Test-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 3464-3472

  Chen, Fred K ^a,b   Patel, Praveen J ^a   Xing, Wen ^a   Bunce, Catey ^a   Egan, Catherine ^a   Tufail, Adnan T ^a   Coffey, Peter J ^b   Rubin, Gary S ^b,c   da Cruz, Lyndon ^a,b  

^a MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION RETINOPATHY; MALE; MICROPERIMETRY; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DYSTROPHY; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; RETINA MACULA DEGENERATION; RETINA MACULA HOLE; RETINA MACULOPATHY; RETINA VEIN OCCLUSION; SCOTOMA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUBRETINAL NEOVASCULARIZATION; TELANGIECTASIA; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ACUITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA; RETINA DISEASE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; RETINAL DISEASES; SCOTOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 67649908856     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2926     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Atchison DA, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Swann PG. Investigation of central visual fields in patients with age-related macular changes. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:179-183.
2. Tolentino MJ, Miller S, Gaudio AR, Sandberg MA. Visual field deficits in early age-related macular degeneration. Vision Res. 1994;34:409-413.
3. Sunness JS, Schuchard RA, Shen N, Rubin GS, Dagnelie G, Haselwood DM. Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1863-1874.
4. Rohrschneider K, Fendrich T, Becker M, Krastel H, Kruse FE, Volcker HE. Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser phthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233:743-749.
5. Timberlake GT, Mainster MA, Webb RH, Hughes GW, Trempe CL. Retinal localization of scotomata by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982;22:91-97.
6. Mainster MA, Timberlake GT, Webb RH, Hughes GW. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy: clinical applications. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:852-857.
7. Midena E, Radin PP, Pilotto E, Ghirlando A, Convento E, Varano M. Fixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: a microperimetry study. Semin Ophthalmol. 2004;19:55-61.
8. Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Aharrh-Gnama A, et al. Optical coherence tomography and fundus microperimetry imaging of spontaneous closure of traumatic macular hole: a case report. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:165-169.
9. Souka AA, Hillenkamp J, Gora F, Gabel VP, Framme C. Correlation between optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:1219-1223.
10. Boscarino MA, Johnson TM. Microperimetry in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42:743-745.
11. Unoki N, Nishijima K, Sakamoto A, et al. Retinal sensitivity loss and structural disturbance in areas of capillary nonperfusion of eyes with diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:755-760.
12. Chalam KV, Gupta SK, Shah GY, Agarwal S. Successful management of melanocytoma-associated choroidal neovascularization with photodynamic therapy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006;16:776-778.
13. Richter-Mueksch S, Vecsei-Marlovits PV, Sacu SG, Kiss CG, Weingessel B, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Functional macular mapping in patients with vitreomacular pathologic features before and after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(1):23-31.
14. Yodoi Y, Tsujikawa A, Kameda T, et al. Central retinal sensitivity measured with the micro perimeter 1 after photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143:984-994.
15. Rensch F, Spandau UH, Schlichtenbrede F, von Baltz S, Libondi T, Jonas JB, Vossmerbaeumer U. Intravitreal bevacizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39:182-185.
16. Bainbridge JW, Smith AJ, Barker SS, et al. Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2231-2239.
17. Chen FK, Uppal GS, Rubin GS, Webster A, Coffey PJ, da Cruz L. Evidence of retinal function using microperimetry following autologous retinal pigment epithelium-choroid graft in macular dystrophy: outcome in five cases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7):3143-3150.
18. Issa PC, Finger RP, Holz FG, Scholl HP. Eighteen-month follow-up of intravitreal bevacizumab in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:941-945.
19. Yenerel NM, Kucumen B, Gorgun E, Dinc UA. Atypical presentation of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS). Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2008;16:113-115.
20. Radtke ND, Aramant RB, Petry HM, Green PT, Pidwell DJ, Seiler MJ. Vision improvement in retinal degeneration patients by implantation of retina together with retinal pigment epithelium. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(2):172-182.
21. Grenga P, Lupo S, Domanico D, Vingolo EM. Efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in long standing diabetic macular edema: a microperimetry and optical coherence tomography study. Retina. Published online July 28, 2008.
22. Rohrschneider K, Bultmann S, Springer C. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27(5):536-548.
23. Weingessel B, Sacu S, Vecsei-Marlovits PV, Weingessel A, Richter-Mueksch S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of the microperimeter MP-1. Eye. Published online August 1, 2008.
24. Holladay JT. Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:287-290.
25. Sunness JS, Bressler NM, Tian Y, Alexander J, Applegate CA. Measuring geographic atrophy in advanced age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1761-1769.
26. Convento E, Barbaro G. Technical insights in the interpretation of automatic microperimetry. In: Midena E, ed. Perimetry and the Fundus: An Introduction to Microperimetry. Thorofare: Slack Inc.; 2007:229-237.
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1: 307-310.
28. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
29. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
30. Elliott DB, Sheridan M. The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti-cataract formulation trials. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:397-401.
31. Patel PJ, Chen FK, Rubin GS, Tufail A. Intersession repeatability of visual acuity scores in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Published online February 14, 2009.
32. Beck RW, Maguire MG, Bressler NM, Glassman AR, Lindblad AS, Ferris FL. Visual acuity as an outcome measure in clinical trials of retinal diseases. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1804-1809.
33. Massof RW. Application of stochastic measurement models to visual function rating scale questionnaires. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005;12:103-124.
34. Asman P, Heijl A, Olsson J, Rootzen H. Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992;70:679-686.
35. Asman P, Heijl A. Weighting according to location in computerassisted glaucoma visual field analysis. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992;70:671-678.
36. Sunness JS, Margalit E, Srikumaran D, et al. The long-term natural history of geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration: enlargement of atrophy and implications for interventional clinical trials. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:271-277.
37. Lewis RA, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Labermeier PK. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:878-881.
38. Katz J, Sommer A, Witt K. Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:70-75
39. Bjerre A, Grigg JR, Parry NR, Henson DB. Test-retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4035-4040.
40. Kim LS, McAnany JJ, Alexander KR, Fishman GA. Intersession repeatability of Humphrey perimetry measurements in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 4720-4724.
41. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:81-86.
42. Wild JM, Searle AE, Dengler-Harles M, O'Neill EC. Long-term follow-up of baseline learning and fatigue effects in the automated perimetry of glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991;69:210-216.
43. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:19-22.
44. Werner EB, Adelson A, Krupin T. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:764-767.
45. Guthauser U, Flammer J. Quantifying visual field damage caused by cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106:480-484.
46. Flammer J, Drance SM, Fankhauser F, Augustiny L. Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry: factors influencing short-term fluctuation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:876-879.
47. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1544-1549.
48. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:130-135.
49. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, LeBlanc RP, Lieberman MF, Mills RP, Werner EB. Technique for determining glaucomatous visual field progression by using animation graphics. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 118:485-491.
50. Glass E, Schaumberger M, Lachenmayr BJ. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1847-1854.
51. Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:426-435.
52. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43: 2654-2659.