Robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting: The feasibility and clinical outcome of 196 procedures

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 170-177

  Caynak, Baris ^a   Sagbas, Ertan ^a   Onan, Burak ^a   Onan, Ismihan Selen ^a   Sanisoglu, Ilhan ^a   Akpinar, Belhhan ^a  

^a ISTANBUL BILIM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Da Vinci; Robotics

Indexed keywords

HEART; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; CORONARY DISEASE; DA VINCI; FOLLOW UP; MEDIAN STERNOTOMY; MULTIVESSEL; REVASCULARIZATION; ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEMS;

BLOOD VESSELS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; ROBOTICS; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 67649435500     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.244     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Falk V, Walter T, Mohr F. Robotics and telemanipulation, the da Vinci system. In Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, Goldstein D, Oz M (eds). Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, 2004; 445-457.
2. Maniar H, Prasad S, Damiano R. Robotics and telemanipulation: the Zeus system. In Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, Goldstein D, Oz M (eds). Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, 2004; 429-443.
3. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bernecker O, et al. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 504-510.
4. Turner WF, Sloan JH. Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass on a beating heart: initial experience and implications for the future. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(3): 790-794.
5. Srivastava S, Gadasalli S, Agusala M, et al. Use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in CABG through lateral thoracotomy with robotic assistance in 150 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81(3): 800-806.
6. Argenziano M, Katz M, Bonatti J, et al.; TECAB Trial Investigators. Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81(5): 1666-1674.
7. Boobhwani M, Rubens FD, Sellke FW, et al. Mortality and myocardial infarction following surgical versus percutaneous revascularization of isolated left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29(1): 65-70.
8. Taggart DP. Thomas B. Ferguson Lecture. Coronary artery bypass grafting is still the best treatment for multivessel and left main disease, but patients need to know. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(6): 1966-1975.
9. Barner HB. Status of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30(3): 419-424.
10. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001; 358(9285): 870-875.
11. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78(6): 2005-2014.
12. Stuge O, Liddicoat J. Emerging opportunities for cardiac surgeons within structural heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132(6): 1258-1261.
13. Sagbas E, Akpinar B, Sanisoglu I, et al. Robotics in cardiac surgery: the Istanbul experience. Int J Med Robot 2006; 2(2): 179-187.
14. Karagoz HY, Sönmez B, Bakkaloglu B, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in the conscious patient without endotracheal anesthesia. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70(1): 91-96.
15. Vander Salm TJ, Kip KE, Jones RH, et al. What constitutes optimal surgical revascularization? Answers from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39(4): 565-572.
16. Fraund S, Herrmann G, Witzke A, et al. Midterm follow-up after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1225-1231.
17. Kappert U, Tugtekin SM, Cichon R, et al. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: a word of caution implicated by a five-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135(4): 857-862.
18. Katz MR, Van Praet F, de Canniere D, et al. Integrated coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Circulation 2006; 114(suppl 1): 1473-1476.