Protein-binding elements establish in the oocyte the primary imprint of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes domain

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 25, 2009, Pages 10242-10247

  Kaufman, Yotam ^a   Heled, Maya ^a   Perk, Jonathan ^a   Razin, Aharon ^a   Shemer, Ruth ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cis elements; DNA methylation; Imprinting; Protein factors

Indexed keywords

GLYCOPROTEIN E1; GLYCOPROTEIN E2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORN SOX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; METHYLATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PRADER WILLI SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING;

ANGELMAN SYNDROME; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA METHYLATION; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY SHIFT ASSAY; FEMALE; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; OOCYTES; PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME; PROTEIN BINDING;

EID: 67649852539     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902087106     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Horsthemke B, Wagstaff J (2008) Mechanisms of imprinting of the Prader-Willi/Angelman region. Am J Med Genet A 146A:2041-2052.
2. Buiting K, Lich C, Cottrell S, Barnicoat A, Horsthemke B (1999) A 5-kb imprinting center deletion in a family with Angelman syndrome reduces the shortest region of deletion overlap to 880 bp. Hum Genet 105:665-666. (Pubitemid 30026047)
3. Ohta T, et al. (1999) Imprinting mutation mechanisms in Prader-Willi Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 64:397-413. (Pubitemid 129500523)
4. Kantor B, Kaufman Y, Makedonski K, Razin A, Shemer R (2004b) Establishing the epigenetic status of the Prader-Willi/Angelman imprinting center in the gametes and embryo. Hum Mol Genet 13:2767-2779. (Pubitemid 39562541)
5. Kantor B, Makedonski K, Green-Finberg Y, Shemer R, Razin A (2004a) Control elements within the PWS/AS imprinting box and their function in the imprinting process. Hum Mol Genet 13:751-762. (Pubitemid 38455962)
6. Ambrosetti DC, Scholer HR, Dailey L, Basilico C (2000) Modulation of the activity of multiple transcriptional activation domains by the DNA binding domains mediates the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3 on the fibroblast growth factor-4 enhancer. J Biol Chem 275:23387-23397. (Pubitemid 30646242)
7. Avilion AA, et al. (2003) Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev 17:126-140. (Pubitemid 36062514)
8. Zuccotti M, et al. (2008) Maternal Oct-4 is a potential key regulator of the developmental competence of mouse oocytes. BMC Dev Biol 8:97.
9. Nichols J, et al. (1998) Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95:379-391. (Pubitemid 28507326)
10. Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG (2000) Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 24:372-376. (Pubitemid 30187435)
11. Ambrosetti DC, Basilico C, Dailey L (1997) Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites. Mol Cell Biol 17:6321-6329. (Pubitemid 27451176)
12. Williams DC Jr, Cai M, Clore GM (2004) Molecular basis for synergistic transcriptional activation by Oct1 and Sox2 revealed from the solution structure of the 42-kDa Oct1.Sox2.Hoxb1-DNA ternary transcription factor complex. J Biol Chem 279:1449-1457. (Pubitemid 38082673)
13. Ohta T, et al. (1999a) Molecular mechanism of Angelman syndrome in two large families involves an imprinting mutation. Am J Hum Genet 64:385-396. (Pubitemid 129500522)
14. El-Maarri O, et al. (2001) Maternal methylation imprints on human chromosome 15 are established during or after fertilization. Nat Genet 27:341-344. (Pubitemid 32201860)
15. Geuns E, De Rycke M, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I (2003) Methylation imprints of the imprint control region of the SNRPN-gene in human gametes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Mol Genet 12:2873-2879. (Pubitemid 37442016)
16. Perk J, et al. (2002) The imprinting mechanism of the Prader-Willi/Angelman regional control center. EMBO J 21:5807-5814. (Pubitemid 35315278)
17. Schumacher A, Buiting K, Zeschnigk M, Doerfler W, Horsthemke B (1998) Methylation analysis of the PWS/AS region does not support an enhancer-competition model of genomic imprinting on human chromosome 15. Nat Genet 19:324-325.
18. Shemer R, Birger Y, Riggs AD, Razin A (1997) Structure of the imprinted mouse Snrpn gene and establishment of its parental-specific methylation pattern. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10267-10272. (Pubitemid 27407030)
19. Li X, et al. (2008) A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev Cell 15:547-557.
20. Arnaud P, et al. (2006) Stochastic imprinting in the progeny of Dnmt3L-/- females. Hum Mol Genet 15:589-598. (Pubitemid 43210273)
21. Epsztejn-Litman S, et al. (2008) De novo DNA methylation promoted by G9a prevents reprogramming of embryonically silenced genes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:1176-1183.
22. Xin Z, et al. (2003) Role of histone methyltransferase G9a in CpG methylation of the Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting center. J Biol Chem 278:14996-15000. (Pubitemid 36799831)
23. Chotalia M, et al. (2009) Transcription is required for establishment of germline methylation marks at imprinted genes. Genes Dev 23:105-117.
24. Farber C, Dittrich B, Buiting K, Horsthemke B (1999) The chromosome 15 imprinting centre (IC) region has undergone multiple duplication events and contains an upstream exon of SNRPN that is deleted in all Angelman syndrome patients with an IC microdeletion. Hum Mol Genet 8:337-343. (Pubitemid 29054276)
25. Botquin V, et al. (1998) New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantation enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2. Genes Dev 12:2073-2090. (Pubitemid 28323880)
26. Mapendano CK, et al. (2006) Expression of the Snurf-Snrpn IC transcript in the oocyte and its putative role in the imprinting establishment of the mouse 7C imprinting domain. J Hum Genet 51:236-243.
27. Dittrich B, et al. (1996) Imprint switching on human chromosome 15 may involve alternative transcripts of the SNPRN gene. Nat Genet 14:165-170. (Pubitemid 26338796)
28. Johnstone KA, et al. (2006) A human imprinting centre demonstrates conserved acquisition but diverged maintenance of imprinting in a mouse model for Angelman syndrome imprinting defects. Hum Mol Genet 15:393-404. (Pubitemid 43159892)
29. Zogel C, et al. (2006) Identification of cis- and trans-acting factors possibly modifying the risk of epimutations on chromosome 15. Eur J Hum Genet 14:752-758. (Pubitemid 43797273)
30. Lee KAW, Binderif A, Green MR (1988) A small scale procedure for preparation of nuclear extracts that support efficient transcription and pre-mRNA splicing. Gene Anal Tech 5:22-31. (Pubitemid 18110154)
31. Engemann S, El-Maarri O, Hajkova P, Oswald J, Walter J (2001) Bisulfite-based methylation analysis of imprinted genes. Methods Mol Biol 181:217-228.