Questions about floral (dis)integration: Letters

New Phytologist

Volumn 183, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 247-248

  Harder, Lawrence D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Eigenvalue variance; Floral integration; Floral morphology; Null distribution; Pollination

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOWER; LETTER; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOWERS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 67649511939     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02881.x     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Armbruster WS, Pélabon C, Hansen TF, Mulder CPH. 2004. Floral integration, modularity, and precision: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In : Pigliucci M, Preston K, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. New York, NY, USA : Oxford University Press, 23 49.
2. Ashman T-L, Majetic CJ. 2006. Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns. Heredity 96 : 343 352. (Pubitemid 43670397)
3. Berg RL. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14 : 171 180.
4. Chevrud JM, Wagner GP, Dow MM. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Systematic Zoology 38 : 201 213.
5. Ordano M, Fornoni J, Boege K, Domínguez CA. 2008. The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration. New Phytologist 179 : 1183 1192.
6. Stuart A, Ord JK. 1987. Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, Volume 1. Distribution theory. New York, NY, USA : Oxford University Press.
7. Wagner GP. 1984. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. Journal of Mathematical Biology 21 : 77 95. (Pubitemid 15180126)