Word and pseudoword superiority effects in Italian-English bilinguals

Bilingualism

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 113-120

  Grossi, Giordana ^a   Murphy, Jeremy ^a   Boggan, Josh ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649646393     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728908003891     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alternberg, E. P. & Cairns, H. S. (1983). The effects of phonotactic constraints on lexical processing in bilingual and monolingual subjects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 174-188.
2. Barca, L., Burani, C. & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 424-434.
3. Baron, J. (1974). Facilitation of perception by spelling constraints. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 37-50.
4. Baron, J. & Thurston, I. (1973). An analysis of the word-superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207-228.
5. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A. & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25 (4), 447-457.
6. Carr, T. H. & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at the current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinnon (eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, vol. 5, pp. 1-82. New York: Academic Press.
7. Chase, C. H. & Tallal, P. (1990). A developmental, interactive activation model of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 448-487.
8. Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65-70.
9. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M. & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9 (7), 335-341.
10. Favreau, M., Komoda, M. K. & Segalowitz, N. (1980). Second language reading: Implication of theword superiority effect in skilled bilinguals. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 370-380.
11. Federici, C. & Riga, C. (2003). Ciao (5th edn.). Canada: Thomson Heinle & Heinle.
12. Forster, K. I., Mohan, K. & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanisms of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (eds.), Masked priming. The state of the art, pp. 3-37. New York: Psychology Press.
13. Frenck-Mestre, C. (1993). Use of orthographic redundancies and word identification speed in bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22 (4), 397-409.
14. Gauthier, I. & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37 (12), 1673-1682.
15. Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M. & Ziegler, J. (2003). Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87, 432-440.
16. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigation of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20 (6), 1158-1176.
17. Grainger, J. & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Science, 8 (2), 58-59.
18. Grossi, G., Thierry, G., Thomas, E. & Di Pietro, J. (2008). Word and pseudoword superiority effects in early/native Welsh-English bilinguals. Presented at 49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Chicago, 13-16 November 2008.
19. Henderson, L. & Chard, J. (1980). The reader's implicit knowledge of orthographic structure. In U. Frith (ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling, pp. 85-116. New York: Academic Press.
20. Krueger, L. E. (1992). The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding. Memory & Cognition, 20, 685-694.
21. Krueger, L. E., Keen, R. H. & Rublevich, B. (1974). Letter search through words and nonwords by adults and fourth-grade children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102 (5), 845-459.
22. Kucera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
23. LaBerge, D. (1981). Automatic information processing: A review. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (eds.), Attention and performance IX, pp. 173-186. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Laudanna, A., Thornton, A. M., Brown, G., Burani, C. & Marconi, L. (1995). Un corpus dell'italiano scritto contemporaneo dalla parte del ricevente. In S. Bolasco, L. Lebart & A. Salem (eds.), III Giornate internazionali di Analisi Statistica dei Dati Testuali, vol. I, pp. 103-109. Roma: Cisu.
25. Logan, G. D. (1992). Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105 (2), 317-339.
26. McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word formarea: Expertise for reading in the fusiformgyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (7), 293-299.
27. McCaughey, M. W., Juola, J. F., Schadler, M. & Ward, N. J. (1980). Whole-word units are used before orthographic knowledge in perceptual development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 411-421.
28. McClelland, J. L. (1976). Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 80-91.
29. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review 86, 287-330.
30. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, part I: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
31. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
32. Polk, T. A. & Farah, M. J. (1995). Late experience alters vision. Nature, 376, 648-649.
33. Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium, pp. 55-85. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Prinzmetal, W. (1992). The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope. Perception & Psychophysics, 51 (5), 473-484.
35. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81 (2), 275-280.
36. Spoehr, K. T. & Smith, E. E. (1975). The role of phonotactic and rules in perceiving letter patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 21-34.
37. van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T. & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458-483.
38. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.