. (2003). Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 460-467.
13. Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.
14. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 59, 12-19.
15. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Maassen, G. H. (2000a). Kelley's formula as a basis for the assessment of reliable change. Psychometrika, 65, 187-197.
17. Maassen, G. H. (2000b). Principles of defining reliable change indices. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 622-632.
18. Maassen, G. H. (2003). Principes voor de definitie van reliable change (2): Reliable change indices en practice effects [Principles of defining reliable change (2):
19. Reliable change indices and practice effects]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 58, 69-79.
20. Maassen, G. H. (2004). The standard error in the Jacobson and Truax Reliable Change Index (the classical approach to the assessment of reliable change). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 888-893.
21. Maassen, G. H., Bossema, E. R., & Brand, N. (2006). Reliable change assessment with practice effects in sport concussion research: A comment on Hinton-Bayre. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40, 829-833.
22. McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
23. McSweeny, A. J., Naugle, R. I., Chelune, G. J., & Lüders, H. (1993). "T Scores for change": An illustration of a regression approach to depicting change in clinical neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 300-312.
24. Speer, D. C. (1992). Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 402-408.
25. Temkin, N. R., Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Dikmen, S. S. (1999). Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: A comparison of four models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 357-369.
26. Wald, F. D. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (1990). De verkorte versie van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Profile of Moods States (POMS) [Short version of the Dutch translation of the Profile of Moods States (POMS)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 45, 86-90.
27. Zegers, F. E., & Hafkenscheid, A. J. P. M. (1994). The Ultimate Reliable Change Index: An alternative to the Hageman & Arrindell approach (Heymans Bulletin HB-94-1154-EX). Groningen, The Netherlands: Universiteit van Groningen.