Stiffness discrimination with visual and proprioceptive cues

Proceedings - 3rd Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 121-126

  Gurari, Netta ^a   Kuchenbecker, Katherine J ^b   Okamura, Allison M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

H.1.2 models and principles ; H.5.1 information interfaces and presentation ; J.4 social and behavioral sciences ; Psychology; User interfaces haptic I O; User machine systems human factors

Indexed keywords

H.1.2 [MODELS AND PRINCIPLES]; H.5.1 [INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION]; J.4 [SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES]; PSYCHOLOGY; USER/MACHINE SYSTEMS-HUMAN FACTORS;

FEEDBACK; FORCE MEASUREMENT; HUMAN ENGINEERING; JOINTS (ANATOMY); MICE (COMPUTER PERIPHERALS); REMOTE CONTROL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STIFFNESS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 67649658387     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2009.4810845     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. K. Bark, J. W. Wheeler, S. Premakumar, and M. R. Cutkosky. Comparison of skin stretch and vibrotactile stimulation for feedback of proprioceptive information. In Proc. 16th Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pages 71-78, 2008.
2. D. F. Collins and A. Prochazka. Movement illusions evoked by ensemble cutaneous input from the dorsum of the human hand. J. Physiology, 496(3):857-871, 1996.
3. D. F. Collins, K. M. Refshauge, G. Todd, and S. C. Gandevia. Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. J. Neurophysiology, 94(3):1699-1706, 2005.
4. G. S. Dhillon and K. W. Horch. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 13(4):468-472, Dec. 2005.
5. B. B. Edin. Quantitative analyses of dynamic strain sensitivity in human skin mechanoreceptors. J. Neurophysiol., 92:3233-3243, 2004.
6. S. C. Gandevia, J. L. Smith, M. Crawford, U. Proske, and J. L. Taylor. Motor commands contribute to human position sense. J. Physiology, 571(3):703-710, 2006.
7. G. A. Gescheider. Psycophysics: the fundamentals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 3rd edition, 1997.
8. C. Ghez, J. Gordon, M. F. Ghilardi, C. N. Christakos, and S. E. Cooper. Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, pages 837-847, 1990.
9. J. A. S. Kelso. Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(4):529-543, Nov. 1977.
10. K. J. Kuchenbecker, N. Gurari, and A. M. Okamura. Effects of visual and proprioceptive motion feedback on human control of targeted movement. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pages 513-524, 2007.
11. T. A. Kuiken, L. A. Miller, R. D. Lipschutz, K. A. Stubblefield, and G. A. Dumanian. Prosthetic command signals following targeted hyper-reinnervation nerve transfer surgery. In Proc. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conf., pages 7652-7655, Sept. 2005.
12. R. H. LaMotte. Softness discrimination with a tool. J. Neurophysiology, 83(4):1777-1786, Apr. 2000.
13. D. D. Larish, C. M. Volp, and S. A. Wallace. An empirical note on attaining a spatial target after distorting the initial conditions of movement via muscle vibration. J. Motor Behavior, 16(1):76-83, 1984.
14. A. Lécuyer, J.-M. Burkhardt, S. Coquillart, and P. Coiffet. "Boundary of illusion": An experiment of sensory integration with a pseudohaptic system. In Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pages 115-122, 2001.
15. A. Lécuyer, S. Coquillart, A. Kheddar, P. Richard, and P. Coiffet. Pseudo-haptic feedback: Can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? In Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pages 83-90, 2000.
16. S. J. Lederman and R. A. Klatzky. Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychol., 19(3):342-368, 1987.
17. D. I. McCloskey. Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiological Reviews, 58(4):763-820, Oct. 1978.
18. A. Pressman, L. J. Welty, A. Karniel, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi. Perception of delayed stiffness. International J. Robotics Research, 26(11-12):1191-1203, 2007.
19. P. E. Roland and H. Ladegaard-Pedersen. A quantitative analysis of sensations of tensions and of kinaesthesia in man. Brain: a Journal of Neurology, 100(4):671-692, 1977.
20. M. A. Srinivasan and R. H. LaMotte. Tactual discrimination of softnesss. J. of Neurophysiology, 73(1):88-101, 1995.
21. H. Z. Tan, N. I. Durlach, G. L. Beauregard, and M. A. Srinivasan. Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 4(57):495-510, 1995.
22. H. Z. Tan, N. I. Durlach, Y. Shao, and M. Wei. Manual resolution of compliance when work and force cues are minimized. In Proc. 2nd Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 49, pages 99-104, 1993.
23. H. Z. Tan, X. D. Pang, and N. I. Durlach. Manual resolution of length, force, and compliance. In Proc. 1st Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 42, pages 13-18, 1992.
24. V. Varadharajan, R. Klatzky, B. Unger, R. Swendsen, and R. Hollis. Haptic rendering and psychophysical evaluation of a virtual threedimensional helical spring. In Proc. 16th Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pages 57-64, 2008.
25. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8):1293-1313, 2001.