Effects of peer coaching on teachers' collaborative interactions and students' mathematics achievement

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 203-212

  Murray, Sarah ^a   Ma, Xin ^b   Mazur, Joan ^b  

^a CENTRE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative interactions; Mathematics achievement; Peer coaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649577478     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOER.102.3.203-212     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ackland, R. (1991). A review of the peer coaching literature. Journal of Staff Development, 12(1), 22-27.
2. Bowman, C. L., & McCormick, S. (2000). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 256-261.
3. Cohen, J., &Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correction analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Conley, S., Bas-Isaac, E., & Scull, R. (1995). Teacher mentoring and peer coaching: A micropolitical interpretation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9, 7-19.
5. Garmston, R. (1987). How administrators support peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 44(5), 18-26.
6. Gaur, A. S., & Gaur, S. S. (2006). Statistical methods for practice and research: A guide to data analysis using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193-223.
8. Greene, T. (2004). Literature review for school-based staff developers and coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
9. Guskey, T. (1999). Apply time with wisdom. Journal of Staff Development, 20(2), 10-15.
10. Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
11. Hassel, E. (1999). Professional development: Learning from the best. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
12. Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13. Kentucky Department of Education. (2005). Core content for mathematics assessment. Frankfort, KY: Author.
14. Kohler, F. W., Crilley, K. M., Shearer, D. D., & Good, G. (1997). Effects for peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 240-250.
15. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16. Lyons, C. A., & Pinnell, G. S. (2001). Systems for change in literacy education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
18. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: Author.
19. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving. Paris: Author.
20. Poglinco, S. M., Bach, A. J., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M., & Supovitz, J. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America's Choice schools. Philadelphia: Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
21. Romagnano, L. (1994). Wrestling with change. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. Russo, A. (2004). School-based coaching: A revolution in professional development or just a fad? Harvard Education Letter, 20(4), 1-3.
23. Showers, B., Joyce, B. R., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future and state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 77-87.
24. Sparks, G. M., & Bruder, S. (1987). Before and after peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 42(3), 54-57.
25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychologi-cal processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. West, L., & Staub, F. C. (2003). Content-focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.