Acceleration-based gait test for healthy subjects: Reliability and reference data

Gait and Posture

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 192-196

  Senden, R ^a,b   Grimm, B ^a   Heyligers, I C ^a   Savelberg, H H C M ^b   Meijer, K ^b  

^a Sittard Geleen Heerlen   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Gait; Reference data; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DECELERATION; FEMALE; GAIT; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WALKING SPEED;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 67649499823     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sadeghi H., Allard P., Prince F., and Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait Posture 12 (2000) 34-45
2. Brunnekreef J.J., van Uden C.J., van Moorsel S., and Kooloos J.G. Reliability of videotaped observational gait analysis in patients with orthopaedic impairments. BMC-musculoskelet disord 6 (2005) 17-26
3. Salch M., and Murdoch G. In defence of gait analysis. Observation and measurement in gait assessment. J Bone Joint Surg 67B (1985) 237-241
4. Winter D.A., Patla A.E., Frank J.S., and Walt S.E. Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther 70 (1990) 340-347
5. Cho S.H., Park J.M., and Kwon O.Y. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Cl Biomech 19 (2004) 145-152
6. van Dieën J., Pijnappels M., and Bobbert M.F. Age related intrinsic limitations in preventing a trip and regaining balance after a trip. Saf Sci 43 (2005) 437-453
7. Öberg T., Karsznia A., and Öberg K. Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. J Rehabil Res Dev 30 (1993) 210-223
8. Ostrosky K.M., Van Swearingen J.M., and Burdett Z.G. A comparison of gait characteristics in younger and old subjects. Phys Ther 74 (1994) 637-646
9. Maffiulett N.A., Gorelick M., Kramers-de Quervain I., Bizzini M., Munzinger J.P., Tomasetti S., et al. Concurrent validity and intrasession reliability of the IDEEA accelerometry system for the quantification of spatiotemporal gait parameters. Gait Posture 27 (2008) 160-163
10. Mackey A.H., Stott N.S., and Walt S.E. Reliability and validity of an activity monitor (IDEEA) in the determination of temporal-spatial gait parameters in individuals with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 28 (2008) 634-639
11. Brandes M., Zijlstra W., Heikens S., van Lummel R., and Rosenbaum D. Accelerometry based assessment of gait parameters in children. Gait Posture 24 (2006) 482-486
12. MoeNilssen R., and Helbostad J.L. Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. J Biomech 37 (2004) 121-126
13. Zijlstra W., and Hof A.L. Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. Gait Posture 18 (2003) 1-10
14. Moe-Nilssen R. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometry during standing and walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 (1998) 1377-1385
15. Henriksen M., Lund H., Moe Nilssen R., Bliddal H., and Danneskiod-Samsoe B. Test-rest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture 19 (2004) 288-297
16. Menz H.B., Lord S.R., and Fritzpatrick R.C. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. Gait Posture 18 (2003) 35-46
17. Chau T., Young S., and Redekop S. Managing variability in the summary and comparison of gait data. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2 (2005) 22-42
18. Auvinet B., Berrut G., Touzard C.M.L., Collet N., Chaleil D., and Barrey E. Reference data for normal subjects obtained with an accelerometric device. Gait Posture 16 (2002) 124-134
19. Grimm B., Senden R., and Vanderhenst T. Application feasibility of accelerometer based gait analysis in clinical orthopaedics. J Biomech 39 (2006) S110
20. Owings T.M., and Grabiner M.D. Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion. J Biomech 37 (2004) 935-938
21. Hausdorff J.M. Gait variability: Methods, modelling and meaning. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2 (2005) 19-28
22. Hof A.L. Scaling gait data to body size. Gait Posture 4 (1996) 222-223
23. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86 (1979) 420-428
24. Allet L., Armand S., Bie de R.A., Golay A., Monnin D., Aminian K., et al. Reliability of diabetic patients' gait parameters in a challenging environment. Gait Posture 28 (2008) 680-686
25. Soudan K. Standardization of gait kinematic data using a gait symmetry index and Fourier analysis. In: Huiskes R., Van Camen D.K., and De Wijn J.R. (Eds). Biomechanics: Principles and Applications, Development in Biomechanics vol.1 (1982), Martinus Nijhoff 135-140
26. Elble R.J., Sienko-Thomas S., Higgins C., and Colliver J. Stride dependent changes in gait of older people. J Neurol 238 (1991) 1-5
27. Kimura T., Kobayashi H., Nakayama E., and Hanaoka M. Effects of aging on gait patterns in the healthy elderly. Anthropol Sci 115 (2007) 67-72
28. Menz H.B., Latt M.D., Tiedemann A., Mun San Kwan M., and Lord S.R. Reliability of the Gaitrite walkway system for the quantification of temporal-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. Gait Posture 20 (2004) 20-25
29. Kuo A.D. The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: Dynamic walking perspective. Hum Mov Sci 26 4 (2007) 617-656