ERP evidence of tactile texture processing: Effects of roughness and movement

Proceedings - 3rd Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 166-171

  Ballesteros, Soledad ^a   Muñoz, Francisco ^a   Sebastián, Manuel ^a   García, Beatriz ^a   Reales, José Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

ERP; Roughness; Tactile texture perception

Indexed keywords

BIPHASIC; BRAIN ACTIVATION; CORTICAL MECHANISMS; ERP; EVOKED POTENTIALS; INTERMEDIATE VELOCITIES; NEURAL MECHANISMS; PEAK SPACING; ROUGHNESS; SENSORY PROCESSING; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TACTILE ROUGHNESS; TACTILE STIMULI; TACTILE TEXTURE; TACTILE TEXTURE PERCEPTION; TRIANGULAR GRATINGS;

ACTIVATION ANALYSIS; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; MICE (COMPUTER PERIPHERALS); REMOTE CONTROL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TEXTURES; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 67649656321     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2009.4810901     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. M. A.Heller and S. Ballesteros. Introduction: Approaches to touch and blindness. In Morton A. Heller and Soledad Ballesteros, editors: Touch and blindness. Psychology and neuroscience. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1-21, 2006.
2. S. Ballesteros and M. A. Heller. Haptic object identification. In M. Grunwald, editor, Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications. Boston: Birkhäser Verlag, 183-198, 2008.
3. R. L. Klatzky, S. J. Lederman, and C. Reed. There's more to touch than meets the eye: Relative salience of object dimensions for touch with and without vision. J Exp Psych: General, 116:356-369, 1987.
4. D. Katz. The world of touch. In Krueger, LE, translator. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
5. S. J. Lederman and M. M. Taylor. Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percept Psychophysics, 12:401-408, 1972.
6. M. M. Taylor and S. J. Lederman. Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: A model and the effect of friction. Percept Psychophysics, 17:23-26, 1975.
7. D. T. Blake, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson. Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: The relative contribution of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. J Neurosci, 17:7480-7489, 1997.
8. J. R. Phillips, K. O. Johnson. Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol, 46:1192-1203, 1981.
9. M. Hollins, S. J. Bensmaïa, and E. A. Roy. Vibrotaction and texture perception. Behavioral Brain Research, 2002: 135, 51-56, 2002.
10. M. Hollins and S. R. Risner. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percep Psychophysics, 62:695-705, 2000.
11. M. Hollins and S. J. Bensmaïa. The coding of roughness. Can J of Exp Psych. 61:194-193, 2007.
12. M. A. Lawrence, R. Kitada, R. L. Klatzky, and S. J. Lederman. Haptic roughness perception of linear gratings via bare finger or rigid probe. Perception, 36:547-557, 2007.
13. M Hollins, R. Faldowsky, S. Rao, and F. Young. Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture. Percept Psychophysics, 54:697-705, 1993.
14. M. Hollins, S. Bensmaïa, K. Karlof, and F. Young. Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Percep Psychophysics, 62:1534-1544, 2000.
15. S. Ballesteros., J. M. Reales, L. Ponce de León, and B. García. The perception of ecological textures by touch: Does the perceptual space change under bimodal Visual and haptic exploration? In WorldHAPTICS 2005. First Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptics Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleopertors Systems. IEEE Computer Society, 635-639, 2005.
16. S. Ballesteros, J. M. Reales, B. García, and L. Ponce de León. Perceptual dimensions of haptic textures space by young and older adults. In Soledad Ballesteros and Morton A Heller, editors, Aging, Cognition and Neuroscience. Madrid: UNED, 127-147, 2006.
17. W. M. Bergman Tiest and A. M. L. Kappers. Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychologica, 124:177-189, 2007.
18. K. O. Johnson, S. S. Hsiao, and T. Yoshioka. Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics. Neuroscientist, 8: 111-121, 2002.
19. F. C. Hellweg, W. Schultz, and O. D. Creutzfeldt. Extracellular and intracellular recordings from cat's cortical whisker projection area: thalamocortical response transformation. J Neurophysiol, 40:463-79, 1977.
20. A. J. McComas and C. M. Cupido. The RULER model. Is this how the somatosensory works? Clin Neurophysiol, 110:1987-1994, 1999.
21. R. Näätänen. Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull, 92: 605-640, 1982.
22. S. A. Hillyard, R. F. Hink, V. L. Schwent, and T. W. Picton. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182:177-80, 1973.
23. R. Näätänen, A. W. Gaillard, and S. Mäntysalo. Early selectiveattention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted: 42, 313-29, 1978.
24. S. J. Luck, S. A. Hillyard, W. Mouloua, M. G. Woldorff, V. P. Clark, and H. L. Hawkins. Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 20: 887-904, 1994.
25. J. T. Coull. Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol: 55, 343-61, 1998.
26. R. Näätänen and T. Picton. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiol, 24:375-425, 1987.
27. G. R. Mangun and S. A. Hillyard. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming, 17:1057-74, 1991.
28. S. Makeig, M. Westerfield, J. Townsend, T. P. Jung, E. Courchesne, and T. J. Sejnowski. Functionally independent components of early event-related potentials in a visual spatial attention task. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 354:1135-44, 1999.
29. E. T. Rolls, J. O'DohercyJ, M. L. Kringelbach, S. Francis, R. Bowtell and F. McGlone. Representations of pleasant and painful touch in the human orbitofrontal and cingulated cortices. Cerebral Cortex, 13: 308-317, 2003.
30. H. Burton, T. O. Videen, and M. E. Raichle. Tactile-vibrationactivated faci in insula and parietal opercular cortex studied with positron emission tomography: mapping the second somatosensory area in humans. Somatosens Motor Res, 10: 297-308, 1993.
31. H. Burton, A. M. MacLeod, T. O. Videen, and M. E. Raichle. Multiple foci in parietal and frontal cortex activated by rubbing embossed grating patterns across fingerpads: a positron emission tomography study in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 7:3-17, 1997.
32. A. Ledberg, B. T. O'Sullivan, S. Kinomura, and P. E. Roland. Somatosensory activations of the parietal operculum of man. A PET study. Eur J of Neursci, 7:1934-1941, 1995.
33. P. E. Roland, B. T. O'Sullivan, and R. Kawashima. Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95: 3295-3300. 1998.
34. R. Kitada, T. Hashimoto, T. Kochiyama, T. Kito, T. Okada, M. Matsumura, S. J. Lederman, and N. Sadato. Tactile estimation of the roughness of gratings yields a graded response in the human brain: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 25:90-100, 2005.