Reliability and validity of scores from the inventory of drug use consequences

Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 17-27

  Gillaspy, J Arthur ^a   Campbell, Todd C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649681541     PISSN: 10553835     EISSN: 21611874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1874.2006.tb00015.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mentaldisorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Arciniega, L. T., Arroyo, J. A., and Miller, W. R., (1996). Alcohol, drug use and consequences among Hispanics seeking treatment for alcohol-related problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 613-618.
3. Babor, T. F., Longabaugh, R., Zweben, A., Fuller, R. K., Stout, R. L., Anton, R. S., et al. (1994). Issues in the definition and measurement of drinking outcomes in alcoholism treatment research. Journal of Studies of Alcohol, 12, 101-111.
4. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., and Brown, G. K., (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
5. Blanchard, K. A., Morgenstern, J., Morgan, T. J., Labouvie, E. W., and Bux, D. A., (2003). Assessing consequences of substance use: Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Drug Use Consequences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 328-331.
6. Borenstein, M., and Rothstein, H., (1999). Comprehensive meta-analysis: A computer program for research synthesis. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
7. Cicchetti, D. V., (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
8. Comtois, K. A., Tisdall, W. A., Holdcraft, L. C., and Simpson, T., (2005). Dual diagnosis: Impact of family history. American Journal of Addictions, 14, 291-299.
9. Gillaspy, J. A., Wright, A. R., Stokes, S., Campbell, C., and Adinoff, B., (2002). Group alliance and cohesion as predictors of alcohol and drug treatment outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 213-229.
10. Gorsuch, R. L., (1983). Factor analysis(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Hedges, L. N., and Olkin, I., (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
12. Horn, J. L., Wanberg, K. W., and Foster, P. L., (1987). Guide to the Alcohol Use Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
13. Institute of Medicine. (1990). Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umpress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiiski, J., and Burlingame, G. M., (1997). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2. Stevenson, MD: American Professional Credentialing Services.
15. Liebschutz, J., Savetsky, J. B., Saitz, R., Horton, N. J., Lloyd-Travaglini, C., and Samet, J. H., (2002). The relationship between sexual and physical abuse and substance abuse consequences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 121-128.
16. Maisto, S. A., and McKay, J. R., (1995). Diagnosis. In J. P.Allen & M.Columbus (Eds.), Assessing alcohol problems: A guide for clinicians and researchers (pp. 41-54). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
17. McLellan, A. T., Kushner, H., Merger, D., Peters, R., Smith, L., Grissom, et al. (1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199-213.
18. Miller, W. M., and Rollnick, S., (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
19. Miller, W. M., Tonigan, J. S., and Longabaugh, R., (1995). The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institute of Health.
20. Sobell, L. C., and Sobell, M. B., (1992). Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In R. Z.Litten & J. P.Allen (Eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biochemical methods (pp. 41-72). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
21. Shrout, P. E., and Fleiss, J. L., (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-427.
22. Tinsley, H. E., and Tinsley, D. J., (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414-424.
23. Tonigan, J. S., and Miller, W. M., (2002). The Inventory of Drug Use Consequences (InDUC): Test-retest stability and sensitivity to detect change. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 165-168.