A grey-box modelling and its application in model-based fault detection

International Journal of COMADEM

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 21-30

  Shi, John Z ^a,c   Gu, Fengshou ^a,b   Lennox, Barry ^b   Ball, Andrew ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c HEBEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Electro hydraulic; Fault detection; Grey box model; Model based approach; Neural networks

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY MODEL; BLACK-BOX MODEL; ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC; ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC CONTROL SYSTEMS; GREY-BOX MODEL; GREY-BOX MODELLING; GREY-BOX MODELS; MODEL ACCURACY; MODEL ERRORS; MODEL-BASED APPROACH; MODEL-BASED FAULT DETECTION; NETWORK STRUCTURES; NORMAL CONDITION; RESIDUAL GENERATION; ROBUST MODELS; WORKING LOADS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FAULT DETECTION; HYDRAULIC MACHINERY; HYDRAULICS; NEURAL NETWORKS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 67649525028     PISSN: 13637681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Simani, S. Fantuzzi, C., & Patton, R. J., 2003. Model-based fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using identification techniques. Springer, London.
2. Chen, J., & Patton, R. J., 1999. Robust model-based fault diagnosis fordynamic systems. Kluwer Academic Publisher, London.
3. Frank, P. M., 1990. Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy-A survey and some new results. Automatica 26(3), 459-474.
4. Frank, P. M., 1996. Advances in observer-based fault diagnosis in dynamic systems. Engineering Simulation -13, 717-760.
5. Frank, P.M., Ding, S.X., & Marcu, T., 2000. Model-based fault diagnosis in technical processes. Trans, of the Institute of Measurement and Control 22(1), 57-101
6. Isermann, R., 1984. Process fault detection based on modelling and estimation methods A survey. Automatica 20(4), 387-404.
7. Isermann, R., & Balle, P., 1997. Trends in the application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes. Control Engineering Practice 5(5), 709-719.
8. Patton, R. J., 1991. A review of parity space approaches to fault diagnosis. Proceedings of IFAC symposium, Baden-Baden, 1991, pp65-81.
9. Patton, R. J., 1997. Robustness in model-based fault diagnosis: the 1995 situation. ARev. Control 21, 103-123.
10. Gertler, J., 1998. Fault detection and diagnosis in Engineering systems. Marcel Dekker, New York.
11. Liu, C.H., & Zhou, D. H., 2001. Adaptive threshold selection method in the fault detection. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University 22(3), 46.
12. Zhong, M., Ding, S. X., Lam, J., & Wang, H., 2003. An LMI approach to design robust fault detection filter for uncertain LTI systems. Automatica 39, 543-550.
13. Alessandri, A., 2003. Fault diagnosis for non-linear systems using a bank of neural estimators. Computers in Industry 52, 271-289.
14. Frank, P. M, & Koppen-seliger, B., 1997. New developments using AI in fault diagnosis. Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence 10(1), 3-14.
15. Isermann, R., & Nelles, O., 1997. Identification with dynamic neural networks architectures, comparisons, application. Prepants of the IFAC Symposium on System Identification Fukuoka, Vol. 3, 997-1022.
16. Marcu, T. and Mirea, L., 1997. Robust detection and isolation of process faults using neural networks. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 17(5), 72-79.
17. Balle, P., Fuessel, D., 2000. Closed-loop fault diagnosis based on a nonlinear process model and automatic fuzzy rule generation. Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence 13, 695-704.
18. Thomas, P., & Lefebvre, D., 2002. Fault detection and isolation in non-linear systems by using oversized neural networks. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 60, 181-192.
19. Marki, Y., & Loparo, K.A., 1997. A neural network approach to fault detection and diagnosis in industrial processes. IEEE Trans. On Control System Technology 5(6), 529-541.
20. Wilson, D.J.H., Irwin, G. W., & Lightbody, G, 1999. RBF principal manifold for process monitoring. IEEE Trans, on Neural Networks 10(6), 1424-1434.
21. Haykin, S., 1994. Neural networks. Macmillan College Publishing Company, Inc. New York.
22. Schilling, R.J., Carroll, J.J., & Al-Ajlouni, A.F., 2001. Approximation of Non-linear systems with radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Trans, on Neural networks 12(1), 1-15.
23. Zorzetto, L. F. M., Filho, R. M., & Wolf-Maciel, M. R., 2000. Processing modelling development through artificial neural networks and hybrid models. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24, 1355-1360.
24. Marcu, T, & Frank, P. M., 2002. Process fault detection and isolation using dynamic multi-layer perceptrons genetically evolved. Differential equations and dynamical systems 10(1-2), 169-200.
25. Yu, D. L., Gomm, J.B., & Williams, D., 1999. Sensor fault diagnosis in a chemical process via RBF neural networks. Control Engineering Practice 7, 49-55.
26. NØrgaard, M., Ravn, O., Poulsen, N. K., & Hansen, L. K., 2000. Neural networks for modelling and control of dynamic systems. Springle-verlag, London.
27. Simani, S., Patton, R. J., 2002. Neural networks for fault diagnosis of industrial plants at different working points. Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges, Belgium, pp495-500.
28. Simani, S. & Fantuzzi, C., 2000. Fault diagnosis in power plant using neural networks, Information Sciences 127, 125-136.
29. Rengaswamy, R., Mylaraswamy, D., Arzen, K.-E, Venkatasubramanian, V., 2001. A comparison of model-based and neural network-based diagnostic methods. Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence 14, 805-818.
30. Oliveira, R., 2004. Combining first principles modelling and artificial neural networks: a general framework. Computers and Chemical Engineering 28, 755-766.
31. Xiong, Q., & Jutan, A., 2002. Grey-box modelling and control of chemical processes. Chemical Engineering Science 57, 1027-1039.
32. Psichogios, D. C., & Ungar, L. H., 1992. Ahybrid neural network-first principles approach to process modelling. A. I. Ch. E. Journal 38(10), 1499-5111.
33. Thompson, M. L., & Kramer, M. A., 1994. Modellingh chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks. A. I. Ch. E. Journal 40(8), 1328-1340.
34. Pantelelis, N. G., Kanarachos, A. E., & Gotzias, N., 2000. Neural networks and simple models for the fault diagnosis of naval turbochargers. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 51, 387-397⋯.
35. 1rwin, G. W., Warwick, K., & Hunt, K. J, 1995. Neural network applications in control. Short Run Press Ltd., UK.
36. Specht, D. R, 1991. A general regression neural network, IEEE Trans, on Neural Networks 2(6), 568-576.
37. Watton, J., 1989. Fluid power system-modelling, simulation, analog and microcomputer control. Prentice Hall, London.
38. Dorf, R. C., & Bishop, R H., 2001. Modern Control Systems, 9th Edition, Prentice Hall.
39. Shi, Zhanqun, 2004. Ahybrid model-based approach to condition monitoring. PhD thesis, The University of Manchester, UK.