An agenda for radical intellectual property reform

International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 653-661

  Kingston, William ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649627529     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494529.032     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Garrett Hardin’s The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 S C IENCE 1243 (1968).
2. J.M. BUCHANAN & G. TULLOCK, THE CALCULUS OF CONSENT 289 (1962).
3. BRUCE L. NEWMAN, THE MASS MARKETING OF POLITI C S (Sage Publications 1999).
4. ALFRED HEGGEN, ER F INDUNGS SCHUTZ UND INDUSTRIALI S IERUNG IN PREUS S EN 1793–1877, 115–118 (Go¨ttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1975).
5. JONATHAN LI E BENAU, THE CHALLENGE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY (Gower Publishing 1988).
6. P.J. Federico, Origins of Section 103, in N ONOB VIOUSN E S S – THE ULTIMATE CONDITION OF PATENTABILITY 1:10, 1:11 (John F. Witherspoon ed., Bureau of National Affairs 1978).
7. Jessica Litman, Copyright, Compromise, and Legislative History, 72 CORNELL L. REV. 857 (1987).
8. SUSAN S ELL, PR IVATE POWER: PUBL IC LAW (Cambridge University Press 2003).
9. Pamela Samuelson, The U.S. Digital Agenda at WIPO, 37 VA. J. INT’ L L. 360 (1997).
10. D.W. Spero, Patents or Piracy? A CEO Looks at Japan, 86 HARV. BUS. REV. 58 (1990).
11. J.H. Reichman, Securing Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement After U.S. v. India, 1 J. INT’ L ECON. L. 585 (1998).
12. PETER DRAHOS, & JOHN BRAITHWAITE, INFORMATION FEUDALISM: WHO OWNS THE K NOWLE DGE E CONOMY ? 90 et seq. (The New Press 2003); S ELL, above n. 9.
13. W. Kingston, Intellectual Property’s Problems: How Far is the U.S. Constitution to Blame?, 4 INTELL. PROP. Q. 315 (2002).
14. D. Vaver, Patently Absurd, OXFORD TODAY (MI CHAELMAS IS SUE), 2000
15. J. Barton, Reforming the Patent System, 287 S C IENCE 1933 (2000).
16. W. Kingston, The Case for Compulsory Arbitration: Empirical Evidence, 4 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 154 (2000).
17. W. Kingston, Intellectual Property Needs Help from Accounting, 11 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 508 (2002).
18. William Kingston, Compulsory Licencing with Capital Payments as an Alternative to Monopoly Grants for Intellectual Property, 23(5) RES. POL’ Y 661 (1994).
19. R. Mazzoleni & R.R. Nelson, Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents, 32 J. ECON. IS SUES 1031 (1998).