The integration of occupational Pension policies: Lessons for Canada

Canadian Public Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Hering, Martin ^a   Kpessa, Michael ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agenda setting; Canada; European Union; Occupational pensions; Problem definition; Regulation

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PENSION SYSTEM; SOCIAL POLICY;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 67649522515     PISSN: 03170861     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cpp.34.4.S137     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arnot, S. 2004. Directive 2003/41/EC on the Activities and Supervision of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision: A Legal Commentary. Brussels: European Federation for Retirement Provision.
2. Association of Canadian Pension Management (ACPM). 2004. Response to Proposed Regulatory Principles for a Model Pension Law. Toronto: Association of Canadian Pension Management.
3. Bank of Canada. 2004. "What Is the Funding Status of Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans in Canada?" Financial Systems Review (June):45-52.
4. Banting, K. 2005. "Canada: Nation-Building in a Federal Welfare State." In Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences, ed. H. Obinger, S. Leibfried, and F.G. Castles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones. eds. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities (CAPSA). 2004. Proposed Regulatory Principles for a Model Pension Law. Toronto: Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities.
8. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones. 2005. Proposed Funding Principles for a Model Pension Law. Toronto: Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities.
9. Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA). 2004. Comments on the Proposed Regulatory Principles for a Model Pension Law. Ottawa: Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
10. Canadian Labour Congress (CLC). 2004. Submission on the Proposed Regulatory Principles for a Model Pension Law. Ottawa: Canadian Labour Congress.
11. Coleman, W.D. 1992. "Financial Services Reform in Canada: The Evolution of Policy Dissension." Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de politiques 18:139-52.
12. Coleman, W.D. 1996. Financial Services, Globalization, and Domestic Policy Change: A Comparison of North America and the European Union. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
13. Coleman, W.D. 2002. "Federalism and Financial Services." In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, ed. H. Bakvis and G. Skogstad. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS). 2005. Annual Report 2004 and Work Programme 2005. Frankfurt: Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors.
15. Committee to Review the Structure of Securities Regulation in Canada. 2003. It's Time. Ottawa: Department of Finance Canada.
16. Council of the European Communities. 2002. "Common Position (EC) No. 62/2002 adopted by the Council on November 5, 2002." Official Journal of the European Communities (C 299 E):16-37.
17. Council of the European Union. 2001. Quality and Viability of Pensions: Joint Report on the Objectives and Working Methods in the Area of Pensions. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
18. Council of the European Union. 2002. "Presidency Note: Taxation of Occupational Pensions." Council of the European Union, Brussels.
19. Council of the European Union. 2003. "Directive 2003/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Activities and Supervision of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision." Official Journal of the European Union L235 (10).
20. De Ryck, K. 1996. European Pension Funds: Their Impact on European Capital Markets and Competitiveness. Brussels: European Federation for Retirement Provision.
21. Eberlein, B. and D. Kerwer. 2004. "New Governance in the European Union: A Theoretical Perspective." Journal of Common Market Studies 42(1):121-42.
22. Economic and Social Committee. 1998. "Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the 'Green Paper from the Commission on Supplementary Pensions in the Single Market.'': Official Journal of the European Communities C(73):114-21.
23. European Commission. 1997a. "Green Paper on Supplementary Pensions in the Single Market COM(1997)283 Final." Available on the European Commission website at http://europa.eu/documents/comm/green_papers/pdf/ com-1997-283_en.pdf
24. European Commission. 1997b. "Overview of the Responses to the Green Paper on Supplementary Pensions in the Single Market COM(97) 283." European Commission, Brussels.
25. European Commission. 2000. "Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Activities of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (COM 2000 507 final)." European Commission, Brussels.
26. European Commission. 2001. "The Elimination of Tax Obstacles to the Cross-Border Provision of Occupational Pensions (COM 2001 214 final)." European Commission, Brussels.
27. European Commission. 2005. "Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving the Portability of Supplementary Pension Rights (COM 2005 507 final)." European Commission, Brussels.
28. European Commission. 2007. "Amended Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving the Portability of Supplementary Pension Rights (COM 2007 603 final)." European Commission, Brussels.
