Beyond sequential presentation: Misconceptions and misrepresentations of sequential lineups

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 31-34

  Lindsay, Rod C L ^a   Mansour, Jamal K ^a   Beaudry, Jennifer L ^b   Leach, Amy May ^c   Bertrand, Michelle I ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIMINAL JUSTICE; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL EVIDENCE; MEMORY; NOTE; OFFENDER; POLICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; WITNESS;

EID: 67649922218     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/135532508X382104     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687-706.
2. Devlin, P. (1976). Report to the secretary of State for the home department of the department committee on evidence of identification in criminal cases. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
3. Fisher, R. P., & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interview protocols for improving eyewitness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol I, pp. 53-80). Memory for Events. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
4. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J., & Fulford, J. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 741-745.
5. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., Nosworthy, G. J., Fulford, J. A., Hector, J., LeVan, V., & Seabrook, C. (1991b). Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 796-802.
6. Lindsay, R. C. L., Mansour, J. K., Beaudry, J. L., Leach, A., & Bertrand, M. I. (2009). Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 13-24.
7. Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2009). Public policy and sequential lineups. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 1-12.
8. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Quality-weighting of studies in meta-analytic research. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 25-28.
9. Rothstein, H. R. (2008). Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 61-81.
10. Steblay, N. (2001, March). 2001 + 6: An updated meta-analysis of eyewitness lineup performance under sequential versus simultaneous formats. Paper presented at 'Off the witness stand: Using psychology in the practice of justice', CUNY, New York, NY.
11. Steblay, N., Dysart, J. D., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentation: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459-474.
12. Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.