Preliminary study of an adaptive wing with shape memory alloy torsion actuators

Materials and Design

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 4200-4210

  Icardi, U ^a   Ferrero, L ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Composites polymer matrix (A); Mechanical fastening (D); Sandwich structures (B)

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE WING; AIRFOIL SHAPE; CAMBER CONTROL; COMPOSITES POLYMER MATRIX (A); COUNTER ROTATING; CRUISE SPEED; ELECTRO-MECHANICAL; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; FLIGHT CONDITIONS; LOCAL SHAPE; MECHANICAL FASTENING (D); PEAK POWER; PIEZOELECTRIC MOTORS; PRELIMINARY DESIGN; SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY; SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY DEVICES; SHAPE RECOVERY; SMA WIRE; SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFTS; SUB-STRUCTURE; TORSION ACTUATORS; UPWARD MOTION;

ACTUATORS; AERODYNAMICS; ALLOYS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES; ROTATION; SANDWICH STRUCTURES; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; TORSIONAL STRESS; TUBES (COMPONENTS); UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

WINGS;

EID: 67649403104     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.045     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Smith S.B., and Nelson D.W. Determination of the aerodynamic characteristics of the mission adaptive wing. AIAA J Aircraft 27 11 (1990) 950-958
2. Siclari MJ, Nostrand W, van Austin F. The design of transonic airfoil sections for an adaptive wing concept using a stochastic optimization method. AIAA 34th aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV. Paper AIAA-96-0329; 1996.
3. Stanewsky E. Aerodynamic benefits of adaptive wing technology. Aerosp Sci Technol 4 (2000) 439-452
4. Stanewsky E. Adaptive wing and flow control technology. Progr Aerosp Sci 37 (2001) 583-667
5. Waisman H., and Abramovich H. Open-loop flutter analysis of a composite UAV model using the active stiffening effect. Finite Elem Anal Des 40 (2004) 1283-1295
6. Greg W., Pettit G.W., Robertshaw H.H., and Inman D.J. Morphing wings for unmanned aircraft. Smart Mater Bull (2001) 7-12
7. Kudva JN, Lockyer AJ, Appa K. Adaptive aircraft wing. In: AGARD SMP lecture series 205, Smart structures and materials: implications for military aircraft of new generation, AGARD-LS-205. 1996.
8. Kudva J, Jardine P, Martin C, Appa K. Overview of the ARPA/WL "smart structures and material development Smart - wing" contract. SPIE, 1996; 2721.
9. Brinson L.C. One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloy: thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable. Int J Mater Syst Struct 4 (1993) 229-242
10. Toi Y., Lee J.B., and Taya M. Finite element analysis of superelastic, large deformation behavior of shape memory alloy helical springs. Comput Struct 82 (2004) 1685-1693
11. Icardi U., Ferrero L. Impact analysis of sandwich composites based on a refined plate element with strain energy updating. Compos Struct, in press.
12. Icardi U, Ferrero L. Optimisation of sandwich panels with functionally graded core and faces. Compos Sci Technol, in press.
13. Obayashi S., and Guruswamy G.P. Convergence acceleration of an aeroelastic Navier Stokes solver. AIAA J 33 6 (1995) 1134-1141
14. Ashill PR, Fulker JL, Simmons MJ. Simulated active control of shock waves in experiments on aerofoil models. In: Proceedings ICEFM, Turin; July 1994.
15. Birkemeyer J., Rosemann H., and Stanewsky E. Shock control on a swept wing. Aerosp Sci Technol 4 (2000) 147-156
16. Thornton SV. Reduction of structural loads using maneuver load control on the advanced fighter technology integration (AFTI)/F-111 Mission adaptive wing. NASA TM 4526; September 1993.
17. Smith JW, Lock WP, Payne GA. Variable-camber systems integration and operational performance of the AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing. NASA TM 4370; April 1992.
18. Smith SB, Phillips PW. AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing (MAW) automatic flight control system modes lift and drag characteristics. AFFTC-TR-89-03; May 1989.
