Incremental hypothesis alignment for building confusion networks with application to machine translation system combination

3rd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT 2008 at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 183-186

  Rosti, Antti Veikko I ^a   Zhang, Bing ^a   Matsoukas, Spyros ^a   Schwartz, Richard ^a  

^a BBN TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; DECODING; MACHINE TRANSLATION;

ALIGNMENT METHODS; CONFUSION NETWORKS; MACHINE TRANSLATION EVALUATIONS; MACHINE TRANSLATION SYSTEMS; MULTIPLE MACHINE; NETWORK DECODING; NETWORK-BASED; SYSTEM COMBINATION; TEST SETS; WORD ORDERS;

ALIGNMENT;

EID: 67649498298     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. S. Bangalore, G. Bordel, and G. Riccardi. 2001. Computing consensus translation from multiple machine translation systems. In Proc. ASRU, pages 351-354.
2. R. Durbin, S.R. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchison. 1988. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge Univ. Press.
3. A. Lavie and A. Agarwal. 2007. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with high levels of correlation with human judgments. In Proc. ACL/WMT, pages 228-231.
4. E. Matusov, N. Ueffing, and H. Ney. 2006. Computing consensus translation from multiple machine translation systems using enhanced hypotheses alignment. In Proc. EACL, pages 33-40.
5. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proc. ACL, pages 311-318.
6. A.-V.I. Rosti, S. Matsoukas, and R. Schwartz. 2007. Improved word-level system combination for machine translation. In Proc. ACL 2007, pages 312-319.
7. M. Snover, B. Dorr, R. Schwartz, L. Micciula, and J. Makhoul. 2006. A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. In Proc. AMTA, pages 223-231.