Effects of haptic device attributes on vibration detection thresholds

Proceedings - 3rd Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 115-120

  Salisbury, Curt ^a   Gillespie, R Brent ^b   Tan, Hong ^c   Barbagli, Federico ^a   Salisbury, J Kenneth ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

H.5.2 information interfaces and presentation ; User interfaces haptic I O

Indexed keywords

DETECTION EXPERIMENTS; DETECTION THRESHOLD; H.5.2 [INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION]; HAPTIC DEVICES; HIGH FIDELITY; MECHANICAL DEVICE; NON-LINEARITY; PRIMARY SOURCES; SIGNAL CORRUPTION; VIBRATION DETECTION; VIBROTACTILE; VOICE-COIL;

MICE (COMPUTER PERIPHERALS); REMOTE CONTROL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 67649670426     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2009.4810875     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. P. Mouroulis. Contrast sensitivity in the assessment of visual instruments. Assessment of Imaging Systems: Visible and Infrared SPIE, 274:202-210, 1981.
2. T.A. Kern, A. Schaeffer, and R. Werthschutzky. An interaction model for the quantification of haptic impressions. EuroHaptics, pages 139-145, 2008.
3. S. Choi and H.Z. Tan. Perceived instability of virtual haptic texture. i. experimental studies. Presence, 13(4):395-415, 2004.
4. S. Choi and H.Z. Tan. Perceived instability of virtual haptic texture. ii. effect of collision-detection algorithm. Presence, 14(4):463-481, 2005.
5. S. Choi and H.Z. Tan. Perceived instability of virtual haptic texture. iii. effect of update rate. Presence, 16(3):56-60, 2007.
6. G. Campion and V. Hayward. Fundamental limits in the rendering of virtual haptic interfaces. In WHC 05, pages 263-270, 2005.
7. S.J. Lederman, R.L. Klatzky, C.L. Hamilton, and G.I. Ramsay. Perceiving roughness via a rigid probe: Psychophysical effects of exploration speed and mode of touch. Haptics-e (http://www.haptics-e.org), 1999.
8. S.J. Bolanowski, G.A. Gescheider, R.T. Verrillo, and C.M. Checkosky. Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 84(5):1680-1694, 1988.
9. R. Johansson and A. B. Vallbo. Tactile sensory coding inthe glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends in Neuroscience, 6:27-31, 1983.
10. http://www.chai3d.com.
11. H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psuchoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49:467-477, 1971.
12. A. Israr, S. Choi, and H.Z. Tan. Detection threshold and mechanical impedance of the hand in a pen-hold posture. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, pages 472-477, Beijing, China, 2006.
13. V. Hayward and O.R. Astley. Performance measures for haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of Robotics Research: The 7th International Symposium, pages 195-207, 1996.