Pheromone communication in amphibians and reptiles

Annual Review of Physiology

Volumn 71, Issue , 2009, Pages 161-176

  Houck, Lynne D ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical signals; Vertebrates

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PLETHODONTID RECEPTIVITY FACTOR; PROTEIN; SEX PHEROMONE; SPLENDIPHERIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMPHIBIA; BEHAVIOR; BIOCHEMISTRY; CHEMICAL CUE; FEMORAL GLAND; LIZARD; MATE CHOICE; NEWT; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY BULB; OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; REPTILE; REVIEW; SALAMANDER; SECRETION; SENSORY SYSTEM; SMELLING; SNAKE; VOMERONASAL ORGAN;

AMPHIBIANS; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; PHEROMONES; REPTILES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 67649805474     PISSN: 00664278     EISSN: 15451585     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163134     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Keystone Symp. 2007. Chemical Senses: From Genes to Perception (A7), Jan. 21-27, Snowbird, UT. http://www.keystonesymposia.org/Meetings/ViewPastMeetings. cfm?MeetingID=843
2. Brennen PA, Zufall F. 2006. Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature 16:308-315
3. Touhara K. 2007. Molecular biology of peptide pheromone production and reception in mice. In Genetics of Sexual Differentiation and Sexually Dimorphic Behaviors. Vol.59: Advances in Genetics, ed. D Yamamoto, pp. 147-171 Cambridge, MA: Elsevier
4. Burghardt GM. 1970. Chemical perception in reptiles. In Communication by Chemical Signals, ed. JW Johnston Jr, DG Moulton, A Turk, pp. 241-308. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts
5. Cooper WE. 1994. Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:439-487
6. Gans C, Crews D, eds. Biology of the Reptilia. Vol.18: Physiology E, Hormones, Brain, and Behavior. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
7. Halpern M. 1992. Nasal chemical senses in reptiles: structure and function. See Ref. 6, pp. 423-523
8. Halpern M, Martínez-Marcos A. 2003. Structure and function of the vomeronasal system: an update. Prog. Neurobiol. 70:245-318 (Pubitemid 37287601)
9. Martínez-Marcos A, Lanuza E, Halpern M. 2002. Neural substrates for processing chemosensory information in snakes. Brain Res. Bull. 57:543-546 (Pubitemid 34234922)
10. Alberts AC, Phillips JA, Werner DI. 1993. Sources of intraspecific variability in the protein composition of lizard femoral gland secretions. Copeia 1993:775-781
11. Simon C. 1983. A review of lizard chemoreception. In Lizard Ecology, Studies of a Model Organism, ed. RB Huey, ER Pianka, TW Schoener, pp. 119-133 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
12. Alberts AC. 1990. Chemical properties of femoral gland secretions in the desert iguana Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:13-25
13. Ferguson B, Bradshaw SD, Cannon JR. 1985. Hormonal control of femoral gland secretion in the lizard, Amphibolurus ornatus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 57:371-376
14. Martín J, López P, Gabirot M, Pilz KM. 2007. Effects of testosterone supplementation on chemical signals of male Iberian wall lizards: consequences for female mate choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61:1275-1282 (Pubitemid 46733860)
15. Franceschini V, Lazzari M, Ciana F. Identification of surface glycoconjugates in the olfactory system of turtle. Brain Res. 725:81-87
16. Shine R, Mason RT. 2001. Courting male garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) use multiple cues to identify potential mates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49:465-473 (Pubitemid 32442546)
17. Smith MT, Mason RT. 1997. Gonadotropin antagonist modulates courtship behavior in male red-sided garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Physiol. Behav. 61:137-143
18. Mason RT. 1992. Reptilian pheromones. See Ref. 6, pp. 114-228
19. Mason RT. 1993. Chemical ecology of the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Brain Behav. Evol. 41:261-268
20. Houck LD, Watts RA, Arnold SA, Kiemnec KM, Bowman KE, et al. 2008. A recombinant courtship pheromone affects sexual receptivity in a plethodontid salamander. Chemical Senses 33:623-631
21. Whittier JM, Tokarz RR. 1992. Physiological regulation of sexual behavior in female reptiles. See Ref. 6, pp. 24-69
