Changes in functional status among persons over age sixty-five undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Medical Care

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 742-748

  Sloan, Frank A ^a   Ruiz, David ^a   Platt, Alyssa ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Elderly; Outcomes; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REPORTING; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MEDICARE; MOBILITY LIMITATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67649778760     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5ae3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, et al. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham study. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:351-358.
2. Jinks C, Jordan K, Croft P. Osteoarthritis as a public health problem: the impact of developing knee pain on physical function in adults living in the community: (KNEST 3). Rheumatology. 2007;46:877-881.
3. Jordan J, Kington R, Lane N, et al. Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:635.
4. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, et al. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:93-110.
5. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Suarez-Almazor ME. Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2003;83:696.
6. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(-A):963-974.
7. Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, et al. The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1719-1724.
8. Rankin EA, Alarcon G, Chang R, et al. NIH consensus statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;86 (-A):1328-1335.
9. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. Results of the knee replacement patient outcomes research team study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163-173.
10. George L, Ruiz DJ, Sloan F. The effects of total knee arthroplasty on physical functioning in the older population. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58: 3166-3171.
11. Fortin P, Clarke A, Joseph L, et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1722-1728.
12. Fitzgerald J, Orav E, Lee T, et al. Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51: 100-109.
13. Kane R, Saleh K, Wilt T, et al. Total Knee Replacement. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003:150.
14. Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995;33:AS131-AS144.
15. Freund D, Lave J, Clancy C, et al. Patient outcomes research teams: contribution to outcomes and effectiveness research. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:337-361.
16. Linda K. George, DR JFAS. The effects of total knee arthroplasty on physical functioning in the older population. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58: 3166-3171.
17. Jones CA, Beaupre L, Johnston DWC, et al. Total Joint Arthroplasties: Current Concepts of Patient Outcomes After Surgery. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 2007;33:71-86.
18. Bellamy N. WOMAC 3.1 Index. 2001. Available at: http://www.womac. org/womac/index.htm. Accessed February 23, 2008.
19. Trust MO, Incorporated Q. SF-36 Health Survey. 2002. Available at: http://www.sf-36.org/tools/sf36.shtml. Accessed February 23, 2008.
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale, of The Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14.
21. Patrick D, Erickson P. Types of Health Related Quality of Life Assessments. eds. Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993:478.
22. Wallace RB, Herzog AR. Overview of the health measures in the health and retirement study. J Hum Resources. 1995;30:S84-S107.
23. Fonda S, Herzog AR (2004). Documentation of physical functioning measured in the health and retirement study and the asset and health dynamics among the oldest old study. HRS/AHEAD Documentation Reports. S. R. Center. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan: 61.
24. Becker S, Ichino A. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal. 2002;2:358-377.
25. Austin P. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:1128-1135.
26. Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. Some practical guidelines for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv. 2008;22:31-72.
27. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
28. Austin P, Grootendorst P, Anderson G. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2007;26:734-753.
29. Stata. Version 10. Boston: Boston College Department of Economics; 2003.
30. Jones CA, Voaklander D, Johnston W, et al. The Effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:454-460.
31. Kennedy D, Stratford P, Riddle D, et al. Assessing recovery and establishing prognosis following total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther2008;88:22-32.
32. Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Iossi MF, et al. Cemented rotatingplatform total knee replacement: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1995-1998.
33. Loughead JM, Malhan K, Mitchell SY, et al. Outcome following knee arthroplasty beyond 15 years. Knee. 2008;15:85-90.
34. Ranawat C, Flynn W, Saddler S, et al. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: a 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:94-102.
35. Kriegsman D, Penninx B, van Eijk J, et al. Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly: a study on the accuracy of patients' self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1407-1417.
36. Creamer P, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Hochberg MC. Factors associated with functional impairment in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2000;39:490-496.
37. Hutchings A, Callaway M, Choy E, et al. The Longitudinal Examination of Arthritis Pain (LEAP) Study: relationships between weekly fluctuations in patient-related joint pain and other health outcomes. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:2291-2300.
38. Mayo NEP, Nadeau LM, Levesque LBM, et al. Does the addition of functional status indicators to case-mix adjustment indices improve prediction of hospitalization, institutionalization, and death in the elderly? Med Care. 2005;43:1194-1202.
39. Yelin E, Trupin L, Wong B, et al. The impact of functional status and change in functional status on mortality over 18 years among persons with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1851-1857.
40. Jain N, Higgins L, Ozumba D, et al. Trends in epidemiology of knee arthroplasty in the United States, 1990-2000. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52:3928-3933.
41. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, et al. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87:1487-1497.
42. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:780-785.
43. Kurtz S, Ong K, Schmier J, et al. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89: 144-151.
44. Perreira KM, Sloan FA. Living healthy and living long: valuing the nonpecuniary loss from disability and death. J Risk Uncertain. 2002;24: 5-29.