29. European Parliament. 2005. "Oral Question with Debate: Reasons for the Poor Implementation of the Occupational Pensions Directive by EU Member States." European Parliament Session Document (B6-0338/05), Strasbourg.
30. Expert Commission on Pensions. 2007. Reviewing Ontario's Pension System: What Are the Issues? Toronto: Expert Commission on Pensions.
31. Grahl, J. and P. Teague. 2005. "Problems of Financial Market Integration in the EU." Journal of European Public Policy 12(6):1005-21.
32. Haverland, M. 2007. "When the Welfare State Meets the Regulatory State: EU Occupational Pension Policy." Journal of European Public Policy 14(6):886-904.
33. Heclo, H. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34. Kaplan, A.N. 2006. Pension Law. Toronto: Irwin Law.
35. Kingdon, J.W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edition. New York: Harper Collins.
36. Laboul, A. and J. Yermo. 2006. "Regulatory Principles and Institutions." In Oxford Handbook of Pension and Retirement Income, eds. G.L. Clark, A.H. Munnell, and M.J. Orzag. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Obinger, H., S. Leibfried, and F.G. Castles. 2005. "Bypasses to a Social Europe? Lessons from Federal Experience." Journal of European Public Policy 12 (3):545-71.
38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2004a. "OECD Countries Agree on Core Principles for Occupational Pension Fund Regulation." Press Release, 22 July 2004.
39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2004b. OECD Recommendation on Core Principles of Occupational Pension Regulation. Paris: OECD.
40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2005. "Ageing and Pension System Reform: Implications for Financial Markets and Economic Policies." Financial Market Trends (November):Supplement.
41. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2007a. OECD Guidelines on Funding and Benefit Security in Occupational Pension Plans: Recommendation of the Council. Paris: OECD.
42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2007b. Pension Markets in Focus. Vol. 4. Paris: OECD.
43. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2007c. Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
44. Pierson, P. 1993. "When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change." World Politics 45 (July):595-628.
45. Provincial-Territorial Council of Ministers of Securities Regulation. 2007. Year End Progress Report 2006. Calgary: Provincial-Territorial Securities Initiative.
46. Provincial-Territorial Ministers Responsible for Securities Regulation. 2004. A Provincial/Territorial Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Securities Regulation. Calgary: Provincial-Territorial Securities Initiative.
47. Queisser, M. 1998. "Regulation and Supervision of Pension Funds: Principles and Practices." International Social Security Review 51(2):39-55.
48. Rocha, R., R. Hinz, and J. Gutierrez. 1999. "Improving the Regulation and Supervision of Pension Funds: Are There Lessons from the Banking Sector?" World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper 9929. Available on the World Bank website at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOCIALPROTECTION/Resources/ SP-Discussion-papers/Pensions-DP/9929.pdf
49. Rochefort, D.A., and R.W. Cobb, eds. 1994. The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
50. Rose, R. 1993. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy. London: Chatham House.
51. Rose, R. 2005. Learning from Comparative Public Policy: A Practical Guide. New York: Routledge.
52. Saint-Martin, D. 2004. "Coordinating Interdependence: Governance and Social Policy Redesign in Britain, the European Union and Canada." CPRN Social Architecture Papers F (41), Ottawa.
53. Scharpf, F.W. 2001. "Notes Toward a Theory of Multilevel Governing in Europe." Scandinavian Political Studies 24(1):1-26.
54. Scharpf, F.W. 2002. "The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity." Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4):645-70.
55. Schmidt, S.K. 2007. "Mutual Recognition as a New Mode of Governance." Journal of European Public Policy 14(5):667-81.
56. Schmidt, V. 2000. "Values and Discourse in the Politics of Adjustment." In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, ed. F.W. Scharpf and V. Schmidt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Stevens, Y. 2004. The Meaning of "National Social and Labor Legislation" in Directive 2003/41/EC on the Activities and Supervision of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision. Brussels: European Association of Paritarian Institutions.
58. Streeck, W. 1995. "From Market Making to State Building? Reflections on the Political Economy of European Social Policy." In European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, ed. S. Leibfried and P. Pierson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
59. Weir, M., A.S. Orloff, and T. Skocpol, eds. 1988. The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.