22. Aragón P, López P, Martín J. 2001. Discrimination of femoral gland secretions from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by male Iberian rock-lizards, Lacerta monticola. J. Herpetol. 35:346-350 (Pubitemid 32532962)
23. Aragón P, López P, Martín J. 2001. Chemosensory discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by lizards: implication of field spatial relationships between males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50:128-133 (Pubitemid 32635600)
24. Moreira PL, López P, Martín J. 2006. Femoral secretions and copulatory plugs convey chemical information about male identity and dominance status in Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60:166-174 (Pubitemid 43846642)
25. Lúpez P, Amo L, Martín J. 2006. Reliable signaling by chemical cues of male traits and health state in male lizards, Lacerta monticola. J. Chem. Ecol. 32:439-487
26. Araǵon P, López P, Martín J. 2006. Roles of male residence and relative size in the social behavior of Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59:762-769
27. Johansson BG, Jones TM. 2007. The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 82:265-289 (Pubitemid 46587940)
28. Olsson M. 1994. Nuptial coloration in the sand lizard Lacerta agilis: an intrasexual selected cue to fighting ability. Anim. Behav. 48:607-613 (Pubitemid 2126270)
29. Olsson M, Madsen T. 2001. Promiscuity in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) and adder snakes (Vipera berus). J. Hered. 92:190-197
30. Olsson M. 1993. Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:37-41 (Pubitemid 24406791)
31. Olsson M, Madsen T, Nordby J, Wapstra E, Ujvari B, Wittsell H. 2003. Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270(Suppl. 2):S254-56 (Pubitemid 37430871)
32. Penn DJ, Potts WK. 1999. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 153:145-164 (Pubitemid 29139433)
33. Cheetham SA, Thom MD, Jury F, Ollier WER, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL. 2007. The genetic basis of individual-recognition signals in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 17:1771-1777 (Pubitemid 47576673)
34. Kelliher KR. 2007. The combined role of the main olfactory and vomeronasal systems in social communication in mammals. Horm. Behav. 52:561-570
35. Wabnitz PA, Bowie JH, Tyler MJ, Wallace JC, Smith BP. 2000. Differences in the skin peptides of the male and female Australian tree frog Litoria splendida. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:269-275
36. Byrne PG, Keogh JS. 2007. Terrestrial toadlets use chemosignals to recognize conspecifics, locate mates and strategically adjust calling behaviour. Anim. Behav. 74:1155-1162
37. Pearl CA, Cervantes M, Chan M, Ho U, Shoji R, Thomas EO. 2000. Evidence for a mate-attracting chemosignal in the dwarf African clawed frog, Hymenochirus. Horm. Behav. 38:67-74 (Pubitemid 30626784)
38. Moreno N, Morona R, López JM, Dominguez L, Muñoz M, González A. 2008. Anuran olfactory bulb organization: embryology, neurochemistry and hodology. Brain Res. Bull. 75:241-245 (Pubitemid 351335174)
39. Hagino-Yamagishi K, Moriya K, Kubo H, Wakabayashi Y, Isobe N, et al. 2004. Expression of vomeronasal receptor genes in Xenopus laevis. J. Comp. Neurol. 472:246-256 (Pubitemid 384?9024)
40. Park D, McGuire JM, Majchrzak AL, Ziobro JM, Eisthen HL. 2004. Discrimination of conspecific sex and reproductive condition using chemical cues in axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum). J. Comp. Physiol. A 190:415-427 (Pubitemid 40882724)
41. Eisthen H, Polese G. 2006. Evolution of vertebrate olfactory subsystems. In Evolution of Nervous Systems. Vol.2: Non-Mammalian Vertebrates, ed. JH Kaas, pp. 355-406. Oxford, UK: Academic
42. Wirsig-Wiechmann CR, Houck LD, Feldhoff PW, Feldhoff RC. 2002. Pheromonal activation of vomeronasal neurons in plethodontid salamanders. Brain Res. 952:335-344
43. Wirsig-Wiechmann CR, Houck LD, Wood JM, Feldhoff PW, Feldhoff RC. 2006. Male pheromone protein components activate female vomeronasal neurons in the salamander Plethodon shermani. BMC Neurosci. 7:26
44. Arnold SJ, Houck LD. 1982. Courtship pheromones: evolution by natural and sexual selection. In Biochemical Aspects of Evolutionary Biology, ed. M Nitecki, pp. 173-211. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
45. Kikuyama S, Yamamoto K, Iwata T, Toyoda F. 2002. Peptide and protein pheromones and amphibians. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 132:69-74