19. Larson RR. Flight control system development and flight test experience with the F-111 mission adaptive wing aircraft. NASA TM 88265; 1986.
20. Gilbert W.W. Mission adaptive wing system for tactical aircraft. J Aircraft 18 7 (1981) 597-602
21. Martins AL, Catalano FM. Viscous drag optimization for a transport aircraft mission adaptive wing. In: Proceedings of the 21st ICAS congress, Melbourne, Australia. Paper A98-31499; 1998.
22. Szodruch J. The influence of camber variation on the aerodynamics of civil transport aircraft. AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, NV. Paper AIAA-85-0353; 1985.
23. Monner H.P. Realization of an optimised wing camber by using form variable flap structures. Aerosp Sci Technol 5 (2001) 445-455
24. Liu S., Ge W., and Li S. Optimal design of compliant trailing edge for shape changing. Chin J Aeron 21 (2008) 187-192
25. Renken J. Variable wing camber control systems for the future Airbus control. Company report n° MBB-UT-101/88; February 1988.
26. Soaring on intelligent wings: aerodynamicists at MBB are already at work on tomorrow's projects. New-Tech News, n 1. 1989.
27. MBB studies variable-camber wing for airbus. JPRS-WST-85-024; August 1985.
28. Austin F., Rossi M.J., Van Nostrand W., and Knowles G. Static shape control for adaptive wing. AIAA J 32 9 (1993) 1895-1901
29. Gilyard BG. Development of a real-time transport performance optimization methodology. NASA TM-4730; 1996.
30. Gilyard BG. In-flight transport performance optimization: an experimental flight research program and an operational scenario. NASA TM-97-206229; 1997.
31. Gilyard BG, Espana M. On the use of controls for subsonics transport performances improvement: overview and future directions. NASA TM 4605; August 1994.
32. Gilyard BG, Georgie J, Barnicki JS. Flight test of an adaptive configuration optimization system for transport aircraft. NASA TM 1999-206569; January 1999.
33. Peake DJ, Henry FS, Pearcey HH. Viscous flow control with air-jet vortex generators. In: AIAA 17th Applied aerodynamics conference, Norfolk, VA. Paper AIAA-99-3175; 1999.
34. Lin J.C. Application of micro-vortex generators for turbulent flow separation control. IUTAM Symposium on mechanics of passive and active control, Göttingen, September. 7-11, 1998 (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers
35. Seifert A., and Pack L.G. Oscillatory control of separation at high Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 37 9 (1999) 1062-1071
36. Hefner J.N, Bushnell DM. Viscous drag reduction via surface mass injection. Viscous drag reduction in boundary layers. In: AIAA Progr in Astron and Aeron, 123, 1990.
37. Stanewsky E, Krogmann P. Transonic drag rise and drag reduction by active/passive boundary layer control. In: AGARD report no. 723. Lecture Series Aircraft Drag Prediction and Reduction. EF-069/99; 1999.
38. Raghunathan S, Mabey DG. Passive shock wave boundary layer control experiments on a circular arc model. AIAA Paper 86-0285; 1986.
39. Stanewsky E, Délery J, Fulker J, Geissler W. Euroshock- Drag Reduction by passive shock control. In: Notes on numerical fluid mechanics 1997; 56, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden, 1997.
40. Ho C-M, Huang P-H, Yang J.M, Lee G-B, Tai Y-C, Active flow control by micro systems. IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Passive and Active Control, Göttingen, September. 7-11, 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
41. Kota S. Compliant systems using monolithic mechanisms. Smart Mater Bull March (2001) 7-10
42. Kimura M, Tung S, Ho C.-M, Jiang F, Tai Y-C. MEMS for aerodynamic control. In: AIAA 28th fluid dynamics conference; AIAA 4th shear flow control conference, Snowmass Village, CO. Paper AIAA-97-2118; 1997.
43. Cho M., and Kim S. Structural morphing using two-way shape memory effect of SMA. Int J Solids Struct 42 (2005) 1759-1776
44. Ryklina E.P., Prokoshkin S.D., Khmelevskaya I.Y., and Shakhmina A.A. One-way and two-way shape memory effect in thermomechanically treated TiNi-based alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 481 /482 (2008) 134-137