A feasibility study of immobilized and free mixed culture bioaugmentation for treating atrazine in infiltrate

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 168, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 1373-1379

  Siripattanakul, Sumana ^a,b   Wirojanagud, Wanpen ^c   McEvoy, John M ^d   Casey, Francis X M ^d   Khan, Eakalak ^e  

^a CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b UBON RATCHATHANI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^d NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e North Dakota State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Atrazine biodegradation; Bacterial community change; Cell immobilization; Cell loading; Infiltration rate; Single strand conformation polymorphism

Indexed keywords

ATRAZINE BIODEGRADATION; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY CHANGE; CELL LOADING; INFILTRATION RATE; SINGLE STRAND CONFORMATION POLYMORPHISM;

BACTERIOLOGY; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIODEGRADATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL MEMBRANES; DECISION MAKING; DEGRADATION; HERBICIDES; LEACHING; PLANNING; POLYMORPHISM; REMOVAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SEEPAGE; SOIL MECHANICS; TESTING;

CELL IMMOBILIZATION;

ATRAZINE; POLYVINYL ALCOHOL;

ATRAZINE; BACTERIUM; IMMOBILIZATION; INFILTRATION; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT;

AGRICULTURAL WASTE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; CELL CULTURE MONITORING; CELL INFILTRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION KINETICS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMMOBILIZED CELL CULTURE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SAND; SINGLE STRAND CONFORMATION POLYMORPHISM; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL;

ATRAZINE; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 67649852978     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. van Veen J.A., van Overbeek L.S., and van Elsas J.D. Fate and activity of microorganism introduced into soil. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61 (1997) 121-135
2. Cochet N., Lebeault J.M., and Vijayalakshmi M.A. Physicochemical aspects of cell adsorption. In: Tyagi R.D., and Vembu K. (Eds). Wastewater treatment by immobilized cells (1990), CRC Press, Florida 1-28
3. Dervakos G.A., and Webb C. On the merits of viable-cell immobilization. Biotechnol. Adv. 9 (1991) 559-612
4. Chen K.C., and Lin Y.F. Immobilization of microorganisms with phosphorylated polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gel. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 16 (1994) 79-83
5. Chang I.S., Kim C.I., and Nam B.U. The influence of poly-vinyl-alcohol (PVA) characteristics on the physical stability of encapsulated immobilization media for advanced wastewater treatment. Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 3050-3054
6. Jittawattanarat R., Kostarelos K., and Khan E. Immobilized cell augmented activated sludge process for treating wastewater containing hazardous compounds. Water Environ. Res. 79 (2007) 461-471
7. Jittawattanarat R., Kostarelos K., and Khan E. Immobilized cell augmented activated sludge process for enhanced nitrogen removal from wastewater. Water Environ. Res. 79 (2007) 2325-2335
8. Zhang L.S., Wu W.Z., and Wang J.L. Immobilization of activated sludge using improved polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gel. J. Environ. Sci. 19 (2007) 1293-1297
9. Gannon E. Site Remediation: Environmental Clean-up of Fertilizer and Agri-chemical Dealer Sites, vol. 28. Iowa Case Studies (1992), Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation, Iowa
10. Koskinen W.C., and Clay S.A. Factors affecting atrazine fate in North Central U.S. soils. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 151 (1997) 117-165
11. Rousseaux S., Hartmann A., Lagacherie B., Piutti S., Andreux F., and Soulas G. Inoculation of an atrazine-degrading strain, Chelatobacter heintzii Cit1, in four different soils: effects of different inoculum densities. Chemosphere 51 (2003) 569-576
12. Siripattanakul S., Wirojanagud W., McEvoy J., and Khan E. Effect of cell-to-matrix ratio in polyvinyl alcohol immobilized pure and mixed cultures for atrazine degradation. Water Air Soil Poll.: Focus 8 (2008) 257-266
13. Siripattanakul S., Wirojanagud W., McEvoy J., Limpiyakorn T., and Khan E. Atrazine degradation by stable mixed cultures enriched from agricultural soil and their characterization. J. Appl. Microbiol. 106 (2009) 986-992
14. Gentry T.J., Rensing C., and Pepper I.L. New approach for bioaugmentation as a remediation technology. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 34 (2004) 447-494
15. D'Archivio A.A., Fanelli M., Mazzeo P., and Ruggieri F. Comparison of different sorbents for multiresidue solid-phase extraction of 16 pesticides from groundwater coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 71 (2007) 25-30
16. Lin C.W., Lai C.Y., Chen L.H., and Chiang W.F. Microbial community structure during oxygen-stimulated bioremediation in phenol-contaminated groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 140 (2007) 221-229
17. Yolcubal I., Pierce S.A., Maier R.M., and Brusseau M.L. Biodegradation during contaminant transport in porous media. V. the influence of growth and cell elution on microbial distribution. J. Environ. Qual. 31 (2002) 1824-1830
18. Godsy E.M., Goerlitz D.F., and Grbic-Galic D. Methanogenic biodegradation of creosote contaminants in natural and simulated ground-water ecosystems. Ground Water 30 (1992) 232-242