46. Iwata T, Conlon JM, Nakada T, Toyoda F, Yamamoto K, Kikuyama S. 2004. Processing of multiple forms of preprosodefrin in the abdominal gland of the red-bellied newt Cynops pyrrhogaster: regional and individual differences in preprosodefrin gene expression. Peptides 25:1537-1543 (Pubitemid 39221535)
47. Kikuyama S, Nakada T, Toyoda F, Iwata T, Yamamoto K, Conlon JM. 2005. Amphibian pheromones and endocrine control of their secretion. Trends Comp. Endocrinol. Neurobiol. 1040:123-130 (Pubitemid 40979767)
48. Toyoda F, Tanaka S, Matsuda K, Kikuyama S. 1994. Hormonal control of response to and secretion of sex attractants in Japanese newts. Physiol. Behav. 55:569-576 (Pubitemid 24088030)
49. Toyoda F, Kikuyama S. 2000. Hormonal influence on the olfactory response to a female-attracting pheromone, sodefrin, in the newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 126:239-245 (Pubitemid 30389588)
50. Hasunuma I, Sakai T, Nakada T, Toyoda F, Namiki H, Kikuyama S. 2007. Molecular cloning of three types of arginine vasotocin receptor in the newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 151:252-258 (Pubitemid 46559949)
51. Nakada T, Toyoda F, Iwata T, Yamamoto K, Conlon JM, et al. 2007. Isolation, characterization and bioactivity of a region-specific pheromone, [Val8]sodefrin from the newt Cynops pyrrhogaster. Peptides 28:774-780 (Pubitemid 46349325)
52. Kawamura T, Sawada S. 1959. On the sexual isolation among different species and local races of Japanese newts. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. B Div. 1 18:17-31
53. Adams EM. 2004. Reproductive strategies of the Ocoee Salamander, Desmognathus ocoee. PhD thesis. Oregon State Univ. 113 pp.
54. Houck LD, Sever DM. 1994. Role of the skin in reproduction and behaviour. In Amphibian Biology. Vol.1: The Integument, ed. H Heatwole, GT Barthalmus, pp. 351-381 Chipping Norton, Aust.: Surrey Beatty & Sons
55. Houck LD, Arnold SJ. 2003. Courtship and mating. In Phylogeny and Reproductive Biology of Urodela (Amphibia), ed. DM Sever, pp. 383-424. Enfield, NH: Sci. Publ.
56. Arnold SJ. 1976. Sexual behavior, sexual interference and sexual defense in the salamanders Ambystoma maculatum, Ambystoma tigrinum, and Plethodon jordani. Zeit. Tierpsychol. 42:247-300
57. Houck LD. 1986. The evolution of salamander courtship pheromones. In Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Vol.4, ed. Duvall D, Muller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 173-190
58. Dawley CM, Bass AH. 1989. Chemical access to the vomeronasal organs of a plethodontid salamander. J. Morphol. 200(2):163-174
59. Rollmann SM, Houck LH, Feldhoff RC. 1999. Proteinaceous pheromone affecting female receptivity in a terrestrial salamander. Science 285:1907-1909 (Pubitemid 129515510)
60. Rollmann SM, Houck LH, Feldhoff RC. 2003. Conspecific and heterospecific pheromone effects on female receptivity. Anim. Behav. 66:857-861
61. Houck LD, Watts RA, Mead LS, Palmer CA, Arnold SA, et al. 2007. A new candidate pheromone, SPF, increases female receptivity in a salamander. In Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Vol.11, ed. J Hurst, R Beynon, SC Roberts, pp. 213-230 New York, New York: Springer
62. Houck LD. 1998. Integrative studies of amphibians: From molecules to mating. Amer. Zool. 38:108-117 (Pubitemid 128058927)
63. Laberge F, Feldhoff RC, Feldhoff PW, Houck LD. 2008. Courtship pheromone-induced c-FOS-like immunolabeling in the female salamander brain. Neuroscience 151:329-339
64. Laberge F, Roth G. 2005. Connectivity and cytoarchitecture of the ventral telencephalon in the salamander Plethodon shermani. J. Comp. Neurol. 482:176-200 (Pubitemid 40066648)
65. Hollis DM, Chu J, Walthers EA, Heppner BL, Searcy BT, Moore FL. 2005. Neuroanatomical distribution of vasotocin and mesotocin in two urodele amphibians (Plethodon shermani and Taricha granulosa) based on in situ hybridization histochemistry. Brain Res. 1035:1-12 (Pubitemid 40248531)
66. Feldhoff RC, Rollmann SM, Houck LD. 1999. Chemical analyses of courtship pheromones in a plethodontid salamander. In Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, ed. RE Johnston, D Muller-Schwarze, PW Sorenson, pp. 117-125 New York: Kluwer Acad./Plenum
67. Watts RA, Palmer CA, Feldhoff RC, Feldhoff PW, Houck LD, et al. 2004. Stabilizing selection on behavior and morphology masks positive selection on the signal in a salamander pheromone signaling complex. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1032-1041
