Policy statement - Expert witness participation in civil and criminal proceedings

Pediatrics

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 428-438

  McAbee, Gary N ^b   Brown, Jeffrey L ^b   Donn, Steven M ^b   Gonzalez, Jose L ^b   Marcus, David ^b   McDonnell, William M ^b   Mendelson, Robert A ^b   Deitschel Jr , Charles H ^b   Hollier, Lisa M ^a   Farish, C Morrison ^b   Myers, Holly ^a   Reynolds, Sally L ^b   Ake, Julie Kersten ^b  

^a AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Expert witness; Legal and ethical standards; Oversight; Peer review

Indexed keywords

CITIZENSHIP; CIVIL RIGHTS; CRIMINAL LAW; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL PROFESSION; NEGLIGENCE; PEDIATRICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; WITNESS;

EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; LICENSURE; MALPRACTICE; PEDIATRICS; RISK MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67649587142     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1132     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Medical Liability. Guidelines for expert witness testimony. Pediatrics. 1989;83(2):312-313
2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Medical Liability. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical liability cases. Pediatrics. 1994;94(5):755-756
3. Council of Medical Specialty Societies. Statement on Qualifications and Guidelines for the Physician Expert Witness. Lake Bluff, IL: Council of Medical Specialty Societies; 1989
4. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Medical Liability. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation [published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):651]. Pediatrics. 2002;109(5):974-979
5. Legal Information Institute. Federal rules of evidence [2006]. Available at: www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm. Accessed March 7, 2008
6. Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(4):245-251
7. Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc, 509 US 579 (1993)
8. Frye v United States, 293 F 1013 (DC Cir 1923)
9. General Electric Co v Joiner, 522 US 136 (1997)
10. Kumho Tire Co Ltd v Carmichael, 526 US 137 (1999)
11. Kassirer JP, Cecil JS. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts. JAMA. 2002;288(11):1382-1387 (Pubitemid 35025910)
12. Cecil JS. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(S1):S74-S80 (Pubitemid 41033422)
13. Gatowski SI, Dobbin SA, Richardson JT, Ginsburg GP, Merlino ML, Dahir V. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law Hum Behav. 2001;25(5):433-458 (Pubitemid 33743581)
14. Cf Nunez v Wilson, 507 P 2d 939 (1973)
15. Matott v Ward, 48 NY2d 455 (1979)
16. Hassman PE. Admissibility of expert medical testimony as to future consequences of injury as affected by expression in terms of probability or possibility. 75 ALR 3d 9:24 (1977)
17. Brent RL. The irresponsible expert witness: a failure of biomedical graduate education and professional accountability. Pediatrics. 1982;70(5):754-762
18. Weintraub MI. Expert witness testimony: a time for self-regulation? J Child Neurol. 1995;10(3):256-259
19. Safran A, Skydell B, Ropper S. Expert witness testimony in neurology: Massachusetts experience 1980-1990. Neurol Chron. 1992;2(7):1-6
20. Kesselheim AS, Studdert PM. Characteristics of physicians who frequently act as expert witnesses in neurologic birth injury litigation. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):273-279 (Pubitemid 44305666)
21. Garner BA, ed. Black's Law Dictionary. 8th ed. Eagen, MN: Thomson-West Publishing Co; 2004
22. Merz JF. An empirical analysis of the medical informed consent doctorine [sic]: search for a "standard" of disclosure. Available at: www.piercelaw.edu/risk/vol2/winter/merz.htm. Accessed February 28, 2008
23. Meyers v Epstein. 282 F Supp 2d 151 (SDNY 2003)
24. Lewis MH, Gohagan JK, Merenstein DJ. The locality rule and the physician's dilemma: local medical practices vs the national standard of care. JAMA. 2007;297(23):2633-2637 (Pubitemid 46961035)
25. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000
26. Mackauf SH. Neurologic malpractice: the perspective of a patient's lawyer. Neurol Clin. 1999;17(2):345-353 (Pubitemid 29226572)
27. Lobe TE. Medical Malpractice: A Physician's Guide. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1995
28. Zeier v Zimmer Inc, 152 P3d 861 (Okla 2006)
29. Kaufman NL. The demise of medical malpractice screening panels and alternative solutions based on trust and honesty. J Leg Med. 2007;28(2):247-262 (Pubitemid 46908496)
30. McAbee GN, Freeman JM. Expert medical testimony: responsibilities of medical societies. Neurology. 2005;65(2):337
31. Fadjo D, Bucciarelli RL. Peer review of the expert witness: an opportunity to improve our medical liability system. J Child Neurol. 1995;10(5):403-404
32. Vidmer N. Expert evidence, the adversary system, and the jury. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(suppl 1):S137-S143 (Pubitemid 41033427)
33. Marcovitch H. Some relief for expert witnesses. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(2):102-103 (Pubitemid 46271736)
34. McAbee GN, Deitschel C, Berger J; American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management. Pediatric medicolegal education in the 21st century. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):1790-1792
