Fifteen-year survival and osteolysis associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement: A concise follow-up of a previous report

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1419-1423

  Lachiewicz, Paul F ^a   Soileau, Elizabeth S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL TIME; SYNOVITIS; THICKNESS; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; AGE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67649882644     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01351     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:525-530
2. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754-765
3. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14
4. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
5. Griffin FM, Scuderi GR, Gillis AM, Li S, Jimenez E, Smith T. Osteolysis associated with cemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:592-598 (Pubitemid 28380821)
6. Dorey F, Amstutz HC. Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1:63-69 (Pubitemid 17188493)
7. Berry DJ. Recognizing and identifying osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:261-264
8. Wasielewski RC, Parks N, Williams I, Surprenant H, Collier JP, Engh G. Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:53-59 (Pubitemid 28007486)
9. Naudie DD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, Rorabeck CH. Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:53-64.
10. Puloski SK, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. An unrecognized source of polyethylene debris. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:390-397
11. O'Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design: five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1362-1371
12. Nadaud MC, Fehring TK, Fehring K. Underestimation of osteolysis in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:110-115 (Pubitemid 38112340)
13. Brassard MF, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Colizza W. Does modularity affect clinical success? A comparison with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:26-32. (Pubitemid 32595003)