68. Palmer CA, Houck LD. 2005. Responses to sex- and species-specific chemical signals in allopatric and sympatric salamander species. In Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Vol.10, ed. Mason RT, LeMaster MP, Müller-Schwarze D, pp. 32-41. New York: Kluwer Acad./Plenum
69. Palmer CA, Hollis DM, Watts RA, Houck LD, McCall MA, et al. 2007. Plethodontid modulating factor, a hypervariable salamander courtship pheromone in the three-finger protein superfamily. FEBS J. 274:2300-2310
70. Dulac C, Torello AT. 2003. Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4:551-562 (Pubitemid 37271366)
71. Kimoto H, Sato K, Nodari F, Haga S, Holy TE, Touhara K. 2007. Sex- and strain-specific expression and vomeronasal activity of mouse ESP family peptides. Curr. Biol. 17:1879-1884 (Pubitemid 350016920)
72. Ryan MJ, Rand AS. 2003. Sexual selection and female preference space: how female tu ́ ngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals. Evolution 57:2608-2618
73. Gerhardt HC. 1992. Multiple messages in acoustic signals. Sem. Neurosci. 4:391-400
74. Gerhardt HC. 2005. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms. Anim. Behav. 70:39-48
75. Kelso EC, Martins EP. 2008. Effects of two courtship display components on female reproductive behaviour and physiology in the sagebrush lizard. Anim. Behav. 18:75:639-646
76. Greenfield MD. 2002. Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
77. Wyatt TD. 2003. Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. Cambridge Univ. Press
78. Novotny MV, Ma W, Zidek L, Daev E. 1999. Recent biochemical insights into puberty acceleration, estrus induction and puberty delay in the house mouse. In Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, ed. RE Johnston, D Muller-Schwarze, PW Sorenson, pp. 99-126. New York: Kluwer Acad./Plenum
79. Meredith M. 1998. Vomeronasal, olfactory, hormonal convergence in the brain: cooperation or coincidence? Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 855:349-361 (Pubitemid 29110005)
80. Mayeaux DJ, Johnston RE. 2004. Discrimination of social odors and their locations: role of lateral entorhinal area. Physiol. Behav. 82:653-662
81. Palumbi SR. 1999. All males are not created equal: Fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12632-12637
82. Yang Z, Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD. 2000. Maximum-likelihood analysis of molecular adaptation in abalone sperm lysin reveals variable selective pressures among lineages and sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1446-1455 (Pubitemid 30740406)
83. McCartney MA, Lessios HA. 2004. Adaptive evolution of sperm bindin tracks egg incompatibility in neotropical sea urchins of the genus Echinometra. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:732-745
84. Turner LM, Hoekstra HE. 2006. Adaptive evolution of fertilization proteins within a genus: variation in ZP2 and ZP3 in deer mice (Peromyscus). Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:1656-1669
85. Emes RD, Beatson SA, Ponting CP, Goodstadt L. 2004. Evolution and comparative genomics of odorantand pheromone-associated genes in rodents. Genome Res. 14:591-602 (Pubitemid 38500230)
86. Galindo BE, Vacquier VD, Swanson WJ. 2003. Positive selection in egg receptor for abalone sperm lysin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:4639-4643
87. Panhuis TM, Clark NL, Swanson WJ. 2006. Rapid evolution of reproductive proteins in abalone and Drosophila. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 361:261-268 (Pubitemid 44870112)
88. Levitan DR, Ferrell DL. 2007. Selection on gamete recognition proteins depends on sex, density, and genotype frequency. Science 312:267-269
89. Chamero P, Marton TF, Logan DW, Flanagan K, Cruz JR, et al. 2007. Identification of protein pheromones that promote aggressive behaviour. Nature 450:899-902 (Pubitemid 350231315)
90. Galindo BE, Moy GW, Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD. 2003. Full-length sequence of VERL, the egg vitelline envelope receptor for abalone sperm lysin. Gene 288:111-117
91. Begun DJ, Lindfors HA. 2006. Rapid evolution of genomic Acp complement in the melanogaster subgroup of Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:2010-2021
92. Dulac C. 2000. Sensory coding of pheromone signals in mammals. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10:511-518 (Pubitemid 30614513)
93. Luo M, Katz LC. 2004. Encoding pheromonal signals in the mammalian vomeronasal system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14:428-434 (Pubitemid 39078489)