35. Donn SM. Medicolegal issues get short shrift in pediatric residency training. AAP News. 2006;27(7):16
36. American Society of General Surgeons. Education: ASGS expert witness certification program. Available at: www.theasgs.org/education/expwit.html. Accessed February 28, 2008
37. Kesselheim AS, Studdert DM. Role of professional organizations in regulating physician expert witness testimony. JAMA. 2007;298(24):2907-2909
38. Gomez JCB. Silencing the hired guns: ensuring honesty in medical expert testimony through state legislation. J Leg Med. 2005;26(3):385-399 (Pubitemid 41362033)
39. Kansas Stat Ann 60-3412 (2005)
40. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. E-6.01: contingent physician fees. Code of Medical Ethics. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1994. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/ Code-of-Med-Eth/opinion/opinion601.html. Accessed March 7, 2008
41. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. E-8.04: consultation. Code of Medical Ethics. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1996. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/Code-of- Med-Eth/opinion/opinion804.html. Accessed March 7, 2008
42. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. E-9.07: medical testimony. Code of Medical Ethics. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2004. Available at: www.amaassn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/Code-of- Med-Eth/opinion/opinion907.html. Accessed March 7, 2008
43. Joseph v District of Columbia Board of Medicine, 587 A2d 1085 (DC 1991)
44. American Medical Association. Expert Witness Testimony: Policy H-265.993. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1998 [reaffirmed 2000]. Available at: https://www.aapl.org/AMA-expert-witness.htm. Accessed March 7, 2008
45. Turner JA. Going after the "hired guns": is improper expert witness testimony unprofessional conduct or the negligent practice of medicine? Pepperdine Law Rev. 2006;33(2):275-310
46. Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v Levine, 808 SW 2d 440 (Mo App WD 1991)
47. Milunsky A. Lies, damned lies, and medical experts: the abrogation of responsibility by specialty organizations and a call for action. J Child Neurol. 2003;18(6):413-419 (Pubitemid 36857286)
48. American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Professional conduct: witness testimony. AANS Bull. 2006;15(2):3-4. Available at: www.aans.org/ bulletin/pdfs/summer06.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2008
49. Blackett WB, Pelton RM. Two disciplinary actions announced: American Academy of Neurology Board approves four PCC recommendations. AANS Bull. 2006;15(2):36-37. Available at: www.aans.org/bulletin/Issue.aspx?IssueId=31198. Accessed March 7, 2008
50. American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons. AAOS expert witness program. Available at: www3.aaos.org/member/expwit/expertwitness.cfm. Accessed February 28, 2008
51. Weintraub MI. Expert witness testimony: an update. Neurol Clin. 1999;17(2):363-369 (Pubitemid 29226574)
52. McAbee GN. Peer review of medical expert witnesses. J Child Neurol. 1994;9(2):216-217 (Pubitemid 24137094)
53. Fullerton v Florida Medical Association, 938 So2d 587 (Fla Dist Ct App 2006)
54. Austin v American Association of Neurological Surgeons, 253 F3d 967 (7th Cir 2001), cert denied, 534 US 1078 (2002)
55. Cohen FL. The expert medical witness in legal perspective. J Leg Med. 2004;25(2):185-209 (Pubitemid 38922824)
56. McAbee GN. Improper expert medical testimony: existing and proposed mechanisms of oversight. J Leg Med. 1998;19(2):257-272 (Pubitemid 28303569)
57. DeVille KA. The jury is out: pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements for medical malpractice claims. J Leg Med. 2007;28(3):333-395
58. Fraser JJ; American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Medical Liability. Technical report: alternative dispute resolution in medical malpractice. Pediatrics. 2001;107(3):602-607
59. Mello MM, Studdert DM, Kachalia AB, Brennan TA. Health courts and accountability for patient safety. Milbank Q. 2006;84(3):459-492
60. Boothman RC. Apologies and a strong defense at the University of Michigan Health System. Physician Exec. 2006;32(2):7-10
61. Guha SJ. "Fixing" medical malpractice: one doctor's perspective of a non-system in need of national standardization. N C Med J. 2000;61(4):227-230
62. Meadow W, Lantos JD. Expert testimony, legal reasoning, and justice: the case for adopting a data-based standard of care in allegations of medical negligence in the NICU. Clin Perinatol. 1996;23(3):583-595 (Pubitemid 26314127)
63. Rosenbaum JT. Lessons from litigation over silicone breast implants: a call for activism by scientists. Science. 1997;276(5318):1524-1525 (Pubitemid 27255307)
64. Dodds PR. The plaintiff's expert. Conn Med. 1999;63(2):99-101
65. Weinstein J. Improving expert testimony. Univ Richmond Law Rev. 1986;20(3):473-497
66. Meyer v McDonnell, 392 A2d 1129 (Md Ct Spec App 1978)
67. Freeman JM, Nelson KB. Expert medical testimony: responsibilities of medical societies. Neurology. 2004;63(9):1557-1558 (Pubitemid 39507568)
68. MacLennan A, Nelson KB, Hankins G, Speer M. Who will deliver our grandchildren? Implications of cerebral palsy litigation. JAMA. 2005;294(13):1688-1690 (Pubitemid 41407362)